| Literature DB >> 26498636 |
A S Donin1, J E Dent1, C M Nightingale1, N Sattar2, C G Owen1, A R Rudnicka1, M R Perkin1, A M Stephen3,4, S A Jebb5, D G Cook1, P H Whincup1.
Abstract
AIM: To examine whether low circulating vitamin C concentrations and low fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with insulin resistance and other Type 2 diabetes risk markers in childhood.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26498636 PMCID: PMC4832256 DOI: 10.1111/dme.13006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabet Med ISSN: 0742-3071 Impact factor: 4.359
Demographic data, Type 2 diabetes risk markers, dietary fruit, vegetable and vitamin C intakes and plasma vitamin C, stratified by ethnic group
| White Europeans ( | Black Caribbeans ( | Black Africans ( | Indians ( | Pakistanis ( | Bangladeshis ( | Other ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | ||
| Age, years | 10.0 (0.4) | 9.9 (0.4) | 9.9 (0.4) | 10.0 (0.4) | 10.0 (0.3) | 10.0 (0.4) | 10.0 (0.4) | 0.87 |
| Insulin | 6.0 (4.2) | 7.5 (5.2) | 7.0 (5.8) | 8.4 (6.7) | 7.6 (5.9) | 9.1 (7.0) | 6.9 (5.6) | < 0.0001 |
| Insulin resistance | 0.7 (0.6) | 0.9 (0.8) | 0.9 (0.7) | 1.0 (0.8) | 1.0 (0.8) | 1.1 (0.9) | 0.9 (0.7) | < 0.0001 |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol | 33 | 34 | 34 | 36 | 34 | 34 | < 0.0001 | |
| HbA1c
| 5.2 (0.3) | 5.3 (0.5) | 5.3 (0.4) | 5.4 (0.4) | 5.3 (0.4) | 5.3 (0.4) | 5.2 (0.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Glucose | 4.5 (0.5) | 4.4 (0.4) | 4.4 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.5) | 4.6 (0.4) | 4.5 (0.5) | 0.01 |
| Triglyceride | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.8 (0.4) | 0.7 (0.3) | 1.0 (0.5) | 0.9 (0.4) | 1.0 (0.6) | 0.8 (0.5) | < 0.0001 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/l | 1.6 (0.3) | 1.6 (0.3) | 1.6 (0.3) | 1.5 (0.4) | 1.5 (0.3) | 1.4 (0.3) | 1.5 (0.4) | 0.003 |
| C‐reactive protein | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.5 (1.3) | 0.5 (1.0) | 0.6 (1.3) | 0.8 (1.4) | 0.5 (0.9) | 0.5 (1.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Urate | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | 0.2 (0.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 104.5 (10.5) | 104.8 (11.2) | 103.5 (10.6) | 104.2 (11.4) | 103.8 (10.6) | 103.5 (11.7) | 105.2 (10.6) | 0.62 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 62.2 (8.7) | 62.9 (9.5 | 63.0 (9.6) | 64.0 (10.0) | 62.8 (9.2) | 62.9 (9.8) | 62.6 (9.7) | < 0.0001 |
| Fat mass index | 2.1 (1.1) | 1.9 (1.2) | 1.9 (1.0) | 2.1 (1.3) | 2.1 (1.1) | 2.2 (1.1) | 2.1 (1.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Dietary vitamin C | 87.2 (95.3) | 82.3 (78.3) | 86.9 (104.8) | 88.2 (95.9) | 77.9 (89.1) | 66.7 (83.8) | 81.5 (97.8) | 0.26 |
| Fruit intake | 136.9 (120.0) | 121.0 (100.0) | 140.2 (105.0) | 124.5 (120.0) | 125.4 (100.0) | 126.2 (100.0) | 121.8 (104.0) | 0.29 |
| Vegetable intake | 70.4 (78.8) | 77.6 (105.0) | 89.9 (93.0) | 77.3 (117.5) | 78.0 (69.8) | 76.7 (103.2) | 76.2 (80.5) | < 0.0001 |
| Plasma vitamin C, μmol/l | 89.1 (23.3) | 86.8 (19.8) | 82.8 (22.5) | 80.8 (23.4) | 78.1 (23.3) | 65.8 (24.6) | 85.5 (21.4) | < 0.0001 |
| Energy intake, kcals | 1,813 (484) | 1,815 (484) | 1,839 (520) | 1,864 (476) | 1,952 (528) | 1,954 (556) | 1,814 (460) | 0.019 |
| Cotinine, ng/ml | 1.1 (2.0) | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.4 (1.8) | 0.4 (0.8) | 1.4 (10.5) | 0.8 (1.6) | 0.002 |
| Physical activity, counts p/min | 493.8 (102.6) | 494.7 (105.3) | 485.5 (103.5) | 427.2 (116.2) | 468.4 (109.5) | 448.3 (105.0) | 506.2 (104.7) | < 0.0001 |
| Sex, % girls | 51 | 46 | 59 | 47 | 53 | 58 | 49 | 0.11 |
| Vitamin supplement users, % | 19 | 24 | 10 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 23 | < 0.0001 |
| Parental socio‐economic status, | 32 | 36 | 27 | 28 | 16 | 11 | 29 | < 0.0001 |
| % managerial/professional |
BP, blood pressure; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; IQR, interquartile range.
