Literature DB >> 26497273

Dog and cat management through sterilization: Implications for population dynamics and veterinary public policies.

Ricardo Augusto Dias1, Oswaldo Santos Baquero2, Aline Gil Alves Guilloux2, Caio Figueiredo Moretti2, Tosca de Lucca3, Ricardo Conde Alves Rodrigues4, Cláudio Luiz Castagna4, Douglas Presotto4, Yury Cezar Kronitzky3, José Henrique Hildebrand Grisi-Filho2, Fernando Ferreira2, Marcos Amaku2.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare different sterilization scenarios allowing the adoption of the most adequate strategy to control owned dog and cat population sizes as the official veterinary public policy for animal control in an urban area of Campinas municipality, Brazil. To achieve this goal, the vital parameters of the owned pet population were measured in a neighborhood of Campinas called Jardim Vila Olimpia through questionnaires used in two census studies performed in February 2012 and June 2013. Different hypothetical sterilization scenarios were compared with the scenario of a single sterilization campaign performed in the study area between the census studies. Using a deterministic mathematical model, population dynamics were simulated for these different scenarios. We have observed that for both owned dogs and cats, the impact on the population size achieved by a single sterilization campaign would be diluted over the years, equating to the impact achieved by the usual sterilization rate practiced before the sterilization campaign yearly. Moreover, using local and global sensitivity analyses, we assessed the relative influence on animal population evolution of each vital parameter used in the mathematical models. The more influential parameters for both species were the carrying capacity of the environment and sterilization rates of males and females (for both species). We observed that even with sterilizing 100% of the intact animals annually, it would not be possible to obtain proportions greater than 86% and 88% of sterilized dogs and cats, respectively, after 20 years due to the high introduction of new intact animals. There is no public dog and cat sterilization service in place in the city, and sporadic and local sterilization campaigns are performed with a prior communication to the owners to bring their animals to be sterilized in a selected veterinary facility. If a sterilization campaign was performed annually in the study area, it would have the most favorable cost effectiveness ratio after 20 years compared to the scenarios of 50% and 100% sterilization of intact animals annually. These results allowed the veterinary public policy stakeholders to make decisions based on scientific evidence to implement adequate control of dog and cat populations in urban areas, aiming to reduce zoonosis transmission to humans and other problems associated with uncontrolled animal populations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cat; Cost-effectiveness; Dog; Population control; Sterilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26497273     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  10 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of free-roaming dog population management through systems modelling.

Authors:  Lauren M Smith; Rupert J Quinnell; Conor Goold; Alexandru M Munteanu; Sabine Hartmann; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  The Role of Dog Population Management in Rabies Elimination-A Review of Current Approaches and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Louise H Taylor; Ryan M Wallace; Deepashree Balaram; Joann M Lindenmayer; Douglas C Eckery; Beryl Mutonono-Watkiss; Ellie Parravani; Louis H Nel
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-10

3.  Abundance, survival, recruitment and effectiveness of sterilization of free-roaming dogs: A capture and recapture study in Brazil.

Authors:  Vinícius Silva Belo; Claudio José Struchiner; Guilherme Loureiro Werneck; Rafael Gonçalves Teixeira Neto; Gabriel Barbosa Tonelli; Clóvis Gomes de Carvalho Júnior; Renata Aparecida Nascimento Ribeiro; Eduardo Sérgio da Silva
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spatio-temporal modelling of Leishmania infantum infection among domestic dogs: a simulation study and sensitivity analysis applied to rural Brazil.

Authors:  Elizabeth Buckingham-Jeffery; Edward M Hill; Samik Datta; Erin Dilger; Orin Courtenay
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 5.  Desexing Dogs: A Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Silvan R Urfer; Matt Kaeberlein
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  A Review and Analysis of the National Dog Population Management Program in Chile.

Authors:  Elena Garde; Paula Marín-Vial; Guillermo E Pérez; Erik M Sandvig
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Testes after Non-Surgical Sterilization of Male Dogs with CaCl2 in Alcohol.

Authors:  Vincenzo Cicirelli; Francesco Macrì; Simona Di Pietro; Raffaella Leoci; Giovanni Michele Lacalandra; Giulio Guido Aiudi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Global Strategies for Population Management of Domestic Cats (Felis catus): A Systematic Review to Inform Best Practice Management for Remote Indigenous Communities in Australia.

Authors:  Brooke P A Kennedy; Bonny Cumming; Wendy Y Brown
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Stray Dog Population in a City of Southern Mexico and Its Impact on the Contamination of Public Areas.

Authors:  Gloria R Cortez-Aguirre; Matilde Jiménez-Coello; Eduardo Gutiérrez-Blanco; Antonio Ortega-Pacheco
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2018-09-25

10.  Beliefs and Attitudes of Residents in Queensland, Australia, about Managing Dog and Cat Impacts on Native Wildlife.

Authors:  Jennifer Carter; Mandy B A Paterson; John M Morton; Francisco Gelves-Gomez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.