Literature DB >> 26494839

Clinical, instrumental, serological and histological findings suggest that hemophilia B may be less severe than hemophilia A.

Daniela Melchiorre1, Silvia Linari2, Mirko Manetti3, Eloisa Romano4, Francesco Sofi5, Marco Matucci-Cerinic4, Christian Carulli6, Massimo Innocenti6, Lidia Ibba-Manneschi3, Giancarlo Castaman2.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that patients with severe hemophilia B may have a less severe disease compared to severe hemophilia A. To investigate clinical, radiological, laboratory and histological differences in the arthropathy of severe hemophilia A and hemophilia B, 70 patients with hemophilia A and 35 with hemophilia B with at least one joint bleeding were consecutively enrolled. Joint bleedings (<10, 10-50, >50), regimen of treatment (prophylaxis/on demand), World Federation of Hemophilia, Pettersson and ultrasound scores, serum soluble RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin were assessed in all patients. RANK, RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin expression was evaluated in synovial tissue from 18 hemophilia A and 4 hemophilia B patients. The percentage of patients with either 10-50 or more than 50 hemarthrosis was greater in hemophilia A than in hemophilia B (P<0.001 and P=0.03, respectively), while that with less than 10 hemarthrosis was higher in hemophilia B (P<0.0001). World Federation of Hemophilia (36.6 vs. 20.2; P<0.0001) and ultrasound (10.9 vs. 4.3; P<0.0001) score mean values were significantly higher in hemophilia A patients. Serum osteoprotegerin and soluble RANK ligand were decreased in hemophilia A versus hemophilia B (P<0.0001 and P=0.006, respectively). Osteoprotegerin expression was markedly reduced in synovial tissue from hemophilia A patients. In conclusion, the reduced number of hemarthrosis, the lower World Federation of Hemophilia and ultrasound scores, and higher osteoprotegerin expression in serum and synovial tissue in hemophilia B suggest that hemophilia B is a less severe disease than hemophilia A. Osteoprotegerin reduction seems to play a pivotal role in the progression of arthropathy in hemophilia A. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26494839      PMCID: PMC4938330          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  35 in total

1.  [Haemophilia A and haemophilia B. Are there relevant clinical differences?].

Authors:  R Klamroth; M Orlovic; C Kubicek-Hofman; S Gottstein
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 2.  Cartilage damage in the haemophilic joints: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.276

3.  Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density.

Authors:  W S Simonet; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan; M Kelley; M S Chang; R Lüthy; H Q Nguyen; S Wooden; L Bennett; T Boone; G Shimamoto; M DeRose; R Elliott; A Colombero; H L Tan; G Trail; J Sullivan; E Davy; N Bucay; L Renshaw-Gegg; T M Hughes; D Hill; W Pattison; P Campbell; S Sander; G Van; J Tarpley; P Derby; R Lee; W J Boyle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Exposure of human cartilage tissue to low concentrations of blood for a short period of time leads to prolonged cartilage damage: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nathalie W D Jansen; Goris Roosendaal; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Jeroen Degroot; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-01

5.  Prophylaxis: musculoskeletal evaluation.

Authors:  M S Gilbert
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 6.  Radiological assessment of haemophilic arthropathy with emphasis on MRI findings.

Authors:  R F Kilcoyne; R Nuss
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.287

7.  RANK-RANKL-OPG in hemophilic arthropathy: from clinical and imaging diagnosis to histopathology.

Authors:  Daniela Melchiorre; Anna Franca Milia; Silvia Linari; Eloisa Romano; Gemma Benelli; Mirko Manetti; Serena Guiducci; Claudia Ceccarelli; Massimo Innocenti; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Morfini; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Lidia Ibba-Manneschi
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 8.  Understanding haemophilic arthropathy: an exploration of current open issues.

Authors:  Nathalie W D Jansen; Goris Roosendaal; Floris P J G Lafeber
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 9.  Haemophilias A and B.

Authors:  Paula H B Bolton-Maggs; K John Pasi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The use of prophylaxis in 2663 children and adults with haemophilia: results of the 2006 Canadian national haemophilia prophylaxis survey.

Authors:  T T Biss; A K Chan; V S Blanchette; L N Iwenofu; M McLimont; M D Carcao
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 4.287

View more
  17 in total

1.  The higher prevalence of missense mutations in hemophilia B compared to hemophilia A could be important in determining a milder clinical phenotype in patients with severe hemophilia B.

Authors:  Daniela Melchiorre; Silvia Linari; Giancarlo Castaman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  A contribution to the debate about the possible different clinical severity between hemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Daniela Melchiorre; Silvia Linari; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Giancarlo Castaman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Why should hemophilia B be milder than hemophilia A?

Authors:  Shrimati Shetty; Kanjaksha Ghosh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  A milder clinical course for severe hemophilia B: a true or biased effect?

Authors:  Jasper H A van Miert; Hilde Hop; Jaime F Borjas-Howard; Karina Meijer
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Haemophilia B is clinically less severe than haemophilia A: further evidence.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  FVIII regulates the molecular profile of endothelial cells: functional impact on the blood barrier and macrophage behavior.

Authors:  Marie Cadé; Javier Muñoz-Garcia; Antoine Babuty; Louis Paré; Denis Cochonneau; Karim Fekir; Mathias Chatelais; Marie-Françoise Heymann; Anna Lokajczyk; Catherine Boisson-Vidal; Dominique Heymann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Targeting anticoagulant protein S to improve hemostasis in hemophilia.

Authors:  Raja Prince; Luca Bologna; Mirko Manetti; Daniela Melchiorre; Irene Rosa; Natacha Dewarrat; Silvia Suardi; Poorya Amini; José A Fernández; Laurent Burnier; Claudia Quarroz; Maria Desiré Reina Caro; Yasuhiro Matsumura; Johanna A Kremer Hovinga; John H Griffin; Hans-Uwe Simon; Lidia Ibba-Manneschi; François Saller; Sara Calzavarini; Anne Angelillo-Scherrer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 25.476

8.  Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecular-1 is a potential biological indicator of hemophilic arthropathy.

Authors:  Yu-Hsin Tseng; Shyh-Shin Chiou; Yu-Sheng Zeng; Shih-Pien Tsai; Chun-Shih Chen; Yu-Mei Liao; Pei-Chin Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of Hemophilic Arthropathy.

Authors:  Daniela Melchiorre; Mirko Manetti; Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-06-25       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  [Retrospectively analysis of the difference of bleeding frequency and hemophilic arthropathy between hemophilia A and hemophilia B patients].

Authors:  S X Wang; Y Guan; Y B Nie; H Y Li; B Y Sun; X Y Wang; R C Yang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.