Literature DB >> 26497772

Significance of lymphadenectomy with splenectomy in radical surgery for advanced (pT3/pT4) remnant gastric cancer.

Hiroki Sugita1, Eri Oda2, Masahiko Hirota2, Shinji Ishikawa2, Shinjiro Tomiyasu2, Hiroshi Tanaka2, Tetsumasa Arita2, Yasushi Yagi2, Hideo Baba3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, the optimal surgical strategy for remnant gastric cancer has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to clarify the significance of lymphadenectomy with splenectomy in remnant gastric cancer surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Kumamoto Regional Medical Center. The primary endpoint was overall survival after surgery. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic features, surgical treatments, and long-term prognosis of remnant gastric cancer patients treated with total gastrectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 80 patients with gastric cancer in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy and who underwent total gastrectomy were enrolled in the study. Splenectomy was performed in 38 patients. Lymph node metastasis in the splenic hilum was not observed in the patients with pT1/pT2 tumors, whereas nodal metastasis at the splenic hilum was detected in 30.4% of the patients with pT3/pT4 tumors. The survival rate of the patients with pT3/pT4 tumors who underwent splenectomy was significantly higher than that of the patients who did not undergo splenectomy, although there was no difference in the patients with pT1/pT2 tumors. Among the patients classified as R0, the survival rate of the patients with pT3/pT4 tumors who underwent splenectomy was significantly higher than that of the patients who did not undergo splenectomy.
CONCLUSION: Lymphadenectomy with splenectomy in radical surgery is beneficial for patients with advanced (pT3/pT4) remnant gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26497772     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  4 in total

1.  Different risks of nodal metastasis by tumor location in remnant gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuya Takahashi; Takaki Yoshikawa; Shinji Morita; Takahiro Kinoshita; Masahiro Yura; Sho Otsuki; Masanori Tokunaga; Yukinori Yamagata; Akio Kaito; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  [Gastric stump carcinoma: frequency, treatment, complications and prognosis].

Authors:  H Nienhüser; S Blank; L Sisic; R Kunzmann; U Heger; K Ott; M W Büchler; T Schmidt; A Ulrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy: Single-center experience.

Authors:  Junya Kitadani; Toshiyasu Ojima; Masaki Nakamura; Keiji Hayata; Masahiro Katsuda; Akihiro Takeuchi; Shinta Tominaga; Naoki Fukuda; Hideki Motobayashi; Tomoki Nakai; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Disadvantages of Complete No. 10 Lymph Node Dissection in Gastric Cancer and the Possibility of Spleen-Preserving Dissection: Review.

Authors:  Tetsuro Toriumi; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.720

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.