| Literature DB >> 26498838 |
Daniel Delitto1, Brian S Black2, Heather L Sorenson3, Andrea E Knowlton4, Ryan M Thomas5,6, George A Sarosi7,8, Lyle L Moldawer9, Kevin E Behrns10, Chen Liu11, Thomas J George12, Jose G Trevino13, Shannon M Wallet14, Steven J Hughes15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tumor microenvironment impacts pancreatic cancer (PC) development, progression and metastasis. How intratumoral inflammatory mediators modulate this biology remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that the inflammatory milieu within the PC microenvironment would correlate with clinicopathologic findings and survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26498838 PMCID: PMC4619553 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1820-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Inflammatory milieu within pancreatic tissue is predictive of malignancy
| Normal pancreas ( | Pancreatitis ( | Pancreatic cancer ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth factors | |||||
| FGF-2 | 761 (221) | 951 (187) | 1674 (177) | .009 | .063 |
| PDGF-BB | 117 (46) | 102 (48) | 244 (63) | .026 | .022 |
| VEGF | 151 (46) | 76 (20) | 252 (59) | .119 | .046 |
| Chemokines | |||||
| Eotaxin | 21.8 (12.8) | 21.4 (12.9) | 90.4 (16.3) | <.001 | .002 |
| Fractalkine | 55.1 (12.8) | 43.0 (9.4) | 71.1 (3.6) | .010 | .009 |
| Gro | 163 (67) | 463 (296) | 531 (87) | .007 | .043 |
| IP-10 | 69 (33) | 70 (32) | 620 (148) | <.001 | <.001 |
| MCP1 | 437 (136) | 378 (104) | 1615 (302) | <.001 | <.001 |
| MCP3 | 4.7 (1.9) | 2.5 (0.8) | 16.6 (2.8) | <.001 | <.001 |
| MDC | 27 (11) | 70 (36) | 143 (17) | <.001 | .009 |
| MIP-1α | 14.3 (4.9) | 16.9 (7.6) | 37.9 (4.6) | .001 | .009 |
| MIP-1β | 22.1 (9.4) | 14.3 (5.0) | 38.4 (6.1) | .007 | .008 |
| RANTES | 766 (261) | 1066 (228) | 1929 (235) | .032 | .178 |
| Cytokines | |||||
| GM-CSF | 4.1 (2.0) | 1.4 (0.3) | 14.0 (3.9) | <.001 | <.001 |
| IFNα2 | 13.0 (2.7) | 8.7 (2.3) | 19.9 (2.4) | .013 | .012 |
| IL-1α | 1.8 (0.5) | 3.2 (0.6) | 12.2 (2.0) | <.001 | .003 |
| IL-1RA | 157 (144) | 46 (21) | 500 (96) | <.001 | <.001 |
| IL-1β | 0.6 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.1) | 1.3 (0.2) | .032 | .262 |
| IL-6 | 13.3 (5.3) | 5.8 (2.1) | 71.8 (23.3) | <.001 | <.001 |
| IL-7 | 3.9 (1.0) | 4.5 (1.0) | 10.4 (0.8) | <.001 | <.001 |
| IL-8 | 160 (154) | 61 (37) | 848 (161) | <.001 | .002 |
| IL-15 | 1.7 (0.2) | 2.0 (0.3) | 3.5 (0.4) | .001 | .021 |
| TNFα | 1.6 (0.7) | 1.4 (0.4) | 3.3 (0.4) | .002 | .010 |
Concentrations expressed as mean (SE) in units of pg/mg protein. All significant comparisons are shown for which P < 0.05 using the Mann Whitney U test
Intratumoral milieu correlates with the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy
| Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| No ( | Yes ( | ||
| Flt3L | 15.9 (1.6) | 24.0 (3.5) | .005 |
| IL-1α | 15.0 (2.6) | 5.0 (0.9) | .006 |
| IL-8 | 1129 (197) | 114 (35) | .003 |
All significant comparisons are shown for which P < 0.05 using the Mann Whitney U test
Fig. 1Th1-associated cytokines within the tumor microenvironment correlate with treatment resistance in PC. Distributions are displayed comparing intratumoral concentrations of a IL-1β and b TNFα in homogenates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with histopathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Bars represent mean values with standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05 for each association using the Mann Whitney U test
Inflammatory milieu within the tumor microenvironment correlates with clinicopathologic parameters in PC specimens