†Geometric means and IQRs are given for log‐transformed variables. Means and geometric means, sd and IQR are based on raw data. P values are adjusted for age, sex, month school as a random effect.
‡P values for frequencies are derived from chi‐squared tests.
Percentage differences in Type 2 diabetes risk markers per one interquartile range increase in dietary fruit, vegetables and vitamin C intakes and plasma vitamin C concentrations in 2025 children
| Outcome | All fruit (g) | All vegetables (g) | Dietary vitamin C (mg) | Plasma vitamin C (μmol/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % difference (95% CI) |
| % difference (95% CI) |
| % difference (95% CI) |
| % difference (95% CI) |
| |
| Insulin (mU/l) | 0.7 (−3.2, 4.8) | 0.73 | 0.8 (−2.7, 4.4) | 0.65 | 1.0 (−2.3, 4.4) | 0.54 | −11.5 (−14.7, −8.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Insulin resistance (HOMA) | 0.7 (−3.2, 4.7) | 0.73 | 1.0 (−2.5, 4.6) | 0.58 | 0.9 (−2.4, 4.3) | 0.59 | −11.7 (−14.9, −8.3) | < 0.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6) | 0.40 | 0.2 (−0.1, 0.6) | 0.19 | 0.2 (−0.1, 0.5) | 0.24 | 0.5 (0.1, 0.9) | 0.01 |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | −0.1 (−0.6, 0.3) | 0.59 | 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6) | 0.33 | −0.1 (−0.5, 0.3) | 0.51 | −0.8 (−1.2, −0.4) | 0.0002 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/l) | 0.5 (−1.9, 3.0) | 0.67 | −2.0 (−4.1, 0.1) | 0.07 | 1.1 (−1.0, 3.2) | 0.30 | −0.2 (−2.5, 2.1) | 0.84 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | −0.1 (−1.4, 1.3) | 0.92 | 0.5 (−0.7, 1.7) | 0.38 | 1.0 (−0.1, 2.2) | 0.08 | 2.9 (1.6, 4.2) | < 0.0001 |
| C‐reactive protein (mg/l) | −1.3 (−9.2, 7.2) | 0.75 | −1.6 (−8.7, 6.0) | 0.66 | 4.4 (−2.6, 11.9) | 0.23 | −7.8 (−14.7, −0.3) | 0.04 |
| Urate (mmol/l) | 1.2 (−0.3, 2.8) | 0.12 | 0.1 (−1.3, 1.5) | 0.92 | −0.3 (−1.6, 1.0) | 0.66 | −4.9 (−6.3, −3.5) | < 0.0001 |
| Fat mass index | 0.0 (−2.3, 2.3) | 0.98 | −1.8 (−3.8, 0.2) | 0.08 | 0.7 (−1.2, 2.7) | 0.47 | −2.1 (−4.3, 0.0) | 0.05 |
HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; IQR, interquartile range.
Percentage differences are adjusted for age (quartiles), sex, month, total energy intake (kcals), ethnic group and school (random effect). A one IQR increase represents 170 g/day for fruit intake, 100 g/day for vegetable intake, 95.3 mg/day for vitamin C intake and 30.9 μmol/l for plasma vitamin C concentration.
Percentage differences in Type 2 diabetes risk markers per one interquartile range increase in circulating plasma vitamin C concentrations: effect of adjustment for potential confounders
| Outcome | Model | Difference per 1 IQR increase in plasma vitamin C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % difference (95% CI) |
| ||
| Insulin (mU/L) | Model 1 | −11.5 (−14.7, −8.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | −9.6 (−12.6, −6.5) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 3 | −9.5 (−12.5, −6.4) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 4 | −7.7 (−11.1, −4.2) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 5 | −7.2 (−10.6, −3.8) | < 0.0001 | |
| Insulin resistance (HOMA) | Model 1 | −11.7 (−14.9, −8.3) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | −9.8 (−12.8, −6.7) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 3 | −9.7 (−12.7, −6.6) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 4 | −7.8 (−11.2, −4.3) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 5 | −7.4 (−10.7, −4.0) | < 0.0001 | |
| HbA1c (%) | Model 1 | 0.5 (0.1, 0.9) | 0.01 |
| Model 2 | 0.6 (0.2, 1.0) | 0.002 | |
| Model 3 | 0.6 (0.2, 1.0) | 0.003 | |
| Model 4 | 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) | 0.002 | |
| Model 5 | 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) | 0.001 | |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | Model 1 | −0.8 (−1.2, −0.4) | 0.0002 |
| Model 2 | −0.8 (−1.2, −0.4) | 0.0004 | |
| Model 3 | −0.8 (−1.2, −0.4) | 0.0003 | |
| Model 4 | −0.6 (−1.1, −0.2) | 0.01 | |
| Model 5 | −0.6 (−1.1, −0.1) | 0.01 | |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | Model 1 | 2.9 (1.6, 4.2) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | 2.4 (1.1, 3.6) | 0.0002 | |
| Model 3 | 2.2 (0.9, 3.4) | 0.0005 | |
| Model 4 | 2.0 (0.6, 3.4) | 0.004 | |
| Model 5 | 2.0 (0.6, 3.4) | 0.004 | |
| Urate (mmol/l) | Model 1 | −4.9 (−6.3, −3.5) | < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | −4.4 (−5.7, −3.0) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 3 | −4.4 (−5.7, −3.1) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 4 | −4.2 (−5.7, −2.7) | < 0.0001 | |
| Model 5 | −4.2 (−5.7, −2.6) | < 0.0001 | |
HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; IQR, interquartile range.
