Literature DB >> 26495181

Exstrophy-Epispadias Complex in a Newborn: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Enrico Valerio1, Valentina Vanzo1, Patrizia Zaramella1, Sabrina Salvadori1, Marco Castagnetti2, Eugenio Baraldi1.   

Abstract

Aim The aim of this report is to present a brief review of the current literature on the management of EEC. Case Report A term male neonate presented at birth with classic bladder exstrophy, a variant of the exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC). The defect was covered with sterile silicon gauzes and waterproof dressing; at 72 hours of life, primary closure without osteotomy of bladder, pelvis, and abdominal wall was successfully performed. Discussion EEC incidence is approximately 2.15 per 1,00,000 live births; several urological, musculocutaneous, spinal, orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and gynecological anomalies may be associated to EEC. Initial medical management includes use of occlusive dressings to prevent air contact and dehydration of the open bladder template. Umbilical catheters should not be positioned. Surgical repair stages include initial closure of the bladder and abdominal wall with or without osteotomy, followed by epispadias repair at 6 to 12 months, and bladder neck repair around 5 years of life. Those who fail to attain continence eventually undergo bladder augmentation and placement of a catheterizable conduit. Conclusion Modern-staged repair of EEC guarantees socially acceptable urinary continence in up to 80% of cases; sexual function can be an issue in the long term, but overall quality of life can be good.

Entities:  

Keywords:  congenital disease; exstrophy–epispadias complex; neonatology; newborn; urology

Year:  2015        PMID: 26495181      PMCID: PMC4603851          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1556759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJP Rep        ISSN: 2157-7005


A male newborn was delivered vaginally at 385/7 weeks. Pregnancy was uneventful, and no fetal anomalies were detected at prenatal ultrasound controls. Maternal serologies for HbsAg, HCV, HIV, Toxoplasma, and Rubella were negative, as was vaginal swab. Delivery was not complicated and Apgar Score was 9 at 1st, 9 at 5th, and 10 at 10th minute of life. The neonate presented at birth with a genitourinary defect consistent with the classic bladder exstrophy variant of the exstrophy–epispadias complex (EEC). Exposed, everted bladder template was clearly visible immediately below umbilical stump; a completely dorsally opened (epispadic) urethral plate run from bladder neck down to the open glans; left and right corpora cavernosa were clearly visible beneath and alongside urethral plate; the scrotum was normally developed, but caudally displaced; anus was normal (Fig. 1). Physical examination was otherwise unremarkable. The defect was covered in delivery room with sterile silicon gauzes and transparent waterproof dressing. Prudently, no umbilical vascular catheters were positioned at birth. Cerebral, cardiac, abdominal, and kidney ultrasound were then performed, turning out to be normal. Pelvic ultrasound esteemed a pubic symphysis diastasis of 28 mm. At 72 hours of life, primary closure of bladder, pelvis, and abdominal wall was performed successfully, without pelvic osteotomy. Two ureteral catheters, one transurethral catheter and an epicystostomy tube were left indwelling. In the first 5 postoperative days, the patient was kept immobilized with pelvis and lower limbs wrapped around and suspended in a special hammock device (modified Bryant traction) (Fig. 2).1 Parenteral nutrition was administered during this period. Curarization was maintained for the first 5 days after surgery; systemic sedoanalgesia was gradually tapered, and ultimately stopped 10 days after surgery. Full enteral feeding was restored at day 10 postoperatively. A perirenal urinoma was registered as a postoperative complication. Tubes were sequentially removed during the fourth postoperative week, and patient was discharged on postoperative day 28. Patient was kept in a thoracopelvic orthosis for the first 2 month of life.2 Further surgery for epispadias repair is scheduled at the age of 9 months of life.
Fig. 1

Male newborn with classic bladder exstrophy. Exposed, everted bladder template is clearly visible immediately below umbilical stump; a completely dorsally opened (epispadic) urethral plate runs from bladder neck down to the open glans; left and right corpora cavernosa are visible beneath and alongside urethral plate; the scrotum is caudally displaced.

Fig. 2

Postoperative patient immobilization with pelvis and lower limbs wrapped around and suspended in a special hammock device (modified Bryant traction).

Male newborn with classic bladder exstrophy. Exposed, everted bladder template is clearly visible immediately below umbilical stump; a completely dorsally opened (epispadic) urethral plate runs from bladder neck down to the open glans; left and right corpora cavernosa are visible beneath and alongside urethral plate; the scrotum is caudally displaced. Postoperative patient immobilization with pelvis and lower limbs wrapped around and suspended in a special hammock device (modified Bryant traction).

