Literature DB >> 26500334

Immunophenotyping of ampullary carcinomata allows for stratification of treatment specific subgroups.

Joyce M Leo1, Steve E Kalloger2, Renata D Peixoto3, Nadia S Gale4, Douglas L Webber5, David A Owen5, Daniel Renouf6, David F Schaeffer5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ampullary carcinomata (AC) can be separated into intestinal (IT) or pancreatobiliary (PB) subtypes. Although morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular differentiation of IT and PB have been well documented; the prognostic significance of histological subtype and whether patients with either subtype benefit from differential chemotherapeutic regimens remains unclear.
METHODS: As part of a larger cohort study, patients who underwent resection for AC or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathological covariates and outcome were obtained and MUC1, MUC2, CDX2 and CK20 were assessed with immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Of 99 ACs, the resultant immunophenotypes indicated 48% and 22% were IT and PB, respectively. Thirty (30%) cases were quadruple negative (QN). Within the PDAC cohort (N = 257), the most prevalent immunophenotype was QN (53%). Subsequently, all QN ACs were classified as PB immunohistochemically yielding 47.5% and 52.5% classified as IT and PB, respectively. Involved regional lymph nodes and elevated T-stage were significantly associated with PB compared with IT AC (p = 0.0032 and 0.0396, respectively). Progression-free survival revealed inferior survival for PB versus IT AC (p = 0.0156).
CONCLUSIONS: AC can be classified into prognostic groups with unique clinicopathological characteristics using immunohistochemistry. Immunophenotypical similarity of PB and PDAC suggests that treatment regimens similar to those used in PDAC should be explored. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; PANCREAS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26500334     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  5 in total

1.  Clinical, morphologic, and immunophenotypic characteristics of ampullary carcinomas with an emphasis on SMAD4 expression.

Authors:  Ahmad Alkhasawneh; Lizette Vila Duckworth; Thomas J George; Neelam V Desai; Alex J Sommerfeld; Xiaomin Lu; Tania Zuluaga Toro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

2.  Ampullary and pancreatic adenocarcinoma-a comparative study.

Authors:  Marwa Ferchichi; Raja Jouini; Wafa Koubaa; Fatma Khanchel; Imen Helal; Dhafer Hadad; Norsaf Bibani; Aschraf Chadli-Debbiche; Ehsen BenBrahim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-04

Review 3.  Ampullary cancer of intestinal origin and duodenal cancer - A logical clinical and therapeutic subgroup in periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Manju D Chandrasegaram; Anthony J Gill; Jas Samra; Tim Price; John Chen; Jonathan Fawcett; Neil D Merrett
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10-15

4.  Prognostic Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Duodenal Adenocarcinoma With Survival: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Huapeng Sun; Yi Liu; Long Lv; Jingwen Li; Xiaofeng Liao; Wei Gong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  KRAS, NRAS and BRAF analysis of ampullary adenocarcinoma classified using CK7, CK20, MUC1 and MUC2.

Authors:  Marwa Ferchichi; Raja Jouini; Imen Ayari; Wafa Koubaa; Aschraf Chadli-Debbiche; Ehsen BenBrahim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.