Model 1: Percentage differences are adjusted for age (quartiles), sex, month, total energy intake, ethnic group and school (random effect).
Model 2: Adjusted as for model 1 plus adiposity (fat mass index).
Model 3: Adjusted as for model 2 plus socio‐economic status.
Model 4: Adjusted as for model 3 plus physical activity.
Model 5: Adjusted as for model 4 plus blood pressure.
Model 1, 2 and 3 includes 2025 children; model 4 and 5 includes 1539 children (486 children did not provide physical activity data). One IQR increase represents 30.9 μmol/l in plasma vitamin C concentrations.
Ethnic differences in insulin and insulin resistance (ethnic groups minus white Europeans): effect of additional adjustments for dietary and plasma vitamin C
| Outcome | Adjustments | Black Caribbean differences ( | Black African differences ( | Indian differences ( | Pakistani differences ( | Bangladeshi differences ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % difference (95% CI) | % difference (95% CI) | % difference (95% CI) | % difference (95% CI) | % difference (95% CI) | ||
| Insulin (mU/L) | Standard | 29.3 (17.8, 41.9) | 22.2 (12.7, 32.5) | 39.0 (24.3, 55.5) | 20.5 (9.3, 32.9) | 40.8 (26.6, 56.5) |
| + dietary vitamin C | 29.3 (17.8, 41.9) | 22.2 (12.7, 32.5) | 39.1 (24.3, 55.5) | 20.6 (9.4, 33.0) | 41.0 (26.8, 56.8) | |
| + fruit intake | 29.3 (17.8, 41.9) | 22.2 (12.6, 32.5) | 39.0 (24.2, 55.5) | 20.5 (9.3, 32.9) | 40.8 (26.6, 56.7) | |
| + vegetable intake | 28.8 (17.4, 41.4) | 21.3 (11.8, 31.6) | 37.8 (23.1, 54.2) | 19.9 (8.7, 32.3) | 39.7 (25.5, 55.5) | |
| + plasma vitamin C | 27.7 (16.4, 40.0) | 19.1 (9.9, 29.1) | 34.9 (20.7, 50.8) | 16.2 (5.4, 28.1) | 31.4 (18.0, 46.3) | |
| Insulin resistance (HOMA) | Standard | 29.7 (18.2, 42.3) | 21.9 (12.5, 32.2) | 39.0 (24.3, 55.5) | 21.0 (9.7, 33.3) | 40.8 (26.7, 56.5) |
| + dietary vitamin C | 29.7 (18.2, 42.3) | 21.9 (12.5, 32.2) | 39.1 (24.4, 55.6) | 21.1 (9.8, 33.5) | 41.0 (26.8, 56.7) | |
| + fruit intake | 29.7 (18.2, 42.4) | 21.9 (12.4, 32.2) | 39.0 (24.3, 55.5) | 21.0 (9.7, 33.4) | 40.9 (26.7, 56.7) | |
| + vegetable intake | 29.2 (17.7, 41.8) | 21.0 (11.6, 31.3) | 37.7 (23.1, 54.1) | 20.3 (9.1, 32.7) | 39.7 (25.6, 55.4) | |
| + plasma vitamin C | 28.0 (16.8, 40.4) | 18.8 (9.6, 28.8) | 34.9 (20.7, 50.8) | 16.5 (5.7, 28.5) | 31.1 (17.8, 46.0) |
HOMA, homeostatic model assessment.
†Standard adjustments are made for age (quartiles), sex, month, adiposity (fat mass index), total energy intake and school (random effect) in all models; each nutritional factor was added separately in analysis. % reduction in coefficient.
** Significantly different from white Europeans at P < 0.001, *** significantly different from white Europeans at P < 0.0001.