Discussion

What is Exstrophy–Epispadias Complex

EEC encompasses a spectrum of pathologies going from isolated epispadias, to classic bladder exstrophy, to cloacal exstrophy as the most severe—and rarest–presentation.3 Next to the bladder, the malformation involves the genitalia, the abdominal wall muscles, the pelvic floor musculature, and the bony pelvis.4

Epidemiology

The overall incidence of EEC has been estimated by Nelson et al5 in 2.15 per 100,000 live births, with an even male-to-female ratio (odds ratio, 0.989; 95% confidence interval 0.88–1.12), and a significantly increased incidence in white compared with nonwhite neonates (incidence, 2.63 vs. 1.54 per 100,000; p < 0.0001). Classic bladder exstrophy occurs in 1:10,000 to 1:50,000 live births6; epispadias is estimated to occur in 1:117,000 live births, and cloacal exstrophy in 1:250,000 births.7

Embryology and Associated Conditions

EEC derives from a derangement in mesodermal layers fusion during the first weeks of fetal life. Normally, at the end of third week of gestation, intermediate layer of mesoderm starts to invaginate to give origin to the urogenital system, while the lateral plate mesoderm will contribute in forming the primitive gut tube.3 A disruption in this interaction, possibly related to a cloacal membrane overgrowth preventing medial migration of mesenchymal tissue, is reported to give origin to EEC8; severity of the resulting condition depends on the point at which disturbed mesodermal layers interaction begins. Given the embryological origin of the disorder, EEC is often associated with other peculiar orthopedic, musculocutaneous, and gynecological conditions. Associated upper urinary tract anomalies are rare. Gastrointestinal and spinal/neurological anomalies can be associated in patients with cloacal exstrophy (Table 1).3 4 9
Table 1

EEC—commonly associated conditions

Urological
 Stenosis/obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction
 Vesicoureteral reflux
 Ectopic kidney
 Horseshoe kidney
 Renal dysplasia/agenesis
 Megaureter
 Ureteral ectopy
 Ureterocele
Musculocutaneous
 Abdominal wall defects
 Divergent distal rectus abdominis muscles
 Umbilical hernia
Spinal/neurological
 Neural tube defects
 Vertebral anomalies
 Myelodysplasia and/or myelomeningocele
 Dysraphism
 Tethered cord
Orthopedic
 Clubfoot deformities
 Absence of feet
 Tibial or fibular deformities
 Hip dislocations
 Pubic symphysis gap
 Open-book configuration of the pelvis
Gastrointestinal
 Common hindgut remnant
 Anteriorly displaced anus
 Imperforate anus
 Rectal stenosis
 Rectal prolapse
 Omphalocele
 Gastrointestinal malrotation/duplication
 Short bowel syndrome
 Duodenal atresia
 Small short bowel deletion
Gynecological
 Vaginal/uterine prolapse
 Müllerian anomalies (e.g., vagina and/or uterus duplication, vaginal agenesia)

Abbreviation: EEC, exstrophy–epispadias complex.

Abbreviation: EEC, exstrophy–epispadias complex.

Medical and Surgical Management

Immediate medical management of EEC consists of covering the extruding viscera with sterile silicon gauzes plus a surmounting occlusive dressing to prevent air contact and dehydration of the exstrophic plaque. Umbilical catheters should not be positioned. No prophylactic antibiotic therapy is mandatory at birth if no physical signs of infection are detectable; on the contrary, postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment is advisable to avoid potential postoperative complications (see section “Long-Term Complications and Outcome”). Surgical correction varies depending on the type and severity of the defect; most of the neonates, however, will need closure of the bladder and abdominal wall, repair of epispadias, ureteral reimplantation, and bladder neck repair. Some of them will also require pelvic osteotomy to facilitate relaxation of the abdominal wall during closure. Osteotomy might possibly also improve functional outcomes of genitourinary reconstruction.10 Criteria proposed to select cases requiring an osteotomy include patients undergoing closure after 72 hours of life, when the pelvis becomes more stiff, those with a pubic diastasis wider than 4 cm, and those with a nonmalleable pelvis. Under these circumstances, the osteotomy is performed at the same time as exstrophy closure (i.e., combined pelvic osteotomy).11 In patients with extremely wide pubic diastases (> 6 cm, most often associated with cloacal exstrophy), a strategy involving osteotomy before bladder closure (i.e., staged pelvic osteotomy) has been proposed to allow gradual reduction in diastasis with slow stretching of pelvic soft tissue.12 Postoperatively, management key factors for the success of closure include immobilization and traction of the lower limbs, appropriate urinary drainage, curarization, analgesia (also using epidural catheters when possible), broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis, and parenteral nutrition. Currently, a staged approach is the strategy most commonly used. Alternatively, the neonatal primary complete repair and the deferred primary complete repair have been proposed.13 14 In the standard-staged repair, a primary closure of the bladder without osteotomy, and without genital reconstruction in males, is attempted in the first 72 hours of life; between 6 and 12 months of age, the epispadias repair is performed in males. Bladder neck reconstruction follows around the age of 5 years, if a reasonable bladder capacity is reached. Patients whose bladders fail to grow before bladder neck reconstruction (to at least 100 mL of capacity), or fail keep growing after bladder neck reconstruction thereby causing persistent incontinence or upper urinary tract deterioration, are candidate to undergo augmentation cystoplasty. A segment of sigmoid colon or ileum can be used to augment the bladder.15 Augmented bladders generally lose the ability to empty volitionally to completion; therefore, periodical clean intermittent catheterizations become necessary. As the reconstructed urethra is unreliable for catheterization, bladder augmentation is combined with placement of a catheterizable conduit bridging the bladder to the skin. The conduit can be created using the appendix (i.e., Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy) or a 2 to 3 cm long segment of ileum (i.e., Monti ileovesicostomy) and should be patent to a 12–14 Ch tube.16 The most common complications include stomal stenosis and urinary leakage via the conduit.17 The appendix is generally less keen than is the ileal tissue to develop complications.18

