Swati Sharma1, Sambhav Vora2, Vinisha Pandey3. 1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Triveni Institute of Dental Sciences, Hospital and Research Centre , Bilaspur, Chattisgarh, India . 2. Private Practice, Department of Endo & Consevative, Hyderabad, India . 3. Senior Lecturer, Rama Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre , Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excessive overbite is one of the most common problems that confront the orthodontist. Deep bite can be due to infraocclusion of posterior teeth, supraocclusion of anterior teeth or a combination of the two. Correction of same can be carried out by extrusion of molars, intrusion of incisors or by a combination of both respectively. Various intrusion arches are recommended for correcting deep bite by true intrusion of anterior teeth, Utility arches, Segmental arch, Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and Connecticut New Arch (CNA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of CIA and CNA intrusion arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tracings recorded from pre and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of 25 patients treated by CIA (Group I) and another 25 patients treated by CNA (Group II) intrusion arches in deep bite cases after four months of treatment were analysed and findings were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test was used to compare pre and post-treatment changes within Groups I and II and unpaired t-test was used to compare treatment changes between Group I and Group II. A P-value of < 0.05 was set for statistical significance. RESULTS: Findings of this study demonstrate that an average of 1mm of intrusion takes place with CIA intrusion arch and 1.3mm with CNA intrusion arch in a period of 4 months. Both intrusion arches do not affect the position of molar in vertical or anteroposterior plane. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Both CIA and CNA intrusion arches are effective in bringing about intrusion of lower incisors.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excessive overbite is one of the most common problems that confront the orthodontist. Deep bite can be due to infraocclusion of posterior teeth, supraocclusion of anterior teeth or a combination of the two. Correction of same can be carried out by extrusion of molars, intrusion of incisors or by a combination of both respectively. Various intrusion arches are recommended for correcting deep bite by true intrusion of anterior teeth, Utility arches, Segmental arch, Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and Connecticut New Arch (CNA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of CIA and CNA intrusion arches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tracings recorded from pre and post-treatment lateral cephalograms of 25 patients treated by CIA (Group I) and another 25 patients treated by CNA (Group II) intrusion arches in deep bite cases after four months of treatment were analysed and findings were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Paired t-test was used to compare pre and post-treatment changes within Groups I and II and unpaired t-test was used to compare treatment changes between Group I and Group II. A P-value of < 0.05 was set for statistical significance. RESULTS: Findings of this study demonstrate that an average of 1mm of intrusion takes place with CIA intrusion arch and 1.3mm with CNA intrusion arch in a period of 4 months. Both intrusion arches do not affect the position of molar in vertical or anteroposterior plane. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Both CIA and CNA intrusion arches are effective in bringing about intrusion of lower incisors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep bite; Deep bite correction; Malocclusions