| Literature DB >> 26494729 |
P W Hendriks1, J A Kirkegaard2, J M Lilley2, P J Gregory3, G J Rebetzke4.
Abstract
Genetic modification of shoot and root morphology has potential to improve water and nutrient uptake of wheat crops in rainfed environments. Near-isogenic lines (NILs) varying for a tillering inhibition (tin) gene and representing multiple genetic backgrounds were phenotyped in contrasting, controlled environments for shoot and root growth. Leaf area, shoot and root biomass were similar until tillering, whereupon reduced tillering in tin-containing NILs produced reductions of up to 60% in total leaf area and biomass, and increases in total root length of up to 120% and root biomass to 145%. Together, the root-to-shoot ratio increased two-fold with the tin gene. The influence of tin on shoot and root growth was greatest in the cv. Banks genetic background, particularly in the biculm-selected NIL, and was typically strongest in cooler environments. A separate de-tillering study confirmed greater root-to-shoot ratios with regular tiller removal in non-tin-containing genotypes. In validating these observations in a rainfed field study, the tin allele had a negligible effect on seedling growth but was associated with significantly (P<0.05) reduced tiller number (-37%), leaf area index (-26%), and spike number (-35%) to reduce plant biomass (-19%) at anthesis. Root biomass, root-to-shoot ratio at early stem elongation, and root depth at maturity were all increased in tin-containing NILs. Soil water use was slowed in tin-containing NILs, resulting in greater water availability, greater stomatal conductance, cooler canopy temperatures, and maintenance of green leaf area during grain-filling. Together these effects contributed to increases in harvest index and grain yield. In both the controlled and field environments, the tin gene was commonly associated with increased root length and biomass, but the significant influence of genetic background and environment suggests careful assessment of tin-containing progeny in selection for genotypic increases in root growth.Entities:
Keywords: Drought; phenotyping; root distribution; root length; root weight; tin; water use; wheat.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26494729 PMCID: PMC4682434 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Shoot and root growth for Banks (circles) and Kite (squares) tillering NILs (open symbol=+tin allele, shaded = biculm) assessed over multiple sampling dates in 2003 in (a) cool and (b) warm glasshouses. ‘B’ and ‘K’ denote statistical difference between the Banks and Kite tin and non-tin NILs, respectively, and ‘(B)’ indicates biculm and oligoculm tin-containing Banks NILs are statistically different at P=0.05.
Fig. 4.(a) Change in plant-available water in the soil (0–1.4 m) for two wheat Banks NILs (Banks– and Banks++) from the wettest profile around anthesis (7 October) until maturity (2 December) showing slower water use and higher soil water levels under Banks++, and (b) the profile of soil water on 21 October (point of maximum difference) for Banks– and Banks++. The solid lines in (b) show the drained upper limit and lower limit of water extraction, and the horizontal bars in both graphs are the SEM.
Selected shoot and root parameter means for Banks and Kite tiller inhibition NILs measured in cool and warm environments in 2003 and 2004
All environments were sampled at between 380 °Cd and 450 °Cd. Data are also given for Silverstar NILs sampled later at week 7 (585 °Cd and 570 °Cd for cool and warm environments, respectively).
| Environment | Entry | No. of leaves | Tillers per plant ( | Tiller leaf area (cm2) | Tiller biomass per plant (mg) | Mainstem leaf area (cm2) | Total leaf area (cm2) | Specific leaf area (cm2 g–1) | Total shoot weight (mg) | No. of seminals per plant ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 cool | Banks– | 4.2 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 69 | 46 | 48 | 439 | 217 | 4.7 |
| Banks+ | 4.3 | 0.3* | 0.1** | 2** | 48 | 48 | 391* | 191* | 5.0 | |
| Banks++ | 4.4 | 0.0* | 0.0** | 0** | 45 | 45 | 354** | 192* | 5.0 | |
| Kite– | 4.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 48 | 48 | 49 | 421 | 213 | 3.7 | |
| Kite+ | 4.2 | 0.4* | 0.3** | 13** | 61** | 61* | 409 | 228 | 3.3 | |
| Silverstar– | 5.9 | 5.3 | 115 | 588 | 127 | 242 | 356 | 1310 | 4.1 | |
| Silverstar+ | 6.2 | 1.7** | 32** | 118** | 124 | 156** | 310** | 768** | 4.9 | |
| 2003 warm | Banks– | 4.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 48 | 43 | 45 | 469 | 174 | 5.0 |
| Banks+ | 4.3 | 1.0* | 1.2* | 28* | 44 | 45 | 432* | 171 | 4.3* | |
| Banks++ | 4.3 | 0.0* | 0.0** | 0** | 49* | 49 | 362** | 175 | 5.0 | |
| Kite– | 4.6 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 67 | 53 | 56 | 431 | 239 | 4.3 | |
| Kite+ | 4.3 | 1.8 | 2.3* | 54 | 46* | 48* | 429 | 195** | 4.7 | |
| Silverstar– | 5.8 | 6.7 | 77 | 420 | 93 | 170 | 384 | 778 | 4.7 | |
| Silverstar+ | 6.0 | 2.7** | 84 | 483* | 114* | 198* | 332* | 1005** | 5.6 | |
| 2004 cool | Banks– | 4.1 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 73 | 33 | 34 | 374 | 200 | 5.3 |
| Banks+ | 4.4 | 1.0* | 0.2 | 71 | 37 | 37 | 328** | 237* | 5.3 | |
| Banks++ | 4.2 | 1.0* | 0.0* | 12** | 38 | 38 | 264** | 192 | 4.7* | |
| Kite– | 4.3 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 116 | 41 | 44* | 334 | 254 | 5.3 | |
| Kite+ | 4.2 | 2.0 | 1.9* | 81* | 49* | 51 | 293* | 325** | 4.8* | |
| 2004 warm | Banks– | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 28 | 42 | 43 | 491 | 129 | 4.3 |
| Banks+ | 3.9 | 0.5* | 0.2* | 6 | 44 | 44 | 461** | 137 | 4.3 | |
| Banks++ | 3.8 | 0.0* | 0.1** | 4 | 40 | 40* | 412** | 141 | 4.5 | |
| Kite– | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 24 | 50 | 51 | 435 | 159 | 4.3 | |
| Kite+ | 3.7 | 0.8* | 0.4 | 14 | 47 | 47* | 449 | 143* | 4.0 |
* and ** denote that restricted-tillering, tin NIL means are statistically different from non-tin, free-tillering sister NIL means at P=0.05 and 0.01, respectively. –, +, ++ refer to free tillering, oligoculm and biculm NILs, respectively.
