| Literature DB >> 26497849 |
Han Zhang1,2,3, Ze-Lei Li1,2,3, Shu-Biao Ye1,2,3, Li-Ying Ouyang1,2,4, Yu-Shan Chen1,2,5, Jia He1,2,3, Hui-Qiang Huang1,2,6, Yi-Xin Zeng1,2, Xiao-Shi Zhang7,8,9, Jiang Li10,11,12.
Abstract
The expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and its correlation with advanced disease stage have been shown in solid cancers. Here, we investigated the functional features and clinical significance of MDSCs in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKL). A higher percentage of circulating HLA-DR(-)CD33(+)CD11b(+) MDSCs was observed in ENKL patients than in healthy controls (P < 0.05, n = 32) by flow cytometry analysis. These MDSCs from ENKL patients (ENKL-MDSCs) consisted of CD14(+) monocytic (Mo-MDSCs, >60 %) and CD15(+) granulocytic (PMN-MDSCs, <20 %) MDSCs. Furthermore, these ENKL-MDSCs expressed higher levels of Arg-1, iNOS and IL-17 compared to the levels of MDSCs from healthy donors, and they expressed moderate levels of TGFβ and IL-10 but lower levels of CD66b. The ENKL-MDSCs strongly suppressed the anti-CD3-induced allogeneic and autologous CD4 T cell proliferation (P < 0.05), but they only slightly suppressed CD8 T cell proliferation (P > 0.05). Interestingly, ENKL-MDSCs inhibited the secretion of IFNγ but promoted IL-10, IL-17 and TGFβ secretion as well as Foxp3 expression in T cells. The administration of inhibitors of iNOS, Arg-1 and ROS significantly reversed the suppression of anti-CD3-induced T cell proliferation by MDSCs (P < 0.05). Importantly, based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, the HLA-DR(-)CD33(+)CD11b(+) cells and CD14(+) Mo-MDSCs were independent predictors for disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.013 and 0.016) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.017 and 0.027). Overall, our results identified for the first time that ENKL-MDSCs (mainly Mo-MDSCs) have a prognostic value for patients and a suppressive function on T cell proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: Hematopoietic malignancy; Immunosuppression; MDSCs; NK/T cell lymphoma; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26497849 PMCID: PMC4643115 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-015-1765-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Fig. 1Expansion of MDSCs in patients with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma. a Gating routine for MDSC subsets. b–c The dot plots represent the CD33+CD11b+ cell subset, the CD33+CD11b− cell subset and the CD33−CD11b+ cell subset gating on the HLA-DR− fraction among the PBMCs from healthy donors (b) or ENKL patients (c). d–f The statistical analysis of the percentage of the MDSC subsets among the PBMCs from the ENKL patients (n = 32) and healthy donors (n = 32). The error bar represents the SEM. Student’s t test is used. HD healthy donor, ENKL extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma
Fig. 2Phenotypes and cytokine profiles of HLA-DR−CD33+CD11b+ MDSCs in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma patients. The HLA-DR−CD33+CD11b+ cells are gated as MDSCs from 22 NK/T cell lymphoma patients. The properties of the MDSCs are analyzed via flow cytometry using multiple antihuman mAbs against CD14, CD15, CD66b, iNOS, Arg-1, IL-17, IL-10 and TGFβ. a Representative FACS plots of the CD14+ or CD15+ MDSCs from the same ENKL patients. b Graph of the CD14+ Mo-MDSCs and CD15+ PNM-MDSCs among the PBMCs from 22 ENKL patients and 22 healthy controls. c Representative FACS histogram for CD66b, iNOS and Arg-1 expression in ENKL-MDSCs and MDSCs from healthy control. d The data shown are the MFI of CD66b, iNOS and Arg-1 in ENKL-MDSCs from 22 ENKL patients and MDSCs from healthy controls determined by cytofluorimetric analysis and are corrected for background staining. e The percentage of cytokine-producing ENKL-MDSCs from 22 ENKL patients and MDSCs from healthy controls, including IL-17, IL-10 and TGFβ. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05
Fig. 3ENKL-MDSCs suppress allogeneic and autologous T cell proliferation. T cell proliferation is examined by CSFE labeling in vitro. The CD33+ cells are sorted from the PBMCs from five patients with ENKL, and CD33+ cells from healthy donors are included as a control. The CSFE-labeled PBMCs are co-cultured with the CD33+ cells at a ratio of 2:1 in OKT3-coated 96-well plates. After 3 days, the cells are collected and quantified using flow cytometry. a, c Allogeneic and autologous OKT3-stimulated PBMCs. Representative FACS density plots from one of the five experiments. b, d The graph of the statistical analyses is presented. The error bars represent the SEM. n = 5; *P < 0.05; HD healthy donors
