| Literature DB >> 26499132 |
Zhipeng Fan1, Yanhui Gao, Wei Wang, Hongqiang Gong, Min Guo, Shengcheng Zhao, Xuehui Liu, Bing Yu, Dianjun Sun.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of brick tea-type fluorosis is high in Tibet because of the habit of drinking brick tea in this region. Brick tea-type fluorosis has become an urgent public health problem in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26499132 PMCID: PMC4728115 DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20150037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Epidemiol ISSN: 0917-5040 Impact factor: 3.211
Fluoride exposure from drinking brick tea
| District | Volume of brick-tea consumed daily (L) | Fluoride concentrations in brick-tea infusion (mg/L) | Average daily fluoride intake from drinking brick-tea (mg) | |||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||
| Lhasa | 115 | 3.20 (2.50–3.20) | 112 | 8.30 (6.53–9.64) | 112 | 26.56 (17.26–31.17) |
| Ali | 107 | 6.00 (3.20–6.40)a | 103 | 6.93 (3.45–11.69) | 103 | 29.95 (17.41–58.56) |
| Nagqu | 311 | 6.00 (3.20–6.50)a | 296 | 10.92 (9.61–12.16)a,b | 287 | 55.42 (33.60–77.83)a,b |
| Shigatse | 124 | 3.20 (2.00–3.43)b,c | 108 | 2.09 (1.04–7.82)a,b,c | 108 | 6.77 (2.25–19.90)a,b,c |
| Shannan | 321 | 2.40 (2.00–3.20)a,b,c | 296 | 9.18 (6.52–10.33)c,d | 295 | 21.48 (13.66–31.78)b,c,d |
| Linzhi | 199 | 2.40 (1.50–3.20)a,b,c | 182 | 5.81 (2.43–7.86)a,b,c,e | 180 | 9.97 (3.78–21.96)a,b,c,e |
| Changdu | 135 | 4.80 (3.20–6.40)a,d,e,f | 130 | 4.96 (4.07–4.96)a,b,c,e | 129 | 24.61 (14.11–31.75)c,d,f |
| Total | 1312 | 3.20 (2.40–6.00) | 1227 | 8.29 (4.96–10.81) | 1214 | 24.73 (12.16–41.57) |
IQR, interquartile range.
The Kruskal-Wallis H test and Nemenyi test were used to compare differences in fluoride exposure among districts.
aP < 0.05, Compared with Lhasa.
bP < 0.05, Compared with Ali.
cP < 0.05, Compared with Nagqu.
dP < 0.05, Compared with Shigatse.
eP < 0.05, Compared with Shannan.
fP < 0.05, Compared with Linzhi.
Urinary concentrations of fluoride in children and adults
| District | Urinary fluoride concentrations in children (mg/L) | Urinary fluoride concentrations in adult (mg/L) | ||||||
| Geometric mean | Median | Range | Geometric mean | Median | Range | |||
| Lhasa | 85 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.17–5.90 | 109 | 1.61 | 1.60 | 0.27–6.44 |
| Ali* | — | — | — | — | 105 | 3.21 | 3.19a | 0.73–13.04 |
| Nagqu | 62 | 1.03 | 1.17a | 0.23–3.15 | 309 | 1.82 | 1.86b | 0.31–8.33 |
| Shigatse | 116 | 0.70 | 0.69c | 0.15–2.04 | 122 | 0.94 | 1.02a,b,c | 0.13–6.25 |
| Shannan | 107 | 0.65 | 0.67c | 0.11–2.76 | 311 | 1.54 | 1.68b,d | 0.24–6.97 |
| Linzhi | 13 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.24–2.35 | 195 | 1.05 | 1.11a,b,c,e | 0.14–12.46 |
| Changdu | 33 | 1.33 | 1.26a,d,e | 0.47–4.43 | 136 | 2.57 | 2.50a,c,d,e,f | 0.56–10.66 |
| Total | 416 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.11–5.90 | 1287 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 0.13–13.04 |
Investigations were not done in children in Ali due to bad traffic conditions.
