Neil Seeman1, Sabrina Tang2, Adalsteinn D Brown3, Alton Ing2. 1. RIWI Corp., Massey College, University of Toronto, 4 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2E1; Institute for Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 3M7; Massey College, University of Toronto, 4 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2E1. Electronic address: neil.seeman@utoronto.ca. 2. RIWI Corp., Massey College, University of Toronto, 4 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2E1. 3. Institute for Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 3M7; Massey College, University of Toronto, 4 Devonshire Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2E1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To obtain rapid and reproducible opinions that address mental illness stigma around the world. METHOD: Random global Web users were exposed to brief questions, asking whether they interacted daily with someone with mental illness, whether they believed that mental illness was associated with violence, whether it was similar to physical illness, and whether it could be overcome. RESULTS: Over a period of 1.7 years, 596,712 respondents from 229 countries completed the online survey. The response rate was 54.3%. China had the highest proportion of respondents in daily contact with a person with mental illness. In developed countries, 7% to 8% of respondents endorsed the statement that individuals with mental illness were more violent than others, in contrast to 15% or 16% in developing countries. While 45% to 51% of respondents from developed countries believed that mental illness was similar to physical illness, only 7% believed that mental illness could be overcome. To test for reproducibility, 21 repeats of the same questions were asked monthly in India for 21 months. Each time, 10.1 ± 0.11% s.e., of respondents endorsed the statement that persons who suffer from mental illness are more violent than others, indicating strong reproducibility of response. CONCLUSION: This study shows that surveys of constructs such as stigma towards mental illness can be carried out rapidly and repeatedly across the globe, so that the impact of policy interventions can be readily measured. LIMITATIONS: The method engages English speakers only, mainly young, educated males.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain rapid and reproducible opinions that address mental illness stigma around the world. METHOD: Random global Web users were exposed to brief questions, asking whether they interacted daily with someone with mental illness, whether they believed that mental illness was associated with violence, whether it was similar to physical illness, and whether it could be overcome. RESULTS: Over a period of 1.7 years, 596,712 respondents from 229 countries completed the online survey. The response rate was 54.3%. China had the highest proportion of respondents in daily contact with a person with mental illness. In developed countries, 7% to 8% of respondents endorsed the statement that individuals with mental illness were more violent than others, in contrast to 15% or 16% in developing countries. While 45% to 51% of respondents from developed countries believed that mental illness was similar to physical illness, only 7% believed that mental illness could be overcome. To test for reproducibility, 21 repeats of the same questions were asked monthly in India for 21 months. Each time, 10.1 ± 0.11% s.e., of respondents endorsed the statement that persons who suffer from mental illness are more violent than others, indicating strong reproducibility of response. CONCLUSION: This study shows that surveys of constructs such as stigma towards mental illness can be carried out rapidly and repeatedly across the globe, so that the impact of policy interventions can be readily measured. LIMITATIONS: The method engages English speakers only, mainly young, educated males.
Authors: Elizabeth M Stone; Lisa Nawei Chen; Gail L Daumit; Sarah Linden; Emma E McGinty Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Rikki H Sargent; Shaelyn Laurie; Leah Moncada; Leo F Weakland; James V Lavery; Daniel A Salmon; Walter A Orenstein; Robert F Breiman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Justin D Rasmussen; Bernard Kakuhikire; Charles Baguma; Scholastic Ashaba; Christine E Cooper-Vince; Jessica M Perkins; David R Bangsberg; Alexander C Tsai Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sanam Roder-DeWan; Anna Gage; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Jerker Liljestrand; Kwanele Asante-Shongwe; Talhiya Yahya; Margaret Kruk Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2020-08