| Literature DB >> 26498278 |
Ying-Hui Zhu1, Baozhu Zhang2, Mengqing Li3, Pinzhu Huang4, Jian Sun5, Jianhua Fu6,7,8, Xin-Yuan Guan9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family with sequence similarity 3, member C (FAM3C) has been identified as a novel regulator in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastatic progression. However, the role of FAM3C in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unexplored. The purpose of present study is to illustrate the role of FAM3C in predicting outcomes of patients with ESCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26498278 PMCID: PMC4619363 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-015-0424-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Fig. 1Upregulation of FAM3C in ESCC. a FAM3C mRNA expression in ESCC and matched adjacent nontumor specimens from 40 cases of ESCC patients. The dot plots represent the FAM3C expression in tumor and nontumor samples from 40 ESCCs. **, P < 0.001, paired t-test. b Western blot analysis of FAM3C expression levels in 12 paired ESCC and nontumor specimens. GAPDH was used as a loading control. N, nontumor tissue; T, tumor tissue. c Analysis showing linear regressions and significant Pearson correlations of FAM3C with E-cadherin and FAM3C with vimentin in 40 ESCC samples
Association of FAM3C expression with clinicopathological features in ESCC
| Clinical features | Cases |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| low level (%) | high level (%) | |||
| Age (years old) | 0.204 | |||
| ≤59 | 49 | 28 (57.1 %) | 21 (42.9 %) | |
| >59 | 58 | 26 (44.8 %) | 32 (55.2 %) | |
| Gender | 0.954 | |||
| Male | 79 | 40 (50.6 %) | 39 (49.4 %) | |
| Female | 28 | 14 (50.0 %) | 14 (50.0 %) | |
| Location | 0.811 | |||
| Upper | 12 | 5 (41.7 %) | 7 (58.3 %) | |
| Middle | 60 | 31 (51.7 %) | 29 (48.3 %) | |
| Lower | 35 | 18 (51.4 %) | 17 (48.6 %) | |
| Differentiation | 0.843 | |||
| Grade 1 | 20 | 9 (45.0 %) | 11 (55.0 %) | |
| Grade 2 | 57 | 29 (50.9 %) | 28 (49.1 %) | |
| Grade 3 | 30 | 16 (53.3 %) | 14 (46.7 %) | |
| pT stage |
| |||
| T1-2 | 25 | 18 (72.0 %) | 7 (28.0 %) | |
| T3-4 | 82 | 36 (43.9 %) | 46 (56.1 %) | |
| pN stage |
| |||
| N0 | 56 | 34 (60.7 %) | 22 (39.3 %) | |
| N1-3 | 51 | 20 (39.2 %) | 31 (60.8 %) | |
| TNM stage |
| |||
| I-II | 60 | 38 (63.3 %) | 22 (36.7 %) | |
| III | 47 | 16 (34.0 %) | 31 (66.0 %) | |
Statistical significance (P < 0.05) is shown in bold
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS for FAM3C expression. a Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS for FAM3C expression in 107 cases of ESCC patients. b Stratified survival analysis according to the TNM stage
Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for overall survival
| Clinical features | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95 % CI) |
| HR (95 % CI) |
| |
| Age | 1.321 (0.747–2.337) | 0.338 | – | – |
| Gender | 0.613 (0.297–1.265) | 0.186 | – | – |
| Location | 1.012 (0.647–1.583) | 0.958 | – |
|
| Differentiation | 1.574 (1.014–2.443) |
| 1.659 (1.016–2.708) |
|
| pT stage | 5.922 (1.838–19.089) |
| 3.463 (1.029–11.661) |
|
| pN stage | 5.470 (2.864–10.447) | < | 3.789 (1.937–7.409) | < |
|
| 2.941 (1.606–5.389) | < | 2.067 (1.109–3.854) |
|
HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval
Statistical significance (P < 0.05) is shown in bold