Vivek Tiwari1, Veenita Yogi1, Hameed Uzzafar Ghori2, Om Prakash Singh3, Karan Peepre4, Suresh Yadav5, Chaitlal Mohare6. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India . 2. Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India . 3. Professor and Head, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India . 4. Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India . 5. Medical Physicist, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India . 6. Scientific Officer, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gandhi Medical College , Bhopal, India .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cancer is increasing throughout the world. One of the prime aims of its management is early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Factors causing delay to either of these goals should be identified and rectified. AIM: To identify the factors causing delayed initial diagnosis and subsequent management in patients presenting to the Oncology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred proven cancer patients were prospectively evaluated for the pattern of presentation to the outpatient Department of Radiation Oncology of a Government Medical College (MC) in Central India. RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 51.05 years (range 7 months-77 years). The number of male patients was 168 while females were 132. The duration of symptoms ranged from 20 days to 3 years. The number of patients with little/no education presented mainly in advanced stages as compared to their educated counterpart and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The number of patients presenting directly to the department was 108, those diagnosed outside and referred to us was 84 while those diagnosed and received some form of oncologic treatment outside and referred thereafter was 108. The difference in the primary delay between patients presenting directly to the MC versus those diagnosed outside was significant (p=0.0126). The mean duration of starting definitive treatment after presentation to the outpatient was 4.68 days (range 0-22 days) and was very significantly (p< 0.001) less than the secondary delays caused to the other two subsets of patients. CONCLUSION: Factors causing delayed presentation are both patient and system related. It is imperative to educate the common people regarding the early signs and symptoms of cancer. At the same time, the system needs to overhaul its efficiency to avoid secondary delays that adversely affect the treatment outcome. An upgradation of the existing oncology facilities in the public sector can achieve this target efficiently.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of cancer is increasing throughout the world. One of the prime aims of its management is early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Factors causing delay to either of these goals should be identified and rectified. AIM: To identify the factors causing delayed initial diagnosis and subsequent management in patients presenting to the Oncology department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred proven cancerpatients were prospectively evaluated for the pattern of presentation to the outpatient Department of Radiation Oncology of a Government Medical College (MC) in Central India. RESULTS: The mean age of presentation was 51.05 years (range 7 months-77 years). The number of male patients was 168 while females were 132. The duration of symptoms ranged from 20 days to 3 years. The number of patients with little/no education presented mainly in advanced stages as compared to their educated counterpart and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The number of patients presenting directly to the department was 108, those diagnosed outside and referred to us was 84 while those diagnosed and received some form of oncologic treatment outside and referred thereafter was 108. The difference in the primary delay between patients presenting directly to the MC versus those diagnosed outside was significant (p=0.0126). The mean duration of starting definitive treatment after presentation to the outpatient was 4.68 days (range 0-22 days) and was very significantly (p< 0.001) less than the secondary delays caused to the other two subsets of patients. CONCLUSION: Factors causing delayed presentation are both patient and system related. It is imperative to educate the common people regarding the early signs and symptoms of cancer. At the same time, the system needs to overhaul its efficiency to avoid secondary delays that adversely affect the treatment outcome. An upgradation of the existing oncology facilities in the public sector can achieve this target efficiently.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer treatment; Primary delay; Treatment delay; clinician delay
Authors: Vera Panzarella; Giuseppe Pizzo; Francesco Calvino; Domenico Compilato; Giuseppe Colella; Giuseppina Campisi Journal: Int J Oral Sci Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 6.344
Authors: George Prashanth Kurian; Pritish John Korula; Jubin Merin Jacob; Ashok Madhu Kumar Desha; Reka Karuppusami; Subramani Kandasamy Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2022
Authors: Suhail S Siddiqui; Natesh R Prabu; Harish K Chaudhari; Amit M Narkhede; Satish V Sarode; Ujwal Dhundi; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Atul P Kulkarni Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2021-01