In order to investigate the effects of SKF96365 (SKF), which is a non-selective cationic channel blocker, on K(+) channel currents, we recorded currents through ATP sensitive K(+) (IKATP), voltage-gated K(+) (IKv) and Ca(2+) activated K(+) channels (IBK) in the absence and presence of SKF in single small intestinal myocytes of mice with patch-clamp techniques. SKF (10 µM) reversibly abolished IKATP that was induced by cromakalim (10 µM), which is a selective ATP sensitive K(+) channel opener. These inhibitory effects were induced in a concentration-dependent and voltage-independent manner. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 0.85 µM, which was obviously lower than that reported for the muscarinic cationic current. In addition, SKF (1 µM ≈ the IC50 value in IKATP suppression) reversibly inhibited the IKv that was induced by repetitive depolarizing pulses from -80 to 20 mV. However, the extent of the inhibitory effects was only ~30%. In contrast, SKF (1 µM) had no significant effects on spontaneous transient IBK and caffeine-induced IBK. These results indicated that SKF inhibited ATP sensitive K(+) channels and voltage-gated K(+) channels, with the ATP sensitive K(+) channels being more sensitive than the voltage-gated K(+) channels. These inhibitory effects on K(+) channels should be considered when SKF is used as a cationic channel blocker.
In order to investigate the effects of SKF96365 (SKF), which is a non-selective cationic channel blocker, on K(+) channel currents, we recorded currents through ATP sensitive K(+) (IKATP), voltage-gated K(+) (IKv) and Ca(2+) activated K(+) channels (IBK) in the absence and presence of SKF in single small intestinal myocytes of mice with patch-clamp techniques. SKF (10 µM) reversibly abolished IKATP that was induced by cromakalim (10 µM), which is a selective ATP sensitive K(+) channel opener. These inhibitory effects were induced in a concentration-dependent and voltage-independent manner. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 0.85 µM, which was obviously lower than that reported for the muscarinic cationic current. In addition, SKF (1 µM ≈ the IC50 value in IKATP suppression) reversibly inhibited the IKv that was induced by repetitive depolarizing pulses from -80 to 20 mV. However, the extent of the inhibitory effects was only ~30%. In contrast, SKF (1 µM) had no significant effects on spontaneous transient IBK and caffeine-induced IBK. These results indicated that SKF inhibited ATP sensitive K(+) channels and voltage-gated K(+) channels, with the ATP sensitive K(+) channels being more sensitive than the voltage-gated K(+) channels. These inhibitory effects on K(+) channels should be considered when SKF is used as a cationic channel blocker.
In gastrointestinal smooth muscles, the stimulation of muscarinic receptors by cholinergic agonists, including
acetylcholine, increases the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i), which
results in a contractile response [45]. The increase in
[Ca2+]i is induced by the Ca2+ release from internal stores and Ca2+
entry into the cell through L-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (CaV1.2). The activation of
CaV1.2 can be achieved by depolarization due to muscarinic stimulation of non-selective cationic
channels [18, 23, 50]. Cationic channels are thought to consist of transient potential canonical
channels 4 and 6 (TRPC4 and 6) [43], which are also permeable to
Ca2+ and involved in Ca2+ entry [47]. In addition,
muscarinic receptors directly or indirectly regulate the activities of K+ channels that are expressed
in gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells, including ATP sensitive K+ (KATP), voltage-gated
K+ (KV) and large conductance Ca2+ activated K+ (BK) channels,
through which the electrical activities of the muscles are modulated [5,
6, 12, 14, 20].SKF96365 (SKF) is an imidazole compound that inhibits receptor-mediated Ca2+ entry [27]. SKF has been reported to inhibit the opening of TRPC channels in
guinea-pig [52] and mouse ileal cells [9]. Although other inhibitors of TRPC channels, such as quinine, quinidine, La3+ and
flufenamic acid, are well known [9, 15, 24], these chemicals are not specific for the TRPC channels.
