| Literature DB >> 26498197 |
Yandong Ban1, Ju Qiu2, Changzhong Ren3, Zaigui Li4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of present study is to investigate the influences of brewing and boiling on hypocholesterolemic effect of oatmeal in rats fed with a hypercholesterolemic diet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26498197 PMCID: PMC4619352 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-015-0138-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Diet composition (g/1000 g diet)
| C | Br1 | Bo1 | Br8 | Bo8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casein | 200 | 187.1 | 187.1 | 183.3 | 183.3 |
| Corn Starch | 397 | 321.1 | 321.1 | 328.2 | 328.2 |
| Soybean oil | 70 | 64.4 | 64.4 | 64.5 | 64.5 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 44.4 | 44.4 | 41.0 | 41.0 |
| Oatmeal | |||||
| Brewed Bayou No.1 | 100 | ||||
| Boiled Bayou No.1 | 100 | ||||
| Brewed Bayou No.8 | 100 | ||||
| Boiled Bayou No.8 | 100 | ||||
| Maltodextrin 10 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 | 132 |
| Sucrose | 38.486 | 38.486 | 38.486 | 38.486 | 38.486 |
| t-Butylhydroquinone | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Mineral Mix | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Vitamin Mix | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Choline Bitartrate | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| L-Cystine | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Cholesterol | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Bile salt | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Lard | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
The diets were prepared according to the AIN-93G formula with some modifications as described in the section of Materials and methods. Control, C; Brewed Bayou No.1, Br1; Boiled Bayou No.1, Bo1; Brewed Bayou No.8, Br8; Boiled Bayou No.8, Bo8
Effects of eating methods on the growth parameters of Sprague–Dawley rats fed with a hypercholesterolemic dieta
| C | Br1 | Bo1 | Br8 | Bo8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intake (g/day) | |||||
| Food | 25.1 ± 0.4 | 25.2 ± 0.5 | 25.3 ± 0.4 | 25.0 ± 0.3 | 25.4 ± 0.3 |
| Water | 19.8 ± 0.4 | 18.9 ± 0.5 | 19.0 ± 0.5 | 19.0 ± 0.5 | 19.8 ± 0.4 |
| Weight (g) | |||||
| Initial body weight | 281 ± 5 | 279 ± 6 | 277 ± 4 | 283 ± 5 | 279 ± 7 |
| Final body weight | 327 ± 9 | 333 ± 10 | 332 ± 9 | 323 ± 13 | 323 ± 10 |
| Body weight gain | 56 ± 9 | 54 ± 8 | 55 ± 5 | 50 ± 7 | 54 ± 8 |
| Liver | 10.7 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.8 | 11.0 ± 0.6 | 10.9 ± 0.5 | 11.3 ± 0.2 |
aMeans and standard errors (SE) were determined from 8 rats per group. Control, C; Brewed Bayou No.1, Br1; Boiled Bayou No.1, Bo1; Brewed Bayou No.8, Br8; Boiled Bayou No.8, Bo8
Fig. 1Plasma total cholesterol (a), LDL-cholesterol (b), HDL-cholesterol (c), and triglycerides (d) of the experimental rats. Means and standard errors were determined from 8 rats per group. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Liver total cholesterol (a), free cholesterol (b), cholesterol ester (c), and triglycerides (d) of the experimental rats. Means and standard errors were determined from 9 rats per group. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05
Fig. 3Liver structure of the experimental rats (H&E stain; 200×)
Effects of eating methods on the fecal parameters of Sprague–Dawley rats fed with a hypercholesterolemic diet1
| C | Br1 | Bo1 | Br8 | Bo8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal weight (g/day) | 2.50 ± 0.21 | 2.55 ± 0.23 | 2.61 ± 0.17 | 2.58 ± 0.19 | 2.66 ± 0.11 |
| Fecal lipids (mg/day) | |||||
| Total lipids | 91 ± 9a | 132 ± 11b | 197 ± 10c | 136 ± 8b | 241 ± 22d |
| Cholesterol | 44 ± 5a | 59 ± 6b | 90 ± 8c | 64 ± 7b | 117 ± 13d |
| Bile acids | 57 ± 3a | 67 ± 5b | 93 ± 4c | 89 ± 5c | 121 ± 11d |
1Means and standard errors (SE) were determined from 8 rats per group. Different superscript letters indicated significant differences at P < 0.05 (Tukey-Kramer’s multiple comparison post hoc test). Control, C; Brewed Bayou No.1, Br1; Boiled Bayou No.1, Bo1; Brewed Bayou No.8, Br8; Boiled Bayou No.8, Bo8
Fig. 4Apparent viscosity (a), soluble β-glucan (b), starch gelatinization (c), and protein dispersibility index (d) of the brewed oatmeal and boiled oatmeal. Means and standard errors were determined in triplicate for each sample. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05