The Kruskal-Wallis H test and Nemenyi test were used to compare differences in urinary concentrations of fluoride in children and adults among districts.
aP < 0.05, Compared with Lhasa.
bP < 0.05, Compared with Ali.
cP < 0.05, Compared with Nagqu.
dP < 0.05, Compared with Shigatse.
eP < 0.05, Compared with Shannan.
fP < 0.05, Compared with Linzhi.
Prevalence of dental fluorosis among children aged 8–12 years
| District | Normal | Questionable | DF | Prevalence | DF | Prevalent | |||||
| Very mild | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total | |||||||
| Lhasa | 87 | 42 | 6 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 39 | 44.83 | 0.86 | Mild |
| Nagqu | 63 | 29 | 2 | 9 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 50.79 | 0.89 | Mild |
| Shigatse | 118 | 85 | 0 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 33 | 27.97 | 0.45 | Edge |
| Shannan | 109 | 53 | 28 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 25.69 | 0.53 | Edge |
| Linzhi | 13 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23.08 | 0.27 | Negative |
| Changdu | 33 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 21.21 | 0.55 | Edge |
| Total | 423 | 234 | 47 | 59 | 70 | 11 | 2 | 142 | 33.57 | 0.62 | Mild |
DF, dental fluorosis.
aDental fluorosis (DF) index is a dynamic index that indicates the prevalent strength of dental fluorosis in a district quantitatively. DF index = (number of questionable DF × 0.5 + number of very mild DF × 1 + number of mild DF × 2 + number of moderate DF × 3 + number of severe DF × 4)/total number of participants surveyed.
bIndicates the severity of this disease in the district.
Skeletal fluorosis prevalence among adults
| District | The Median Altitude (m) | Clinical diagnosis of SF | ||||
| Number of SF cases (%) | I (%) | II (%) | III (%) | |||
| Lhasa | 3658 | 115 | 68 (59.13) | 25 (21.74) | 43 (37.39) | 0 (0) |
| Ali | 4500 | 107 | 80 (74.77) | 25 (23.36) | 53 (49.53) | 2 (1.87) |
| Nagqu | 4500 | 315 | 215 (68.25) | 84 (26.67) | 127 (40.32) | 4 (1.27) |
| Shigatse | 4000 | 124 | 44 (35.48) | 19 (15.32) | 24 (19.35) | 1 (0.81) |
| Shannan | 3700 | 322 | 89 (27.64) | 36 (11.18) | 52 (16.15) | 1 (0.31) |
| Linzhi | 3100 | 201 | 40 (19.90) | 18 (8.96) | 22 (10.95) | 0 (0) |
| Changdu | 3500 | 136 | 72 (52.94) | 21 (15.11) | 47 (34.56) | 4 (2.94) |
| Total | 3851 | 1320 | 608 (46.06) | 228 (17.27) | 368 (27.88) | 12 (0.91) |
SF, skeletal fluorosis.
Fluoride exposure in different occupational groups and clinical diagnosis of skeletal fluorosis
| Occupational | Volume of brick-tea | Fluoride concentrations | Average daily fluoride intake | |||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||
| Herdsmen | 418 | 6.00 (3.20–6.43) | 398 | 10.81 (8.62–12.16) | 390 | 48.45 (26.58–74.83) |
| Farmers | 884 | 3.20 (2.00–3.20)a | 818 | 6.77 (4.04–9.55)a | 814 | 19.13 (9.04–29.92)a |
| Others | 10 | 1.95 (1.15–3.20)a | 11 | 7.36 (2.09–9.99)a | 10 | 8.21 (3.93–20.69)a |
| Total | 1312 | 3.20 (2.40–6.00) | 1227 | 8.29 (4.96–10.81) | 1214 | 24.73 (12.16–41.57) |
IQR, interquartile range; SF, skeletal fluorosis.
The Kruskal-Wallis H test and Chi-square test were used to compare differences in fluoride exposure and severity of skeletal fluorosis among different professional groups.
aP < 0.05, Compared with herdsmen.