Therefore, in investigations of the physiological and pharmacological properties of muscarinic receptor-gated TRPC
channels, SKF has been widely used as a channel inhibitor in gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells [9, 26, 52]. However, it has been reported that application of SKF evoked membrane depolarization in
gastrointestinal smooth muscles [15, 51], indicating additional effects of SKF on ion channels other than TRPC channels. The depolarizing
action can make it more difficult to analyze the physiological roles of TRPC channels. Schwarz et
al. [36] have suggested that SKF blocks inwardly and outwardly
rectifying K+ currents in endothelial cells (IC50; ≥40 µM). Thus, it is
possible that SKF can block K+ channels that are expressed in gastrointestinal smooth muscles together
with TRPC channels, thus resulting in membrane depolarization. However, the effects of SKF on the activities of
the K+ channels that are expressed in gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells remain to be elucidated. In
the present study, we investigated the effects of SKF on the currents through the KATP
(IKATP), KV (IKv) and BK (IBK) channels in longitudinal smooth
muscle cells that were isolated from mouse small intestine, which have often been used to investigate the
activation mechanisms of TRPC channels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The nomenclature of the ion channels was in accordance with Alexander et al. [2]. All of the animal care and experimental procedures described below
complied with the guidelines of the local animal ethics committee of the Faculty of Life Sciences, Kyoto Sangyo
University.Cell preparation: Mice (hybrid of 129S4 or 129S6 and CF1) of either sex who were above
2-month-old and who weighed (mean ± standard deviation) 25.1 ± 3.0 g were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. A
15-cm-long gut segment was then removed from the region over the jejunum and ileum, except for the 2.0-cm
terminal portion, and placed in physiological salt solution (PSS; for composition, see below). The gut segment
was cut into 1.0- to 1.5-cm pieces, and the longitudinal muscle layer was carefully peeled off from each of the
pieces. Single smooth muscle cells were isolated enzymatically from the longitudinal muscle layers as described
previously [40]. The cells were suspended in PSS containing 0.5 mM
CaCl2. A small aliquot was placed on coverglass and stored at 4°C for 2–7 hr until its use on the
same day.Whole-cell current recording: Whole-cell membrane current recordings were performed at room
temperature (21–25°C) with standard patch-clamp techniques [11] with 4–7
MΩ patch pipettes. The current signals were amplified with a current amplifier (CEZ-2300 or 5100, Nihon Kohden
Corp., Tokyo, Japan) filtered at 1 KHz and captured at a sampling rate of 4 KHz with an analog-digital converter
(Digidata 1440A, Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A.) that was interfaced with a computer (Think
Centre A58 Small, Lenovo, Morrisville, NC, U.S.A.) that was running the pCLAMP program (version 10, Molecular
Devices, LLC).For the IKATP recordings, the cells were bathed in a 60-mM K+ solution and
intracellularly dialyzed with a K+-rich high BAPTA pipette solution (for compositions, see below) at
a holding potential of −80 mV in order to increase the driving force of K+ and minimize the
activities of the KV and BK channels [12, 20, 31]. Under these conditions, the
K+ equilibrium potential (EK) was estimated at −21 mV, and the K+ currents
were inwardly activated. IKv was recorded in cells that was bathed in Ca2+-free PSS (for
composition, see below) and dialyzed with the K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution in order to
minimize the currents through the BK and CaV1.2 channels. The whole-cell voltage clamp mode was held
at −80 mV, and 2 sec step pulses to 20 mV that were generated by the pCLAMP program were repeatedly applied to
the cell every 20 sec to elicit IKv. When currents were recorded through IBK, a
K+-rich low EGTA pipette solution (for composition, see below) was used. The cells were bathed in
PSS and held at a holding potential of 0 mV. Recordings of the muscarinic cationic channel currents
(mITRPC) were made from cells that were bathed in Cs+-rich external solution and
intracellularly dialyzed with Cs+-rich pipette solution (for compositions, see below) at a holding
potential of −60 mV in order to eliminate any K+ currents.Solutions: The PSS that was used in the experiments had the following composition (mM): NaCl,
126; KCl, 6; CaCl2, 2; MgCl2, 1.2; glucose, 14; and HEPES, 10.5; and the pH was adjusted
to 7.2 with NaOH. The 60-mM K+ solution was made by changing the concentrations of NaCl and KCl in
the PSS to 72 mM and 60 mM, respectively. If necessary, the KCl in the 60-mM K+ solution was replaced
with CsCl. The Ca2+-free PSS was prepared by omitting CaCl2 from the PSS and adding 0.5 mM
EGTA. The Cs+-rich external solution had the following composition (mM): CsCl, 120; glucose, 12; and
HEPES, 10; and the pH was adjusted to pH 7.4 with CsOH. The compositions of each patch-pipette solution (mM)
were as follows. The K+-rich low-EGTA pipette solution contained KCl, 134; Na2GTP, 1.0;
MgCl2, 1.2; MgATP, 1.0; glucose, 14; EGTA, 0.05; and HEPES, 10.5; and the pH was adjusted to 7.2
with KOH. For the K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution, CaCl2 was removed, and 20 mM BAPTA
was added. In this case, in order to adjust the total concentration of K+ to 134 mM and the pH to