Long-Term Complications and Outcome

Modern-staged repair of the EEC as previously described has shifted the goal from patient's survival to quality of life. The single most important outcome in bladder exstrophy repair is probably urinary continence,18 which is more easily achieved with successful primary bladder closure and good bladder growth.19 The latter occurs as an adaptation of the bladder wall to the increase in bladder outlet resistances after bladder closure and after bladder neck reconstruction. Of note, this increase in resistances should never happen at the cost of upper urinary tract deterioration, which may occur in case of poorly compliant bladders with incomplete emptying.20 Reportedly, up to 80% of cases can achieve a socially acceptable urinary continence (3-hour dry interval during daytime and volitional voiding) using this surgical strategy.21 Nevertheless, many series report that 20 to 50% of cases will require bladder augmentation eventually.15 Genital function keeps being a relevant problem in patients with exstrophy long term. Males can experience problems for the presence of a short penis or persistent penile curvature.22 Excessive bladder-neck tapering may cause seminal obstruction and recurrent epididymitis leading to infertility. Female patients can experience problems because of the abnormal genital appearance, stenosis of the vaginal introitus, and pelvic organ prolapse.23 These problems, however, do not generally impair a good quality of life.24 Although patients with exstrophy have almost invariably an abnormal gait in the long term because of the recurrence of the pelvic diastasis, which invariably recurs also in patients undergoing osteotomy, long-term orthopedic complications are rare.25 Patients receiving an osteotomy may experience transient of persistent nerve damage, hip pain, and unequal length of limbs.26

Conclusion

Reportedly, modern-staged repair of EEC can achieve a socially acceptable urinary continence (3-hour dry interval during daytime and volitional voiding) in up to 80% of cases after successful primary closure21; sexual function can be an issue in the long term (particularly in males),22 23 but overall quality of life can be good.24
  25 in total

1.  Thoraco-pelvic orthosis: a portable and removable bassinet for secure patient immobilization after primary bladder exstrophy closure.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Alfredo Berrettini; Francesco Beniamin; Waifro Rigamonti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Safety and efficacy of staged pelvic osteotomies in the modern treatment of cloacal exstrophy.

Authors:  Brian M Inouye; Ali Tourchi; Heather N Di Carlo; Ezekiel E Young; Joyce Mhlanga; Joan S Ko; Paul D Sponseller; John P Gearhart
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Bladder exstrophy repair: complete primary repair of exstrophy.

Authors:  Michael E Mitchell
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Sexual function in boys born with exstrophy, myelomeningocele, and micropenis.

Authors:  C R Woodhouse
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Cloacal exstrophy and related abdominal wall defects in Manitoba: incidence and demographic factors.

Authors:  J A Evans; K D Darvill; C Trevenen; C Rockman-Greenberg
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Exstrophy closure: a followup on 70 cases.

Authors:  J K Lattimer; M J Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Long-term follow-up of male patients after reconstruction of the bladder-exstrophy-epispadias complex: psychosocial status, continence, renal and genital function.

Authors:  Anne K Ebert; Günter Schott; Monika Bals-Pratsch; Bernd Seifert; Wolfgang H Rösch
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Urologic complications of major genitourinary reconstruction in the exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Authors:  Brian M Inouye; Bhavik B Shah; Eric Z Massanyi; Heather N Di Carlo; Adam J Kern; Ali Tourchi; Nima Baradaran; Dylan Stewart; John P Gearhart
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 9.  Standing the test of time: long-term outcome of reconstruction of the exstrophy bladder.

Authors:  C R J Woodhouse; Amanda C North; John P Gearhart
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The place of pelvic osteotomy in the modern era of bladder exstrophy reconstruction.

Authors:  A D Baird; P D Sponseller; J P Gearhart
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological control of urinary bladder storage and voiding-functional changes through development and pathology.

Authors:  Youko Ikeda
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.