Fig. 2.Root-to-shoot ratio at anthesis for three sets of lines including the free-tillering control, a detillering (‘detillered’) treatment and/or a near-isogenic (NIL) pair (B = Banks, K = Kite) containing the tin (‘+’) reduced-tillering gene and its non-tin (‘–‘) sister NIL. Standard error bars are given.
Fig. 3.Shoot and root growth for Banks (circlels) and Kite (squares) tillering NILs (open symbol=+tin allele except Banks where the shaded circle is biculm expression) assessed over multiple sampling dates in the field in 2004. ‘B’ and ‘K’ denote statistical difference between the Banks and Kite tin and non-tin NILs, respectively, at P=0.05.
Means for agronomic traits measured on Banks and Kite tillering NILs assessed during grain-filling and maturity in the field in 2004
| Entry | Plant height (cm) | Stomatal conductance | Canopy temperature depression | No. of spikes ( | Grain yield (t ha–1) | Total biomass (t ha–1) | Harvest index | No. of grains ( | Grains per ear ( | Kernel weight (mg) | Grain protein concentration (%) | Root depth (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks– | 100 | 0.13 | 0 | 608 | 5.91 | 14.5 | 0.41 | 22 692 | 38 | 26 | 11.8 | 117 |
| Banks+ | 97 | 0.29** | –0.41 | 328*** | 6.90** | 15.0 | 0.45** | 19 714* | 60*** | 35*** | 13.1** | 147** |
| Banks++ | 96 | 0.38*** | –1.40** | 237*** | 6.59** | 14.1 | 0.46*** | 18 333** | 79*** | 36*** | 14.5*** | 135* |
| Kite– | 102 | 0.14 | – | 536 | 6.22 | 15.9 | 0.39 | 18 353 | 34 | 34 | 14.5 | – |
| Kite+ | 103 | 0.16 | – | 447* | 6.19 | 16.3 | 0.38 | 14 420** | 33 | 43*** | 14.6 | – |
7–10 d post-flowering averaged at three times: 9:00, 12:00, and 15:00h.
Not sampled.
*, **, and *** denote that restricted-tillering, tin NIL means are statistically different from non-tin, free-tillering sister NIL means at P=0.10, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively. –, +, ++ refer to free tillering, oligoculm and biculm NILs, respectively.
Shoot and root characteristics for Banks and Kite tillering NILs at 58 DAS for field-assessed plants in 2004
| Entry | Shoot biomass (mg) | No. of tillers per plant ( | Total root biomass (mg) | Total root length (mm) | Branch root length (mm) | Seminal root length (mm) | No. of seminal roots ( | No. of nodal roots ( | Root: shoot ratio | Root proportion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks– | 60.6 | 2.5 | 15.6 | 1477 | 838 | 637 | 4.32 | 4.22 | 0.26 | 0.20 |
| Banks+ | 69.6 | 1.9* | 24.0** | 2053** | 1061** | 991** | 4.89** | 5.14** | 0.34* | 0.26* |
| Banks++ | 45.1** | 1.0** | 23.3** | 1903** | 965* | 939** | 4.83** | 5.09** | 0.52** | 0.34** |
| Kite– | 43.4 | 2.2 | 17.9 | 1353 | 681 | 673 | 4.65 | 4.00 | 0.41 | 0.29 |
| Kite+ | 56.0 | 2.0 | 28.5** | 2007** | 1079* | 929* | 5.11** | 4.44** | 0.51* | 0.34 |
Proportion of total plant biomass that is root biomass
* and ** denote that restricted-tillering, tin NIL means are statistically different from non-tin, free-tillering sister NIL means at P=0.05 and 0.01, respectively. –, +, ++ refer to free tillering, oligoculm and biculm NILs, respectively.
Leaf area index, light interception, biomass (including low density), and stem and leaf nitrogen concentration at anthesis for Banks and Kite tillering NILs assessed in the field in 2004
| Entry | Leaf area index (m2 m–2) | Light interception (%) | Anthesis biomass (normal density) (g m–2) | Anthesis biomass (low density) (g m–2) | Stem nitrogen concentration (%) | Leaf nitrogen concentration (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banks– | 4.22 | 92 | 888 | 979 | 0.65 | 2.70 |
| Banks+ | 2.92** | 85** | 809* | 649** | 0.66 | 3.08** |
| Banks++ | 2.11*** | 77*** | 576*** | 449*** | 0.81*** | 2.99* |
| Kite– | 5.94 | 94 | 1095 | 1129 | 0.68 | 2.59 |
| Kite+ | 5.49 | 93 | 919* | 869** | 0.59 | 2.65 |
*, **, and *** denote that restricted-tillering, tin NIL means are statistically different from non-tin, free-tillering sister NIL means at P=0.10, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively. –, +, ++ refer to free tillering, oligoculm and biculm NILs, respectively.