7.2, the concentration of KCl was reduced to ~67 mM, and KOH was added. The Cs+-rich pipette solution
contained CsCl, 80; Na2GTP, 1.0; creatine, 5; MgATP, 1.0; glucose, 20; HEPES, 10; BAPTA, 10; and
CaCl2, 4.6 (calculated free calcium=100 nM), with the pH adjusted to 7.4 with CsOH.Drugs: The following drugs were used:
1-[2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-2-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propoxy]ethyl-1H-imidazole hydrochloride (SKF), cromakalim (Tocris
Bioscience, Bristol, U.K.), carbamylcholine chloride (CCh), glibenclamide (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, St. Louis, MO,
U.S.A.), tetraethylammonium Chloride (TEA; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and caffeine (Wako
Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Cromakalim and glibenclamide were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
to form a stock solution and was stored at −20°C. The drug concentrations herein are expressed as the final
concentrations that were applied to the cells.Data analysis: The amplitude of IKATP that was induced by cromakalim was measured,
and the difference in the current level after the application of glibenclamide (10 µM) was
calculated. In order to determine the current-voltage (I-V) relationships of IKATP, a 350-msec ramp
pulse that ranged from −100 mV to 60 mV was applied to the cells before and after SKF application, and the I-V
curves were constructed by subtracting the current after the application of glibenclamide from the current in
the presence of cromakalim alone or with SKF [31]. The amplitude of
IKv was measured by subtracting the leakage component from the outward current that was induced by
the depolarizing pulses [44]. The leakage component was estimated in each
experiment as follows. A 10-mV hyperpolarizing pulse was applied to the cells at the holding potential (−40 mV),
and the amplitude of the current was considered the leakage current for the 10-mV step. The leakage current that
corresponded to the 100-mV depolarizing step pulse was subtracted from each of the outward currents that were
evoked by the depolarizing pulse. The amplitudes of the spontaneous transient outward IBK (STOC) and
caffeine-induced IBK were calculated as the difference from the holding current. The amplitude of
mITRPC was calculated as the difference from the holding current before the application of CCh. The
extent of the SKF-induced inhibition of each current was expressed as the percentage reduction from the control
current level immediately before its application.The values are presented herein as mean ± S.E.M. The statistical significance of the difference between two
groups was tested with a Student’s unpaired or paired t-test. When multiple groups were
compared, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) that was followed by a posthoc Bonferroni-type multiple
comparison test was used. The differences were considered significant when the P values were less than 0.05. The
averaged curves that represented the relationship between the concentration of SKF and its inhibitory effects
were constructed by curve fitting with GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, U.S.A.), and
these provided the SKF concentration that was required to produce half maximal inhibition (IC50). The
cells that were obtained from male and female mice showed similar amplitudes for IKATP,
IKv, STOC and mITRPC.
RESULTS
Current through the K: The
cells were dialyzed with the K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution and bathed in the 60-mM
K+ external solution at a holding potential of −80 mV. Under these conditions, application of the
KATP channel opener cromakalim (10 µM) induced an inward current, as has been
reported by Nuttle & Farley [31]. The current developed progressively
with time and reached a plateau about 1–3 min later (Fig. 1A). Further application of the KATP channel inhibitor, glibenclamide (10 µM),
almost completely abolished the current. The mean amplitude of the cromakalim-induced current was −895.2 ± 66.5
pA (n=39). When the extracellular K+ in the bath solution was completely replaced with
Cs+, the cromakalim-induced inward current was immediately abolished at −80 mV (n=5; data not shown).
The I-V relationships of the cromakalim-induced current were determined by applying a voltage ramp pulse that
ranged from −100 mV up to +60 mV over 350 msec (Fig. 1Ba). As shown in
Fig 1Bb, the I-V curve was linear across the voltages tested. The
polarity of the current was reversed at −18.8 ± 2.0 mV (n=7), which corresponded to the estimated EK
of −21 mV, thus indicating that this current was carried through K+ channels. These results indicated
that the cromakalim-induced current was carried through KATP channels.
Fig. 1.
Characterization of cromakalim-induced KATP channel currents (IKATP) in single
longitudinal smooth muscle cells isolated from mouse small intestine. Cells were dialyzed with the
K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution and bathed in the 60-mM K+ external solution
at a holding potential of −80 mV. Cromakalim (10 µM) was extracellularly applied to the
cells. A: a typical example of the cromakalim-induced sustained inward IKATP. B shows the
current-voltage (I-V) relationship of cromakalim-induced IKATP. (a): a typical current trace,
where a voltage ramp pulse from −100 mV up to +60 mV over 350 msec was applied in the presence of
cromakalim alone (current a) and in combination with glibenclamide (10 µM) (current b).
(b): the I-V curve constructed by subtraction of the current b from the current a.
