Literature DB >> 26501222

Predictive Value of EuroSCORE II in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Ares K Menon1, Mare Mechelinck1, Jan Unterkofler1, Andreas Goetzenich1, Rüdiger Autschbach1, Lachmandath Tewarie1, Ajay Moza1.   

Abstract

Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are nowadays a widespread option for the effective treatment of heart failure. We hypothesized that the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) might be a superior tool in clinical decision making compared with other established score systems. Methods In this retrospective, single-center analysis, between 2008 and 2014, 40 consecutive patients were followed for up to 36 months after LVAD (Thoratec HeartMate II) implantation. Postoperative survival was correlated to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) levels, Destination Therapy Risk Score (DTRS), HeartMate II Risk Score (HMRS), and EuroSCORE II. Results Overall, a positive outcome (survival, transplantation, or weaning) was reached in 87.5% (30 days), 70% (1 year), and 60% (2 and 3 years) of cases. Patients were categorized as high, medium, and low risk by use of the different scores. Within the created subgroups, the following 1-year positive outcomes were achieved-INTERMACS: high risk 58% versus low risk 68%; EuroSCORE II: high risk 17% versus low risk 89%; DTRS: high risk 44% versus low risk 75%; and HMRS: high risk 60% versus low risk 100%. After 1 year, the EuroSCORE II classification's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was superior (AUC = 0.78) and Fisher exact test revealed a significant predictive value for this classification (p = 0.0037) but not for INTERMACS levels, DTRS, or HMRS classifications. Conclusion These results support the assumption that EuroSCORE II risk classification may be useful to predict survival in LVAD patients. In our observation, it proved to be superior to INTERMACS, DTRS, and HMRS after 1 year. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26501222     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1565001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  2 in total

1.  Strategies of Wait-listing for Heart Transplant vs Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Alone for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Anuradha Lala; John C Rowland; Bart S Ferket; Annetine C Gelijns; Emilia Bagiella; Sean P Pinney; Alan J Moskowitz; Marissa A Miller; Francis D Pagani; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Predicting Long Term Outcome in Patients Treated With Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Penn-Columbia Risk Score.

Authors:  Edo Y Birati; Thomas C Hanff; Dawn Maldonado; E Wilson Grandin; Peter J Kennel; Jeremy A Mazurek; Esther Vorovich; Matthew Seigerman; Jessica L L Howard; Michael A Acker; Yoshifumi Naka; Joyce Wald; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Pavan Atluri; Kenneth B Margulies; P Christian Schulze; J Eduardo Rame
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.