Yeon Dong Kim1, Hyun Seog Moon2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. ; Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Iksan, Korea. 2. Department of Pain Medicine, MHS Interventional Pain Treatment Center, Gwangju, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain medicine often requires medico-legal involvement, even though diagnosis and treatments have improved considerably. Multiple guidelines for pain physicians contain many recommendations regarding interventional treatment. Unfortunately, no definite treatment guidelines exist because there is no complete consensus among individual guidelines. Pain intervention procedures are widely practiced and highly associated with adverse events and complications. However, a comprehensive, systemic review of medical-dispute cases (MDCs) in Korea has not yet been reported. The purpose of this article is to analyze the frequency and type of medical dispute activity undertaken by pain specialists in Korea. METHODS: Data on medical disputes cases were collected through the Korea Medical Association mutual aid and through a private medical malpractice liability insurance company. Data regarding the frequency and type of MDCs, along with brief case descriptions, were obtained. RESULTS: Pain in the lumbar region made up a major proportion of MDCs and compensation costs. Infection, nerve injury, and diagnosis related cases were the most major contents of MDCs. Only a small proportion of cases involved patient death or unconsciousness, but compensation costs were the highest. CONCLUSIONS: More systemic guidelines and recommendations on interventional pain management are needed, especially those focused on medico-legal cases. Complications arising from pain management procedures and treatments may be avoided by physicians who have the required knowledge and expertise regarding anatomy and pain intervention procedures and know how to recognize procedural aberrations as soon as they occur.
BACKGROUND:Pain medicine often requires medico-legal involvement, even though diagnosis and treatments have improved considerably. Multiple guidelines for pain physicians contain many recommendations regarding interventional treatment. Unfortunately, no definite treatment guidelines exist because there is no complete consensus among individual guidelines. Pain intervention procedures are widely practiced and highly associated with adverse events and complications. However, a comprehensive, systemic review of medical-dispute cases (MDCs) in Korea has not yet been reported. The purpose of this article is to analyze the frequency and type of medical dispute activity undertaken by pain specialists in Korea. METHODS: Data on medical disputes cases were collected through the Korea Medical Association mutual aid and through a private medical malpractice liability insurance company. Data regarding the frequency and type of MDCs, along with brief case descriptions, were obtained. RESULTS:Pain in the lumbar region made up a major proportion of MDCs and compensation costs. Infection, nerve injury, and diagnosis related cases were the most major contents of MDCs. Only a small proportion of cases involved patientdeath or unconsciousness, but compensation costs were the highest. CONCLUSIONS: More systemic guidelines and recommendations on interventional pain management are needed, especially those focused on medico-legal cases. Complications arising from pain management procedures and treatments may be avoided by physicians who have the required knowledge and expertise regarding anatomy and pain intervention procedures and know how to recognize procedural aberrations as soon as they occur.
Authors: Sidney C Smith; Emelia J Benjamin; Robert O Bonow; Lynne T Braun; Mark A Creager; Barry A Franklin; Raymond J Gibbons; Scott M Grundy; Loren F Hiratzka; Daniel W Jones; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Margo Minissian; Lori Mosca; Eric D Peterson; Ralph L Sacco; John Spertus; James H Stein; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Samer Narouze; Honorio T Benzon; David A Provenzano; Asokumar Buvanendran; José De Andres; Timothy R Deer; Richard Rauck; Marc A Huntoon Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Dermot R Fitzgibbon; James P Rathmell; Edward Michna; Linda S Stephens; Karen L Posner; Karen B Domino Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Philipp Lirk; Christian Kolbitsch; Guenther Putz; Joshua Colvin; Hans Peter Colvin; Ingo Lorenz; Christian Keller; Lukas Kirchmair; Josef Rieder; Bernhard Moriggl Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Hyung Tae Kim; Sae Young Kim; Gyung Jo Byun; Byung Chul Shin; Jin Young Lee; Eun Joo Choi; Jong Bum Choi; Ji Hee Hong; Seung Won Choi; Yeon Dong Kim Journal: Korean J Pain Date: 2017-09-29
Authors: Jae Yun Kim; Jae Hang Shim; Sung Jun Hong; Jong Yeun Yang; Hey Ran Choi; Yun Hee Lim; Ho Sik Moon; Jaemoon Lee; Jae Hun Kim Journal: Korean J Pain Date: 2017-03-31