| Literature DB >> 26495184 |
Pardis Hosseinzadeh1, Alireza A Shamshirsaz2, Pouya Javadian1, Jimmy Espinoza3, Manisha Gandhi1, Rodrigo Ruano2, Darrell L Cass4, Oluyinka A Olutoye4, Michael A Belfort2.
Abstract
Objective To review techniques and outcomes of different prenatal treatments for large placental chorioangiomas. Study Design Presentation of a case of laparoscopic-assisted laser coagulation and a systematic review of the literature for articles related to intervention for placental chorioangioma. Results A total of 37 cases of definitive (n = 23) and supportive therapy (n = 14) were evaluated, including one case treated in our center. Approximately 35% of the patients had a spontaneous preterm delivery in definitive treatment group versus 36% in the supportive group. The infant survival rates were 65 and 71% in the two groups, respectively. We further compared the two types of laser ablation (fetoscopic [n = 10] and interstitial [n = 4]). Approximately 30% of the patients in the fetoscopic and 25% in interstitial group, had a spontaneous preterm delivery. Survival rates were 60 and 100% in fetoscopic and interstitial groups, respectively. Conclusion Laser ablation and embolization of chorioangiomas via minimally invasive approach may prevent or reverse fetal hydrops due to high cardiac states. However, further studies are needed to refine the appropriate selection criteria that will justify the risk of this invasive in utero therapy for chorioangiomas.Entities:
Keywords: chorioangioma; laser ablation; nonimmune hydrops fetalis; systematic review
Year: 2015 PMID: 26495184 PMCID: PMC4603846 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AJP Rep ISSN: 2157-7005
Fig. 1Color Doppler image of feeding vessels of placenta (A) before and (B) after laser intervention.
Fig. 2Three-dimensional ultrasound image of vascularity of an involved area of placenta with chorioangioma. (A) Before and (B) after intervention.
Fig. 3Gross specimen showing placenta and the area of laser ablation for chorioangioma.
Published chorioangioma therapy
|
| |
| Amnioreduction ( | Bashiri, 1998 |
| Jauniaux and Ogle, 2000 | |
| Sepulveda et al, 2003 | |
| Intrauterine blood transfusion ( | Haak, 1999 |
| Hamill et al, 2003 ( | |
| Esscribano, 2006 | |
| Transplacental pharmacotherapy ( | Wang, 1996 |
| Zalel, 2002 | |
| Al Wattar et al, 2014 | |
|
| |
| Interstitial laser ablation ( | Bhide et al, 2003 |
| Zanardini et al, 2010 | |
| Fetoscopic laser ablation ( | Quintero et al, 1996 |
| Quarello et al, 2005 | |
| Bermudez, 2007 | |
| Sepulveda et al, 2009 | |
| Mendez-Figueroa et al, 2009 | |
| Zanardini et al, 2010 | |
| Kathryn Jones, 2012 | |
| Our case ( | |
| Alcohol injection ( | Nicolini et al, 1999 |
| Jauniaux and Ogle, 2000 | |
| Wanapirak et al, 2002 | |
| Sepulveda et al, 2003 | |
| Deren et al, 2007 | |
| Embolization ( | Lau et al, 2003 |
| Babic et al, 2012 | |
Outcome of fetuses with chorioangioma that underwent definitive therapy versus supportive therapy and fetoscopic versus interstitial laser ablation of the tumor
| Definitive therapy | Supportive therapy |
| Fetoscopic laser | Interstitial laser |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA at diagnosis (wks), mean ± SD | 23.3 ± 2.8 | 24.4 ± 3.2 | 0.55 | 23.1 ± 0.5 | 25.3 ± 2.4 | 0.63 |
| GA at intervention (wks), mean ± SD | 25.6 ± 2.2 | 25.5 ± 2.1 | 0.95 | 25.3 ± 1.9 | 25.6 ± 2.18 | 0.95 |
| GA at delivery (wks), mean ± SD | 32.2 ± 5.0 | 33.5 ± 5.1 | 0.85 | 32.1 ± 5.5 | 35.2 ± 3.5 | 0.03 |
| Tumor size at intervention (mm), mean ± SD | 65 ± 18 | 66 ± 15 | 0.12 | 63 ± 15 | 46 ± 8 | 0.23 |
| Fetal anemia | 7 (30%) | 3 (21%) | 0.55 | 2 (20%) | 0 | 0.33 |
| Blood transfusion | 7 (30%) | 3 (21%) | 0.55 | 2 (20%) | 0 | 0.33 |
| Polyhydraminos resolution | 8/13 (61%) | 3/10 (30%) | 0.36 | 5/8 (62%) | 0/0 (No case) | Noncomparable |
| Hydrops resolution | 1/7 (14%) | 0/3 (0%) | 0.46 | 0/2(0%) | 0/0 (No case) | Noncomparable |
| Amnioreduction | 3 (13%) | 5 (36%) | 0.11 | 2 (20%) | 0 | 0.33 |
| PPROM | 8 (35%) | 5 (36%) | 0.95 | 3 (30%) | 1 (25%) | 0.85 |
| Neonatal survival | 15 (65%) | 10 (71%) | 0.69 | 6 (60%) | 4 (100%) | 0.13 |
Abbreviations: GA, gestational age; PPROM, premature preterm rupture of membrane; SD, standard deviation.
Prediction of survival after prenatal tumor laser ablation and embolization of the chorioangioma
| Survived | Fetal loss |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA at diagnosis (wks) | 22.2 ± 4.2 | 24.2 ± 0.4 | 0.02 |
| Tumor size at intervention (mm) | 54 ± 14 | 71 ± 13 | 0.06 |
| Fetal anemia | 0 (0%) | 3 (50%) | 0.01 |
| Polyhydramnios | 5 (45%) | 4 (67%) | 0.40 |
| Hydrops | 1 (9%) | 3 (50%) | 0.05 |
| Amnioreduction | 1 (9%) | 1 (17%) | 0.46 |
| GA at intervention (wks) | 25.6 ± 2.2 | 24.9 ± 1.1 | 0.08 |
| GA at delivery (wks) | 35.6 ± 3.6 | 27.3 ± 1.6 | 0.04 |
| Repeat fetal intervention | 2 (20%) | 2 (50%) | 0.26 |
| Type of treatment | |||
| Fetoscopic | 10 | 4 | 0.21 |
| Embolization | 1 | 2 | |
| PPROM | 1 (9%) | 5 (83.3%) | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: GA, gestational age; PPROM, premature preterm rupture of membrane; SD, standard deviation.