Literature DB >> 26498808

Stakeholder consultations and opportunities for integrating socio-behavioural factors into the pesticide risk analysis process.

Maura Calliera, Alex Marchis, Gabriele Sacchettini, Ettore Capri.   

Abstract

The pesticide risk analysis process is well regulated in the EU, especially in relation to placing on the market authorisation procedures, but in order to avoid risks for human health and environment in the use phase, information on how these substances are employed and on socio-behavioural factors that can influence the exposure have to be taken into account. To better explore reasons about the gap between risk assessment and risk management, within the EU FP7 Health and Environmental Risks: Organisation, Integration and Cross-fertilisation of Scientific Knowledge (HEROIC) project, a stepwise stakeholder's consultation process was developed using a mixed approach in two different phases (survey and roundtable). We elicited stakeholder views regarding factors that could limit the pesticide risk assessment phase linked on how the knowledge is produced and the way the data are used in risk management and in risk communication, also taking into account qualitative factors such as responsibility, trust and behaviours, which could have impact on risk assessment policies. Activities deployed indicate that some changes and interaction are needed to better define the problems at the formulation stage, and the type of information risk assessor has to provide, to better inform risk manager in addressing different societal needs, to strengthen the credibility of the process of risk assessment and improve the effectiveness of policies. Integrations between disciplines may initially increase the complexity but in turn will provide a better and more useful estimation of the risk, reinforce transparency and drive a more efficient use of risk management resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26498808     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5553-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  7 in total

1.  Evidence maps: communicating risk assessments in societal controversies: the case of engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Peter Wiedemann; Holger Schütz; Albena Spangenberg; Harald F Krug
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA).

Authors:  Peter M Wiedemann; Franziska Boerner; Gregor Dürrenberger; Jimmy Estenberg; Shaiela Kandel; Eric van Rongen; Evi Vogel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals.

Authors:  M F Wilks; N Roth; L Aicher; M Faust; P Papadaki; A Marchis; M Calliera; A Ginebreda; S Andres; R Kühne; G Schüürmann
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Perceptions of pesticides exposure risks by operators, workers, residents and bystanders in Greece, Italy and the UK.

Authors:  K Remoundou; M Brennan; G Sacchettini; L Panzone; M C Butler-Ellis; E Capri; A Charistou; E Chaideftou; M G Gerritsen-Ebben; K Machera; P Spanoghe; R Glass; A Marchis; K Doanngoc; A Hart; L J Frewer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  New risk indicator approach for Operators, Workers, Bystanders and Residents for a sustainable use of plant protection products.

Authors:  Gabriele Sacchettini; Maura Calliera; Alexandru Marchis; Richard Glass; Clare Butler Ellis; Kyriaki Machera; Rianda Gerritsen-Ebben; Pieter Spanoghe; Ettore Capri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis.

Authors:  A R R Péry; G Schüürmann; P Ciffroy; M Faust; T Backhaus; L Aicher; E Mombelli; C Tebby; M T D Cronin; S Tissot; S Andres; J M Brignon; L Frewer; S Georgiou; K Mattas; J C Vergnaud; W Peijnenburg; E Capri; A Marchis; M F Wilks
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks.

Authors:  David J Briggs
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.