Literature DB >> 26500807

Role of Male Factor Testing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss or In Vitro Fertilization Failure.

Ryan Dickey1, Ranjith Ramasamy2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26500807      PMCID: PMC4617559          DOI: 10.4172/2161-038X.1000e122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Syst Sex Disord


× No keyword cloud information.

Editorial

The appropriate management for male partners of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or recurrent implantation failure during in vitro fertilization (IVF) remains unclear. In particular, men with normal semen parameters are often ignored because the “bulk semen parameters” appear normal [1]. Despite normal semen parameters, male partners in couples with RPL or recurrent implantation failure could have underlying genetic abnormalities in sperm DNA that can be identified. There are a couple of diagnostic tests that we recommend in the evaluation of these men, the first being DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) and the second, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for evaluating sperm aneuploidy. DNA fragmentation occurs due to abnormal packaging of sperm chromatin. Unlike somatic cells that utilize histones as the primary packaging of chromatin, sperm utilize protamines. First, approximately 85% of histones are replaced by protamines, tightly winding chromatin into structures called toroids [2]. In the epididymis, protamines are further compacted by disulfide bond cross-linking. Sperm becomes susceptible to damage if packing with protamines is incomplete. In particular, there are no repair mechanisms that occur once sperm are transported to the epididymis or post ejaculation [3]. High DNA damage as demonstrated by increased DFI is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss, recurrent IVF failure, and increased congenital abnormalities [4,5]. Therefore, men with abnormally elevated DFI can undergo testicular biopsy for sperm retrieval and use with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) because DFI in testicular sperm is significantly lower compared to DFI in ejaculated sperm [6]. There are several DFI assays available, and each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) is commercially available, but the Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay, Halo test, and Comet assay are other options. The second test that can be utilized in men with RPL is sperm aneuploidy testing. Sperm aneuploidy is defined as any deviation from the normal haploid state of sperm. Because many chromosomal aberrations are not viable, clinical testing of sperm aneuploidy has centered on those compatible with survival, namely trisomy 13, 18, 21, X monosomy and Klinefelter (XXY-XXXXY) [7]. The main cause of aneuploidy is nondisjunction, but anaphase lag and ineffective checkpoint control can also contribute to abnormal numbers of chromosomes. Sperm FISH is a cytogenic assay that measures the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities by measuring sperm aneuploidy. FISH can be effective in identifying abnormal sperm aneuploidy in men with RPL and normal sperm parameters. Up to 40% of men with RPL and normal semen parameters had abnormal aneuploidy with FISH [8,9]. Our recommendation for men with increased sperm aneuploidy is to pursue IVF with preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) or early fetal DNA testing in maternal blood. Taken together, both DFI and FISH testing are recommended in the work-up of male factor in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss or recurrent IVF failure. Men with increased DFI in ejaculated sperm may be counseled for a testicular biopsy in combination with ICSI, and those with increased sperm aneuploidy can be advised to undergo IVF combined with PGS.
  9 in total

1.  Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Filomena Scarselli; Marcello Iacobelli; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Ubaldi; Susanna Ferrero; Giorgio Franco; Nazareno Anniballo; Carmen Mendoza; Jan Tesarik
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  DNA damage to spermatozoa has impacts on fertilization and pregnancy.

Authors:  S E M Lewis; R J Aitken
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Introduction: Beyond bulk semen parameters.

Authors:  Mark Sigman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Analysing the sperm epigenome: roles in early embryogenesis and assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Undraga Schagdarsurengin; Agnieszka Paradowska; Klaus Steger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Cell-free fetal DNA levels in pregnancies conceived by IVF.

Authors:  Phillip D Pan; Inga Peter; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; Jacob A Canick; Diana W Bianchi; Kirby L Johnson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization of human sperm: diagnostics, indications, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Stefan Besada; Dolores J Lamb
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization detects increased sperm aneuploidy in men with recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Jason M Scovell; Jason R Kovac; Peter J Cook; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Geoffry N De Iuliis
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 9.  Types, causes, detection and repair of DNA fragmentation in animal and human sperm cells.

Authors:  Clara González-Marín; Jaime Gosálvez; Rosa Roy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison between sperm parameters and chromatin in recurrent pregnancy loss couples after antioxidant therapy.

Authors:  Alireza Nazari; Parvin Sabeti; Soheila Pourmasumi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 2.  Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Rosalie Cabry-Goubet; Florence Scheffler; Naima Belhadri-Mansouri; Stephanie Belloc; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Aviva Devaux; Hickmat Chahine; Jacques De Mouzon; Henri Copin; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.