Michael P Triebwasser1, Elisha D O Roberson2, Yi Yu3, Elizabeth C Schramm1, Erin K Wagner4, Soumya Raychaudhuri4, Johanna M Seddon4, John P Atkinson1. 1. Washington University School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States. 2. Washington University School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States 2Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Genetics, St. Louis, Missouri, United States. 3. Ophthalmic Epidemiology and Genetics Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 4. Ophthalmic Epidemiology and Genetics Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 4Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Sackler School of Graduate Medical Sciences, Tufts Universi.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has a substantial genetic risk component, as evidenced by the risk from common genetic variants uncovered in the first genome-wide association studies. More recently, it has become apparent that rare genetic variants also play an independent role in AMD risk. We sought to determine if rare variants in complement factor H (CFH) played a role in AMD risk. METHODS: We had previously collected DNA from a large population of patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration (A-AMD) and controls for targeted deep sequencing of candidate AMD risk genes. In this analysis, we tested for an increased burden of rare variants in CFH in 1665 cases and 752 controls from this cohort. RESULTS: We identified 65 missense, nonsense, or splice-site mutations with a minor allele frequency ≤ 1%. Rare variants with minor allele frequency ≤ 1% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, P = 4.4 × 10⁻²), 0.5% (OR = 1.6, P = 2.6 × 10⁻²), and all singletons (OR = 2.3, P = 3.3 × 10⁻²) were enriched in A-AMD cases. Moreover, we observed loss-of-function rare variants (nonsense, splice-site, and loss of a conserved cysteine) in 10 cases and serum levels of FH were decreased in all 5 with an available sample (haploinsufficiency). Further, rare variants in the major functional domains of CFH were increased in cases (OR = 3.2; P = 1.4 × 10⁻³) and the magnitude of the effect correlated with the disruptive nature of the variant, location in an active site, and inversely with minor allele frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In this large A-AMD cohort, rare variants in the CFH gene were enriched and tended to be located in functional sites or led to low serum levels. These data, combined with those indicating a similar, but even more striking, increase in rare variants found in CFI, strongly implicate complement activation in A-AMD etiopathogenesis as CFH and CFI interact to inhibit the alternative pathway.
PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) has a substantial genetic risk component, as evidenced by the risk from common genetic variants uncovered in the first genome-wide association studies. More recently, it has become apparent that rare genetic variants also play an independent role in AMD risk. We sought to determine if rare variants in complement factor H (CFH) played a role in AMD risk. METHODS: We had previously collected DNA from a large population of patients with advanced age-related macular degeneration (A-AMD) and controls for targeted deep sequencing of candidate AMD risk genes. In this analysis, we tested for an increased burden of rare variants in CFH in 1665 cases and 752 controls from this cohort. RESULTS: We identified 65 missense, nonsense, or splice-site mutations with a minor allele frequency ≤ 1%. Rare variants with minor allele frequency ≤ 1% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, P = 4.4 × 10⁻²), 0.5% (OR = 1.6, P = 2.6 × 10⁻²), and all singletons (OR = 2.3, P = 3.3 × 10⁻²) were enriched in A-AMD cases. Moreover, we observed loss-of-function rare variants (nonsense, splice-site, and loss of a conserved cysteine) in 10 cases and serum levels of FH were decreased in all 5 with an available sample (haploinsufficiency). Further, rare variants in the major functional domains of CFH were increased in cases (OR = 3.2; P = 1.4 × 10⁻³) and the magnitude of the effect correlated with the disruptive nature of the variant, location in an active site, and inversely with minor allele frequency. CONCLUSIONS: In this large A-AMD cohort, rare variants in the CFH gene were enriched and tended to be located in functional sites or led to low serum levels. These data, combined with those indicating a similar, but even more striking, increase in rare variants found in CFI, strongly implicate complement activation in A-AMD etiopathogenesis as CFH and CFI interact to inhibit the alternative pathway.
Authors: Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo Journal: Genome Res Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jesen A Fagerness; Julian B Maller; Benjamin M Neale; Robyn C Reynolds; Mark J Daly; Johanna M Seddon Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Marina Noris; Jessica Caprioli; Elena Bresin; Chiara Mossali; Gaia Pianetti; Sara Gamba; Erica Daina; Chiara Fenili; Federica Castelletti; Annalisa Sorosina; Rossella Piras; Roberta Donadelli; Ramona Maranta; Irene van der Meer; Edward M Conway; Peter F Zipfel; Timothy H Goodship; Giuseppe Remuzzi Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Robyn Reynolds; M Elizabeth Hartnett; John P Atkinson; Patricia C Giclas; Bernard Rosner; Johanna M Seddon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Don H Anderson; Monte J Radeke; Natasha B Gallo; Ethan A Chapin; Patrick T Johnson; Christy R Curletti; Lisa S Hancox; Jane Hu; Jessica N Ebright; Goldis Malek; Michael A Hauser; Catherine Bowes Rickman; Dean Bok; Gregory S Hageman; Lincoln V Johnson Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Johanna M Seddon; Robyn Reynolds; Julian Maller; Jesen A Fagerness; Mark J Daly; Bernard Rosner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yi Yu; Erin K Wagner; Eric H Souied; Sanna Seitsonen; Ilkka J Immonen; Paavo Häppölä; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Mark J Daly; Johanna M Seddon Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Stuart Cantsilieris; Bradley J Nelson; John Huddleston; Carl Baker; Lana Harshman; Kelsi Penewit; Katherine M Munson; Melanie Sorensen; AnneMarie E Welch; Vy Dang; Felix Grassmann; Andrea J Richardson; Robyn H Guymer; Tina A Graves-Lindsay; Richard K Wilson; Bernhard H F Weber; Paul N Baird; Rando Allikmets; Evan E Eichler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Valeriy V Lyzogubov; Puran S Bora; Xiaobo Wu; Leah E Horn; Ryan de Roque; Xeniya V Rudolf; John P Atkinson; Nalini S Bora Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 4.307