| Clinical parameter | Ligand | Spearman coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Lymph Node Ratio | EGF | .332 | .048 |
| IL-4 | -.377 | .023 | |
| CA 19–9 (U/mL) | IFN-ɤ | .391 | .022 |
| RANTES | .475 | .005 | |
| Tumor Size (cm) | IL-8 | .336 | .045 |
| IP-10 | .357 | .033 |
All significant comparisons are shown for which P < 0.05
Fig. 2Inflammatory milieu within the tumor microenvironment correlates with tumor grade. Intratumoral concentrations of a GM-CSF, b IL-8 and c IL-15 demonstrated significant correlations with high tumor grade. *P < 0.05 for each association using the Mann Whitney U test
Univariate analysis of overall survival
| HR | 95 % CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 1.01 | 0.98–1.05 | .556 |
| Neoadjuvant Therapy | 1.08 | 0.43–2.68 | .870 |
| CA 19–9 (kU/mL) | 1.38 | 0.83–2.29 | .215 |
| Major Vascular Resection | 2.66 | 0.85–8.30 | .093 |
| R1 Resection | 1.96 | 0.84–4.53 | .118 |
| Positive Lymph Node Ratio | 55.8 | 4.35–714 | .002* |
| Poor Tumor Differentiation | 2.28 | 0.99–5.23 | .053 |
| Tumor Size (cm) | 1.06 | 0.89–1.28 | .506 |
Clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model for 36 patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abbreviations: HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, y years, R1 resection denotes a microscopically positive margin; Positive lymph node ratio refers to the number of lymph nodes positive for malignancy divided by the total number of lymph nodes examined; cm centimeters. *, P < .05
Soluble mediators detected within the PC microenvironment correlate with prognosis
| Dichotomized at median concentration | Univariate PH model | Multivariate PH model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median OS (Low) | Median OS (High) | HR (95 % CI) | HR (95 % CI) | ||||
| EGF | 10.4 | 11.0 | .165 | 1.23 (0.98–1.54) | .078 | 1.10 (.86–1.42) | .439 |
| G-CSF | 18.3 | 7.5 | .064 | 1.03 (1.01–1.06) | .016* | 1.02 (1.00–1.05) | .071 |
| PDGF-AA | 18.7 | 8.9 | .170 | 3.51 (1.32–9.31) | .012* | 2.72 (1.00–7.40) | .050* |
| IL-6 | 11.0 | 10.4 | .500 | 12.0 (0.85–172) | .066 | 6.10 (0.39–96.13) | .198 |
| FGF-2 | 7.1 | 20.7 | .010* | 0.60 (0.37–0.97) | .038* | 0.59 (0.37–0.93) | .024* |
| TNFα | 7.5 | 18.3 | .085 | 0.78 (0.63–0.98) | .031* | 0.79 (0.64–0.97) | .027* |
| MIP-1α | 10.4 | 14.9 | .352 | 0.98 (0.96–1.00) | .036* | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | .029* |
| IL-4 | 7.6 | 20.7 | .008* | 0.85 (0.70–1.04) | .112 | 0.26 (0.75–1.08) | .902 |
| Flt-3 L | 7.1 | 18.7 | .037* | 0.95 (0.88–1.01) | .103 | 0.94 (0.86–1.02) | .113 |
| MDC | 7.6 | 20.7 | .049* | 0.01 (0–1.37) | .065 | 0.01 (0–2.24) | .098 |
| Eotaxin | 7.5 | 18.7 | .055 | 0.03 (0–15.2) | .263 | 0.09 (0–47.9) | .454 |
Soluble mediators were dichotomized at median concentrations and survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis with P values determined using the log-rank test (left). Associations between soluble mediator concentrations and survival were then evaluated in a continuous fashion using a Cox proportional hazards model (middle). Finally, concentrations were evaluated in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with positive lymph node ratio (right). Abbreviations: PH proportional hazards, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. *, P < .05
Fig. 3Elements of the inflammatory milieu within the tumor microenvironment have prognostic value. Kaplan-Meier curves are plotted for a FGF-2, b MDC, c Flt-3 L and d IL-4 based on cutoffs at median cytokine concentrations in 36 pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens. The log-rank test was used to compare differences. Significance was considered for those in which P < 0.05