Characterization of cromakalim-induced KATP channel currents (IKATP) in single
longitudinal smooth muscle cells isolated from mouse small intestine. Cells were dialyzed with the
K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution and bathed in the 60-mM K+ external solution
at a holding potential of −80 mV. Cromakalim (10 µM) was extracellularly applied to the
cells. A: a typical example of the cromakalim-induced sustained inward IKATP. B shows the
current-voltage (I-V) relationship of cromakalim-induced IKATP. (a): a typical current trace,
where a voltage ramp pulse from −100 mV up to +60 mV over 350 msec was applied in the presence of
cromakalim alone (current a) and in combination with glibenclamide (10 µM) (current b).
(b): the I-V curve constructed by subtraction of the current b from the current a.SKF reversibly suppressed the K: After the
cromakalim-induced IKATP reached a steady level, SKF (10 µM) was applied in the
presence of cromakalim. As shown in Fig. 2A, SKF rapidly decreased the amplitude of IKATP and abolished the current within about 1 min.
The time constant (τ) of the suppression (7.3 ± 1.6 sec, n=7) was significantly shorter than the value (35.6 ±
5.8 sec, n=10) in the glibenclamide-induced abolition of IKATP. The removal of SKF from the bath
solution allowed the recovery of IKATP with a slower time course. Figure 2Ba shows a typical example of IKATP suppression that was induced by cumulative
applications of SKF with a series of ascending concentrations (0.03–10 µM). The inhibitory
effects increased with increasing SKF concentrations, and the maximal inhibition was attained at 10
µM. The mean IC50 value that was estimated by the curve fitting of the data from
each myocyte was 0.85 ± 0.12 µM (n=6) (Fig. 2Bb).
Fig. 2.
Effects of SKF96365 (SKF) on cromakalim-induced IKATP. IKATP was induced by
cromakalim (10 µM) in the cells under the same condition as those mentioned in Fig. 1. A shows a typical current trace when SKF (10
µM) was extracellularly applied to the cell in the presence of cromakalim (10
µM). B shows a relationship between concentration of SKF and its inhibitory effect on
IKATP. (a): a typical example of the IKATP suppression induced by cumulative
application of SKF (0.03-10 µM). (b): the averaged concentration-inhibition curve of
IKATP. Each point indicates the mean ± S.E.M. of measurements in 6 cells. C shows a voltage
sensitivity of the SKF-induced IKATP suppression. (a): a typical example of IKATP
suppression induced by SKF (1 µM), where a voltage ramp pulse from −100 mV up to +60 mV
over 350 msec was applied in the presence of cromakalim (10 µM) alone (current a),
cromakalim + SKF (1 µM) (current b) and those agents together with glibenclamide (10
µM) (current c). (b): the I-V curves constructed by subtraction of the current c from
the current a or b. (c): the mean percentage of IKATP suppression at each holding potential.
Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of cells used are presented in parenthesis.
Effects of SKF96365 (SKF) on cromakalim-induced IKATP. IKATP was induced by
cromakalim (10 µM) in the cells under the same condition as those mentioned in Fig. 1. A shows a typical current trace when SKF (10
µM) was extracellularly applied to the cell in the presence of cromakalim (10
µM). B shows a relationship between concentration of SKF and its inhibitory effect on
IKATP. (a): a typical example of the IKATP suppression induced by cumulative
application of SKF (0.03-10 µM). (b): the averaged concentration-inhibition curve of
IKATP. Each point indicates the mean ± S.E.M. of measurements in 6 cells. C shows a voltage
sensitivity of the SKF-induced IKATP suppression. (a): a typical example of IKATP
suppression induced by SKF (1 µM), where a voltage ramp pulse from −100 mV up to +60 mV
over 350 msec was applied in the presence of cromakalim (10 µM) alone (current a),
cromakalim + SKF (1 µM) (current b) and those agents together with glibenclamide (10
µM) (current c). (b): the I-V curves constructed by subtraction of the current c from
the current a or b. (c): the mean percentage of IKATP suppression at each holding potential.
Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of cells used are presented in parenthesis.In order to investigate the voltage dependency of the SKF-induced IKATP suppression, the ramp pulses
were applied in the absence and presence of SKF (1 µM), and the I-V curves were obtained, as
shown in Fig. 2Ca. The I-V curves of IKATP remained linear,
and the reversal potential was almost unchanged after the application of SKF (cromakalim alone, −18.5 ± 0.82 mV
and cromakalim with SKF, −16.4 ± 0.97 mV; n=6) (Fig. 2Cb).
IKATP suppression at −80, −40 and 40 mV was comparable (Fig.