Fig. 4Multiplex mechanisms are involved in the ENKL-MDSC-mediated suppression of T cell proliferation. l-NMMA, NOHA or NAC is added to a portion of the samples in the co-culture system of CSFE-labeled PBMCs and ENKL-MDSCs at ratio 2:1 in OKT3-coated 96-well plates. After 3 days, the cells are collected and quantified using flow cytometry. a, b Allogeneic and autologous OKT3-stimulated PBMCs. c Cytokine secretion (IFNγ, IL-17, IL-10 and TGFβ) and Foxp3 expression in CD4 or CD8 T cells in the presence of allogeneic ENKL-MDSCs, autologous ENKL-MDSCs or only in medium. l-NMMA, NG-methyl-l-arginine; NOHA, N-hydroxy-nor-l-arginine; NAC, N-acetylcysteine; Student’s t test is used
Fig. 5Correlation of circulating MDSCs or Mo-MDSCs with survival in extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma cases. a The overall survival (OS) curve of 32 ENKL patients. b, c The DFS and OS rates are significantly different between the high and low HLA-DR−CD33+CD11b+ cell counts (P = 0.007 and 0.014, respectively, log-rank test). d, e The DFS and OS rates are significantly different between the high and low CD14+ Mo-MDSC counts (P = 0.011 and 0.028, respectively, log-rank test). The cutoff value is the median of the HLA-DR−CD33+CD11b+ cell or CD14+ Mo-MDSC density
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for DFS and OS of 32 patients with ENKL
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95 % CI) |
| HR (95 % CI) |
| |
| In MDSC population | ||||
| Disease-free survival | ||||
| Age (<40/≥40) | 1.259 (0.355–4.470) | 0.722 | ||
| Gender (female/male) | 1.930 (0.544–6.852) | 0.309 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage (I/II–IV) | 3.434 (0.959–12.293) | 0.045* | 1.748 (0.368–8.295) | 0.482 |
| Subtypes (UNKTL/EUNKTL) | 1.306 (0.277–6.164) | 0.736 | ||
| B symptoms (no/yes) | 55.563 (0.323–9550.869) | 0.126 | ||
| LDH level (normal/elevated) | 3.834 (1.091–13.474) | 0.036* | 0.875 (0.070–10.912) | 0.918 |
| KPI score (0–1/2–4) | 3.417 (0.881–13.250) | 0.076 | ||
| PIT score (0–1/2–4) | 3.031 (0.852–10.785) | 0.084 | ||
| IPI score (0–1/2–5) | 3.718 (1.074–12.874) | 0.038* | 5.327 (0.324–87.663) | 0.242 |
| MDSC frequency (low/high)a | 10.216 (1.285–81.244) | 0.028* | 21.633 (1.892–247.378) | 0.013* |
| Overall survival | ||||
| Age (<40/≥40) | 1.370 (0.342–5.491) | 0.656 | ||
| Gender (female/male) | 1.798 (0.449–7.198) | 0.407 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage (I/II–IV) | 3.894 (0.969–15.650) | 0.046* | 2.090 (0.374–11.678) | 0.401 |
| Subtypes (UNKTL/EUNKTL) | 1.515 (0.315–7.320) | 0.603 | ||
| B symptoms (no/yes) | 53.653 (0.233–12,381.115) | 0.151 | ||
| LDH level (normal/elevated) | 5.011 (1.318–19.059) | 0.018* | 1.155 (0.085–15.622) | 0.914 |
| KPI score (0–1/2–4) | 2.723 (0.680–10.908) | 0.157 | ||
| PIT score (0–1/2–4) | 4.063 (1.014–16.290) | 0.048* | 1.284 (0.095–17.339) | 0.851 |
| IPI score (0–1/2–5) | 4.814 (1.289–17.977) | 0.019* | 6.153 (0.361–104.775) | 0.209 |
| MDSC frequency (low/high) | 8.644 (1.073–69.636) | 0.043* | 19.593 (1.694–226.646) | 0.017* |
| In Mo-MDSC population | ||||
| Disease-free survival | ||||
| Age (<40/≥40) | 1.259 (0.355–4.470) | 0.722 | ||
| Gender (female/male) | 1.930 (0.544–6.852) | 0.309 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage (I/II–IV) | 3.434 (0.959–12.293) | 0.045* | 1.549 (0.402–5.970) | 0.525 |
| Subtypes (UNKTL/EUNKTL) | 1.306 (0.277–6.164) | 0.736 | ||
| B symptoms (no/yes) | 55.563 (0.323–9550.869) | 0.126 | ||
| LDH level (normal/elevated) | 3.834 (1.091–13.474) | 0.036* | 1.843 (0.211–16.130) | 0.581 |
| KPI score (0–1/2–4) | 3.417 (0.881–13.250) | 0.076 | ||
| PIT score (0–1/2–4) | 3.031 (0.852–10.785) | 0.084 | ||
| IPI score (0–1/2–5) | 3.718 (1.074–12.874) | 0.038* | 3.181 (0.358–28.269) | 0.299 |
| Mo-MDSC frequency (low/high)a | 5.956 (1.249–28.411) | 0.025* | 7.873 (1.467–42.238) | 0.016* |
| Overall survival | ||||
| Age (<40/≥40) | 1.370 (0.342–5.491) | 0.656 | ||
| Gender (female/male) | 1.798 (0.449–7.198) | 0.407 | ||
| Ann Arbor stage (I/II–IV) | 3.894 (0.969–15.650) | 0.046* | 2.275 (0.436–11.878) | 0.330 |
| Subtypes (UNKTL/EUNKTL) | 1.515 (0.315–7.320) | 0.603 | ||
| B symptoms (no/yes) | 53.653 (0.233–12,381.115) | 0.151 | ||
| LDH level (normal/elevated) | 5.011 (1.318–19.059) | 0.018* | 2.684 (0.240–30.257) | 0.423 |
| KPI score (0–1/2–4) | 2.723 (0.680–10.908) | 0.157 | ||
| PIT score (0–1/2–4) | 4.063 (1.014–16.290) | 0.048* | 0.544 (0.039–7.604) | 0.651 |
| IPI score (0–1/2–5) | 4.814 (1.289–17.977) | 0.019* | 4.432 (0.342–57.364) | 0.254 |
| Mo-MDSC frequency (low/high) | 4.890 (1.004–23.809) | 0.049* | 6.867 (1.243–37.948) | 0.027* |
DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, IPI International Prognostic Index, KPI Korean Prognostic Index, PIT Peripheral T cell lymphoma Prognostic Index
* Significant difference
aMDSC (high/low) is based on the median value of the MDSC density