Sang Won Kim1, Hyun Cheol Kim1, Dal Mo Yang1, Kyu Yeoun Won2, Sung Kyoung Moon3. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 149 Sangil-Dong, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 134-727, Korea. 2. 2 Department of Pathology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. 3. 3 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental value of the presence of cystic duct enhancement for diagnosing acute cholecystitis without visible impacted gallstones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 63 patients with acute cholecystitis and 63 control subjects were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two radiologists to determine the presence of cystic duct enhancement or impacted stones. Two additional radiologists were then asked to independently evaluate all CT images using a 5-point scoring system for diagnosing acute cholecystitis. They conducted the evaluations both before and after being informed that cystic duct enhancement could be substituted for a CT finding of impacted gallstones. RESULTS: The prevalence of either cystic duct enhancement or stone impaction was observed to be significantly more common in the patient group (86-91%) than in the control group (6-14%) (p < 0.001) with good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.79). Diagnostic sensitivities increased significantly from 60.3% to 85.7% for reviewer 1 (p = 0.001) and from 71.4% to 87.3% for reviewer 2 (p = 0.028) after the reviewers were informed of the presence of cystic duct enhancement. Diagnostic accuracy increased significantly for the less experienced radiologist, from 75.4% to 87.3% (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The accuracy and sensitivity of CT for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis improved significantly when cystic duct enhancement was used as an alternative to impacted gallstones as a diagnostic criterion.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incremental value of the presence of cystic duct enhancement for diagnosing acute cholecystitis without visible impacted gallstones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of 63 patients with acute cholecystitis and 63 control subjects were retrospectively and independently reviewed by two radiologists to determine the presence of cystic duct enhancement or impacted stones. Two additional radiologists were then asked to independently evaluate all CT images using a 5-point scoring system for diagnosing acute cholecystitis. They conducted the evaluations both before and after being informed that cystic duct enhancement could be substituted for a CT finding of impacted gallstones. RESULTS: The prevalence of either cystic duct enhancement or stone impaction was observed to be significantly more common in the patient group (86-91%) than in the control group (6-14%) (p < 0.001) with good interobserver agreement (κ = 0.79). Diagnostic sensitivities increased significantly from 60.3% to 85.7% for reviewer 1 (p = 0.001) and from 71.4% to 87.3% for reviewer 2 (p = 0.028) after the reviewers were informed of the presence of cystic duct enhancement. Diagnostic accuracy increased significantly for the less experienced radiologist, from 75.4% to 87.3% (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The accuracy and sensitivity of CT for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis improved significantly when cystic duct enhancement was used as an alternative to impacted gallstones as a diagnostic criterion.
Authors: Michele Pisano; Niccolò Allievi; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefania Cimbanassi; Djamila Boerna; Federico Coccolini; Andrea Tufo; Marcello Di Martino; Jeffrey Leung; Massimo Sartelli; Marco Ceresoli; Ronald V Maier; Elia Poiasina; Nicola De Angelis; Stefano Magnone; Paola Fugazzola; Ciro Paolillo; Raul Coimbra; Salomone Di Saverio; Belinda De Simone; Dieter G Weber; Boris E Sakakushev; Alessandro Lucianetti; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Gustavo P Fraga; Imitaz Wani; Walter L Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Ernest E Moore; Ari Leppäniemi; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 5.469