2Cc). These results indicated that the SKF-induced IKATP suppression was
voltage-independent.Comparison of the SKF-induced mI: The cells that were bathed in the Cs+-rich external solution were clamped at
a voltage of −60 mV with patch pipettes that were filled with the Cs+-rich pipette solution in order
to block any K+ currents ([Ca2+]i buffered to 100 nM). Under these conditions,
the application of CCh (100 µM) induced an inward mITRPC, as previously reported by
Sakamoto et al. [34]. SKF (10 µM),
which completely abolished IKATP, was applied to the bath solution in the presence of CCh when the
mITRPC reached a steady level. The amplitude of the mITRPC gradually decreased after the
application of SKF and reached a plateau about 1 min later (Fig.
3Aa). However, the mean suppression of mITRPC was only 55.5 ± 5.6% (n=8) (Fig. 3B). The time constant (τ) of the inhibitory effect was 38.7 ± 8.3 sec (n=7), which
was significantly longer than the value in the IKATP suppression. When a higher concentration of SKF
(30 µM) was applied, it almost completely abolished the mITRPC (n=4, Fig. 3Ab and 3B). The abolition had a longer time constant (τ), 12.6 ± 5.3
sec (n=3), than the value in IKATP suppression.
Fig. 3.
Effects of SKF96365 (SKF) on carbachol (CCh)-induced mITRPC. Cells bathed in the
Cs+-rich external solution were held under voltage clamp at −60 mV using patch pipettes
filled with the Cs+-rich pipette solution to block any K+ currents. Aa and Ab show a
typical current trace when SKF (10 and 30 µM) was extracellularly applied to the cell in
the presence of CCh (100 µM), respectively. B shows the mean percentages of
IKATP and mITRPC suppressions. Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers
of cells used are presented in parenthesis. * in (B) represents significantly smaller inhibition of
mITRPC induced by SKF (10 µM) relative to the IKATP one
(P<0.05). # in (B) represents significantly greater inhibition of mITRPC
induced by SKF (30 µM) relative to the corresponding one induced by SKF (10
µM) (P<0.05).
Effects of SKF96365 (SKF) on carbachol (CCh)-induced mITRPC. Cells bathed in the
Cs+-rich external solution were held under voltage clamp at −60 mV using patch pipettes
filled with the Cs+-rich pipette solution to block any K+ currents. Aa and Ab show a
typical current trace when SKF (10 and 30 µM) was extracellularly applied to the cell in
the presence of CCh (100 µM), respectively. B shows the mean percentages of
IKATP and mITRPC suppressions. Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers
of cells used are presented in parenthesis. * in (B) represents significantly smaller inhibition of
mITRPC induced by SKF (10 µM) relative to the IKATP one
(P<0.05). # in (B) represents significantly greater inhibition of mITRPC
induced by SKF (30 µM) relative to the corresponding one induced by SKF (10
µM) (P<0.05).SKF reversibly suppressed I: The cells that were bathed in the
Ca2+-free PSS were clamped at a voltage of −80 mV with patch pipettes that were filled with the
K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution. Under these conditions, a 2 sec-step pulse to 20 mV was
repeatedly applied every 20 sec in order to elicit IKv. Applications of the depolarizing pulse evoked
an initial transient outward current (IKVpeak) with an additional sustained component
(IKVsustained), as was previously described in mouse intestinal smooth muscles [25]. As shown in Fig. 4Aa, the amplitudes of both IKVpeak and IKVsustained reduced after the application of
SKF (1 µM). The IKv suppressions developed progressively with time and reached a
plateau about 1–2 min later (Fig. 4Ab). The suppression of the
IKVpeak had a longer time constant (τ) (66.8 ± 23.1 sec, n=8) than the IKVsustained
suppression did (21.1 ± 5.4 sec, n=8), although the difference was not statistically significant. The
mean suppressions of IKVpeak and IKVsustained by SKF (1 µM) were
significantly smaller than IKATP suppression (Fig. 4Ac).
The removal of SKF allowed for a partial recovery of IKVpeak and IKVsustained with a slow
time course (Fig. 4Ab). The restored IKv was strongly
inhibited by the application of the K+ channel blocker TEA (30 mM).
Fig. 4.
