Philipp Erhart1, Joy Roy2, Jean-Paul P M de Vries3, Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist2, Caspar Grond-Ginsbach4, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr5, Dittmar Böckler5. 1. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany philipp.erhart@med.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Department of Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Neurology, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To associate regions of highest local rupture risk from finite element analysis (FEA) to subsequent rupture sites in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 13 asymptomatic AAA patients (mean age 76 years; 8 men) experiencing rupture at a later point in time between 2005 and 2011. All patients had CTA scans before and during the rupture event. FEA was performed to calculate peak wall stress (PWS), peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), rupture risk equivalent diameters (RRED), and the intraluminal thrombus volume (ILTV). PWS and PWRR locations in the prerupture state were compared with subsequent CTA rupture findings. Visible contrast extravasation was considered a definite (n=5) rupture sign, while a periaortic hematoma was an indefinite (n=8) sign. A statistical comparison was performed between the 13-patient asymptomatic AAA group before and during rupture and a 23-patient diameter-matched asymptomatic AAA control group that underwent elective surgery. RESULTS: The asymptomatic AAAs before rupture showed significantly higher PWRR and RRED values compared to the matched asymptomatic AAA control group (median values 0.74 vs 0.52 and 77 vs 59 mm, respectively; p<0.0001 for both). No statistical differences could be found for PWS and ILTV. Ruptured AAAs showed the highest maximum diameters, PWRR, and RRED values. In 7 of the ruptured AAAs (2 definite and 5 indefinite rupture signs), CTA rupture sites correlated with prerupture PWRR locations. CONCLUSION: The location of the PWRR in unruptured AAAs predicted future rupture sites in several cases. Asymptomatic AAA patients with high PWRR and RRED values have an increased rupture risk.
PURPOSE: To associate regions of highest local rupture risk from finite element analysis (FEA) to subsequent rupture sites in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 13 asymptomatic AAA patients (mean age 76 years; 8 men) experiencing rupture at a later point in time between 2005 and 2011. All patients had CTA scans before and during the rupture event. FEA was performed to calculate peak wall stress (PWS), peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), rupture risk equivalent diameters (RRED), and the intraluminal thrombus volume (ILTV). PWS and PWRR locations in the prerupture state were compared with subsequent CTA rupture findings. Visible contrast extravasation was considered a definite (n=5) rupture sign, while a periaortic hematoma was an indefinite (n=8) sign. A statistical comparison was performed between the 13-patient asymptomatic AAA group before and during rupture and a 23-patient diameter-matched asymptomatic AAA control group that underwent elective surgery. RESULTS: The asymptomatic AAAs before rupture showed significantly higher PWRR and RRED values compared to the matched asymptomatic AAA control group (median values 0.74 vs 0.52 and 77 vs 59 mm, respectively; p<0.0001 for both). No statistical differences could be found for PWS and ILTV. Ruptured AAAs showed the highest maximum diameters, PWRR, and RRED values. In 7 of the ruptured AAAs (2 definite and 5 indefinite rupture signs), CTA rupture sites correlated with prerupture PWRR locations. CONCLUSION: The location of the PWRR in unruptured AAAs predicted future rupture sites in several cases. Asymptomatic AAA patients with high PWRR and RRED values have an increased rupture risk.
Authors: Antti Siika; Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist; Sayid Zommorodi; Olga Nilsson; Patricia Andersson; T Christian Gasser; Joy Roy; Rebecka Hultgren Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist; Marko Bogdanovic; Antti Siika; T Christian Gasser; Rebecka Hultgren; Joy Roy Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 4.379