Literature DB >> 26496560

Safety of Blood Pool Contrast Agent Administration in Children and Young Adults.

Cynthia K Rigsby1,2, Andrada R Popescu1,2, Paige Nelson1, R Jason Orr3, Emma E Boylan1,4, Samantha Schoeneman1, R Andrew deFreitas5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the adverse reaction rate associated with the administration of blood pool contrast material in children and young adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the MRI and pharmacy databases identified all patients who received gadofosveset trisodium from October 1, 2011, to June 30, 2014. Patients were classified as having been anesthetized or not anesthetized for the MRI examinations. A review of the electronic medical records identified adverse reactions recorded within 24 hours of contrast administration. The adverse reactions were graded as mild, moderate, or severe. Risk ratios were calculated between the adverse reaction rate experienced by anesthetized patients and that experience by nonanesthetized patients.
RESULTS: During the study period, 626 patients (mean age, 11.7 years) received 711 doses of gadofosveset trisodium; 137 adverse reactions were recorded, which yields a 19.3% (137/711) adverse reaction rate. There were 115 adverse reactions experienced by 367 anesthetized patients (31.3%): 93.0% (107/115) were mild and 7.0% (8/115) were moderate. The remaining 22 adverse reactions were experienced by 344 (6.4%) nonanesthetized patients, and 90.9% (20/22) were mild. Three nonanesthetized patients had allergiclike reactions; of these allergiclike reactions, one was mild and two were severe for a severe allergiclike reaction rate of 0.28% (2/711). Severe allergiclike reactions were treated without any adverse outcomes. Anesthetized patients were 5.7 times more likely to experience an adverse event than nonanesthetized patients; most reactions in anesthetized patients were seen after the administration of anesthesia alone.
CONCLUSION: Most reactions after gadofosveset trisodium administration in children and young adults are mild; however, severe allergiclike reactions occur, so policies must be in place to treat patients with adverse reactions when using this contrast agent. These data may be useful to centers considering administering gadofosveset trisodium to pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; blood pool contrast agents; children; gadolinium-based contrast agents; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26496560     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

Review 1.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eric M Gale; Peter Caravan; Anil G Rao; Robert J McDonald; Matthew Winfeld; Robert J Fleck; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 2.  Blood pool contrast agents for venous magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Irai S Oliveira; Sandeep S Hedgire; Weier Li; Suvranu Ganguli; Anand M Prabhakar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

3.  Combined blood pool and extracellular contrast agents for pediatric and young adult cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joyce T Johnson; Joshua D Robinson; Jie Deng; Cynthia K Rigsby
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30

4.  Survey of gadolinium-based contrast agent utilization among the members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology: a Quality and Safety Committee report.

Authors:  Einat Blumfield; Michael M Moore; Mary K Drake; Thomas R Goodman; Kristopher N Lewis; Laura T Meyer; Thang D Ngo; Christina Sammet; Arta Luana Stanescu; David W Swenson; Thomas L Slovis; Ramesh S Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiovascular thrombi in children.

Authors:  Pablo Caro-Dominguez; Shi-Joon Yoo; Mike Seed; Lars Grosse-Wortmann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-12-09

Review 6.  General anaesthesia for patients with a history of a contrast medium-induced anaphylaxis: a useful prophylaxis?

Authors:  Ingrid Boehm; Knud Nairz; John Morelli; Patricia Silva Hasembank Keller; Johannes Thomas Heverhagen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  MRI with ferumoxytol: A single center experience of safety across the age spectrum.

Authors:  Kim-Lien Nguyen; Takegawa Yoshida; Fei Han; Ihab Ayad; Brian L Reemtsen; Isidro B Salusky; Gary M Satou; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 5.119

8.  Subsequent MRI of pediatric patients after an adverse reaction to Gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Azadeh Hojreh; Andreas Peyrl; Aleksandra Bundalo; Zsolt Szepfalusi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.