Effects of SKF on voltage-gated K+ channel currents (IKv). Cells bathed in the
Ca2+-free PSS were held under voltage clamp at −80 mV using patch pipettes filled with the
K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution. A 2 sec step pulse to 20 mV was repeatedly applied every
20 sec in order to elicit IKv. Aa: IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ)
recorded in a cell when SKF (1 µM) was extracellularly applied. Ab: time courses of the
change in IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ) in the cell in a plotted against time
(the beginning of depolarizing pulse applications was taken as zero) when SKF (1 µM) was
extracellularly applied. Points a-c in the graph correspond with actual IKv records (a–c) in
Aa. Ac shows the mean percentages of IKATP and IKv suppressions induced by SKF (1
µM). Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of cells used are presented in
parenthesis. B (a): time courses of the change in IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ)
when SKF (0.03-30 µM) was cumulatively applied. Bb: the averaged concentration-inhibition
curves of IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ). Each point in Bb indicates the mean ±
S.E.M. of measurements in 3–5 cells. # in (Ac) represents significantly smaller inhibition of
IKv induced by SKF (1 µM) relative to the IKATP one
(P<0.05). Asterisks in (Ac) and (Bb) represent significantly greater inhibition of
the IKVsustained relative to the IKVpeak (P<0.05).
Effects of SKF on voltage-gated K+ channel currents (IKv). Cells bathed in the
Ca2+-free PSS were held under voltage clamp at −80 mV using patch pipettes filled with the
K+-rich high-BAPTA pipette solution. A 2 sec step pulse to 20 mV was repeatedly applied every
20 sec in order to elicit IKv. Aa: IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ)
recorded in a cell when SKF (1 µM) was extracellularly applied. Ab: time courses of the
change in IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ) in the cell in a plotted against time
(the beginning of depolarizing pulse applications was taken as zero) when SKF (1 µM) was
extracellularly applied. Points a-c in the graph correspond with actual IKv records (a–c) in
Aa. Ac shows the mean percentages of IKATP and IKv suppressions induced by SKF (1
µM). Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of cells used are presented in
parenthesis. B (a): time courses of the change in IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ)
when SKF (0.03-30 µM) was cumulatively applied. Bb: the averaged concentration-inhibition
curves of IKVpeak (●) and IKVsustained (Δ). Each point in Bb indicates the mean ±
S.E.M. of measurements in 3–5 cells. # in (Ac) represents significantly smaller inhibition of
IKv induced by SKF (1 µM) relative to the IKATP one
(P<0.05). Asterisks in (Ac) and (Bb) represent significantly greater inhibition of
the IKVsustained relative to the IKVpeak (P<0.05).The cumulative application of SKF (0.03–30 µM) at increasing concentrations inhibited both
IKVpeak and IKVsustained in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effects
reached a maximum at 30 µM (Fig. 4Ba). However, the
IKVsustained suppressions were significantly larger than the IKVpeak suppressions at 3,
10 and 30 µM (Fig. 4Bb). The mean IC50
value that was estimated by the curve fitting of the data from each myocyte was 3.3 ± 0.24 µM
in the IKVpeak (n=5), which was significantly higher than the value in the IKVsustained
(2.0 ± 0.35 µM, n=5). These IC50 values were significantly higher than the value in
the IKATP suppression.I: It is well known that Ca2+ releases from
Ca2+ stores can induce IBK responses [34, 40]. Thus, under the appropriate conditions (see methods), IBK
that was evoked by the potent Ca2+ releaser caffeine was recorded in the presence of SKF. As shown in
Fig. 5A, the STOCs that were evoked by Ca2+ sparks [7] occurred
with various frequencies and amplitudes, as previously reported by Sakamoto et al. [33]. When [Ca2+]i was strongly chelated, the STOCs were
not observed at all (see Figs. 1 and 2). The K+ channel blocker TEA (5 mM) almost abolished the STOCs. In the presence of TEA,
the application of CCh and the subsequent application of caffeine failed to evoke the IBK (data not
shown, n=3). These findings strongly indicated that the STOCs and caffeine-induced IBK were conducted
through BK channels. SKF (1 µM) had no obvious effects on the STOCs (Fig. 5A and 5B). The change rate of the STOC amplitude was similar to the time-dependent
rundown that was observed in the cells without SKF (Fig. 5C). Caffeine
(10 mM) consistently evoked a brief IBK, even in the presence of SKF (1 µM) (Fig. 5B). The mean amplitude of the IBK that was induced by
caffeine did not differ significantly from the value without SKF (Fig.
5D). The higher concentration of SKF (10 µM) reduced the STOCs, but not the
caffeine-induced IBK (Fig. 5C and 5D).
Fig. 5.
Less sensitivity of SKF to Ca2+ activated K+ channel current (IBK).
Cells were bathed in PSS and held at a holding potential of 0 mV using the K+-rich low EGTA
pipette solution. Spontaneous transient or caffeine (10 mM)-induced Ca2+ release events were
detected as IBK. A and B: typical current traces in the absence (A) and presence (B) of SKF (1
µM), respectively. C shows the mean change rates of spontaneous transient outward
IBK (STOCs) in the presence or absence of SKF. D shows summary of caffeine-induced
IBK in the presence or absence of SKF. Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of
cells used are presented in parentheses. * in (C) represents significantly larger reduction in STOCs in
the presence of SKF (10 µM) relative to the time-dependent rundown of STOCs in the
absence of SKF (P<0.05).
