Literature DB >> 26494608

Self-assessed health, perceived stress and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study.

Line Flytkjær Jensen1, Anette Fischer Pedersen2, Berit Andersen3, Peter Vedsted2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Population-based cancer screening is offered in many countries to detect early stages of cancer and reduce mortality. Screening efficiency and equality is susceptible due to a group of non-participants. We investigated associations between self-assessed health, perceived stress and subsequent non-participation in breast cancer screening.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study included 4512 women who had participated in a Health Survey in 2006 and who were also the target group (aged 50-69 years) for the first organised breast cancer screening programme -3 years later in the Central Denmark Region in 2008-2009.
RESULTS: A U-shaped association was observed for physical health assessment as women with the highest (PR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.55), and the lowest (PR=1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.68) physical health scores were less likely to participate in the programme than women with physical health scores in the middle range. Women with low mental health assessment were more likely not to participate than women with mental health scores in the middle range (PR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.22-1.69). Higher non-participation propensity was also observed for women with the highest perceived stress scores (PR=1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.51) compared with women scoring in the middle range.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with highest and lowest self-assessed physical health, with lowest mental health or highest perceived stress were significantly more likely not to participate in breast cancer screening 2-3 years later than women who reported average health. Interventions targeting these groups may promote equal participation in future breast cancer screening programmes.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Denmark; Organised breast cancer screening; Perceived stress; SF12; Screening participation; Self-assessed health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26494608     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

1.  Impact of Risk-Stratified Therapy on Health Status in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Gregory T Armstrong; Paul C Nathan; Stephanie B Dixon; Yan Chen; Yutaka Yasui; Ching-Hon Pui; Stephen P Hunger; Lewis B Silverman; Kirsten K Ness; Daniel M Green; Rebecca M Howell; Wendy M Leisenring; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Kevin R Krull; Kevin C Oeffinger; Joseph P Neglia; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Non-participation in mammographic screening - experiences of women from a region in Sweden.

Authors:  Maria Norfjord van Zyl; Sharareh Akhavan; Per Tillgren; Margareta Asp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Does retirement affect secondary preventive care use? Evidence from breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter Eibich; Léontine Goldzahl
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Determinants of Non-Participation in Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lilu Ding; J Wang; M J W Greuter; M Goossens; Guido Van Hal; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Combined Effect of Health Status and Primary Care Use on Participation in Cancer Screening: The CONSTANCES Cohort.

Authors:  Thi-Van-Trinh Tran; Jeanna-Eve Franck; Mireille Cœuret-Pellicer; Laurent Rigal; Virginie Ringa; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-10-28

6.  Depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from UK Biobank.

Authors:  Claire L Niedzwiedz; Kathryn A Robb; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Jill P Pell; Daniel J Smith
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Changes in cancer preventive behaviours, screening and diagnosis during COVID-19.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Christine Paul; Caitlin Horsham
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.955

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.