Less sensitivity of SKF to Ca2+ activated K+ channel current (IBK).
Cells were bathed in PSS and held at a holding potential of 0 mV using the K+-rich low EGTA
pipette solution. Spontaneous transient or caffeine (10 mM)-induced Ca2+ release events were
detected as IBK. A and B: typical current traces in the absence (A) and presence (B) of SKF (1
µM), respectively. C shows the mean change rates of spontaneous transient outward
IBK (STOCs) in the presence or absence of SKF. D shows summary of caffeine-induced
IBK in the presence or absence of SKF. Each column indicates mean + 1 S.E.M. The numbers of
cells used are presented in parentheses. * in (C) represents significantly larger reduction in STOCs in
the presence of SKF (10 µM) relative to the time-dependent rundown of STOCs in the
absence of SKF (P<0.05).
DISCUSSION
Activation of the muscarinic receptors induces the opening of cationic channels comprising TRPC4 and 6 [43]. SKF has been used as an inhibitor of the TRPC channels [9, 26, 52]. However, it has been reported to inhibit other types of ion channels, including CaV1,
CaV2, CaV3 [27, 37], NaV1 [13] and inwardly or outwardly rectifying
K+ channels [36]. In this study, we investigated the effects
of SKF on the activities of the KATP, KV and BK channels that are expressed in
gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells.KATP channels have been suggested to regulate electrical excitability in gastrointestinal smooth
muscles [19,20,21]. Cromakalim induced a sustained inward current that was abolished by
glibenclamide in small intestinal smooth muscles of the mouse, as has been reported by Nuttle & Farley
[31]. The I-V curve of the cromakalim-induced current was almost
linear, which was consistent with the results obtained for rabbit esophageal [12] and swine tracheal [31] smooth muscle cells. The reversal
potential of the current was similar to the estimated EK value, and the replacement of extracellular
K+ with Cs+ abolished the current, which indicated that the charge carrier of this
current was K+. These results indicated that the cromakalim-induced current was carried through the
KATP channels. The extracellular application of SKF reversibly inhibited the cromakalim-induced
IKATP in a concentration-dependent manner. The IKATP was abolished at a SKF
concentration of 10 µM. Although SKF (10 µM) also inhibited the CCh-induced
mITRPC, the mean percentage of suppression was only about 50% in the present study, which was
consistent with the IC50 (6.5–14.5 µM) that has been reported for SKF-induced
mITRPC suppression [52]. The mean IC50 value
(0.85 µM) for the SKF-induced IKATP suppression in the present study was obviously
lower than the reported IC50 value for the mITRPC suppression, which suggested that SKF
suppressed the KATP channels with a higher affinity than that required for inhibition of TRPC
channels.The KATP channels are composed of Kir6 and SUR subunits. Two Kir6 genes (Kir6.1 and Kir6.2) and two
SUR genes (SUR1 and SUR2) have been identified [1]. The pharmacological
properties of the KATP channels, including the sensitivity to its channel opener and blocker, depend
on the channel subunits [16, 17,
49]. KATP channels, which have been reported in pancreatic β
cells, cardiac muscles and vascular smooth muscles, consist of the Kir6.2/SUR1 [10, 28], Kir6.2/SUR2A [4]
and Kir6.1/SUR2B [29, 39, 49] subunits, respectively. Nakayama et al. [30] have reported the expression of Kir6.1 and SUR2B in mouse ileal smooth
muscles. Quayle et al. [32] have reported that the
IC50 values of glibenclamide, tolbutamide, which is a selective KATP channel inhibitor,
and TEA, which is a nonselective K+ channel blocker, were 101 nM, 351 µM and 6.2 mM,
respectively, in the smooth muscles from the rabbit mesenteric artery. Taken together with our results, the
order of affinity to the KATP channels appears to be glibenclamide >SKF >> tolbutamide
>> TEA. Future investigations are needed on the sensitivity of SKF to other types of KATP
channelsBecause the I-V curve of the IKATP that was obtained from the myocytes in the presence of SKF
remained linear, the inhibitory effects of SKF on IKATP seemed to be voltage-independent.
Glibenclamide inhibits the KATP by occupying sulfonylurea receptors [8]. The IKATP abolition that was induced by glibenclamide developed more slowly than that
induced by SKF, as shown by the time constants of the abolitions. Thus, SKF may inhibit the KATP in a
different manner from that of glibenclamide. The short time course of the SKF-induced IKATP
suppression implies the involvement of a simple mechanism, such as direct blockade of the channel pore, which is
located in Kir6, as was suggested in caffeine-induced IKATP suppression [41]. If so, the binding site might not be a voltage sensor of the channels, and its binding
would be reversible. Future investigations with the single channel patch clamp technique are needed to elucidate
the blockade mechanisms of SKF.Zholos et al. [52] have reported that the inhibition of
mITRPC by SKF was greater at positive membrane potentials than that at negative ones, which
indicated the voltage-dependency of its inhibitory effects. Thus, the mechanisms of SKF-induced suppression of
the mITRPC may be somewhat different from those for the IKATP. This idea is supported by
the fact that the time constant of the SKF-induced mITRPC suppression was much longer than the
corresponding value of IKATP suppression. The different characteristics of these suppressions can
provide useful information when SKF is used as a blocker of TRPC or KATP.KV channels, which are widely expressed in gastrointestinal smooth muscles, are involved in the
setting of the resting membrane potential and the determination of amplitude and rhythmicity of action
potentials [22, 48]. Application
of the depolarizing pulse evoked a biphasic outward current that consisted of IKVpeak and
IKVsustained and that was strongly inhibited by TEA. SKF (1 µM), which was a
concentration that corresponded to the IC50 in the IKATP suppression, reversibly inhibited
the IKv. However, the mean percentages of the SKF-induced IKv suppressions were only ~30%,
and the IC50 values (>2 µM), which were significantly higher than the value in
the IKATP suppression, were similar to the value reported for mITRPC suppression. A great
contribution of the KV4 and KV2 family to the IKVpeak and
IKVsustained, respectively, has been suggested [3, 25, 35]. The heterogeneity of
IKv can make it difficult to determine the sensitivity of the KV family to SKF due to
the lack of commercial blockers with high selectivity. However, the IKVsustained suppression was
greater than the IKVpeak suppression with a lower IC50 value (IKVsustained: 2.2
µM vs. IKVpeak: 3.3 µM). Furthermore, the time constant of the
IKVsustained suppression was shorter than the value for the IKVpeak
suppression. These findings may reflect decreased sensitivity of the KV4 family for SKF
compared with KV2. The short time course of the SKF-induced IKVsustained suppression may
imply a direct bind of SKF to the channel, as indicated in TEA or 4-Aminopyridine-induced KV channel
suppressions [38, 42] as well as
the IKATP suppression.In gastrointestinal smooth muscles, BK channels are expressed and supposed to involve in a negative feedback
mechanism to prevent cytosolic Ca2+ overload induced by the muscarinic Ca2+ mobilization
[46]. SKF (1 µM) had no significant effects on STOCs
and caffeine-induced IBK which reflected the Ca2+ release from the internal stores in the
myocytes. These results indicated that BK channel is less sensitive to SKF. Taken together, SKF can inhibit
KATP, KV and BK channels in addition to TRPC channel, and the order of affinity of SKF
to those channels appears to be KATP >KV ≈ TRPCs >BK. SKF (3–50 µM)
has been reported to evoke membrane depolarization in gastrointestinal muscles (15, 51). The depolarization can
be explained by the inhibitory effects of SKF on those K+ channels. The depolarization can cause to
underestimate a contribution of TRPC channel to mechanical and electrical responses. Thus, the inhibitory
effects of those K+ channels should be considered when SKF is used as a TRPC channel blocker in
gastrointestinal smooth muscles. Characterizing the SKF-induced suppression, such as IC50 and
voltage-dependency, and additional tests with other TRPC blockers may be necessary to assess an involvement of
TRPC channel in a response.In conclusion, SKF can suppress KATP, KV and BK channels. The order of affinity of SKF to
those channels is KATP > KV > BK.
Authors: Gregory C Amberg; Sang Don Koh; William J Hatton; Keith J Murray; Kevin Monaghan; Burton Horowitz; Kenton M Sanders Journal: J Physiol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: J Y Jun; I D Kong; S D Koh; X Y Wang; B A Perrino; S M Ward; K M Sanders Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; William A Catterall; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Ingrid M Bonilla; Andriy E Belevych; Stephen Baine; Andrei Stepanov; Louisa Mezache; Tom Bodnar; Bin Liu; Pompeo Volpe; Silvia Priori; Noah Weisleder; Galina Sakuta; Cynthia A Carnes; Przemysław B Radwański; Rengasayee Veeraraghavan; Sandor Gyorke Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Cora S Thiel; Svantje Tauber; Swantje Christoffel; Andreas Huge; Beatrice A Lauber; Jennifer Polzer; Katrin Paulsen; Hartwin Lier; Frank Engelmann; Burkhard Schmitz; Andreas Schütte; Christiane Raig; Liliana E Layer; Oliver Ullrich Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.379