Literature DB >> 26494424

Prognostic factors of regression and relapse of complex atypical hyperplasia and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma with conservative treatment.

Yu-Feng Yang1, Ying-Yang Liao2, Xian-Lian Liu3, Shu-Guang Su4, Lin-Zhu Li5, Ning-Fu Peng6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate possible prognostic factors regarding regression and relapse of complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) and well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (WDC) treated with conservative treatment.
METHODS: The retrospective study reviewed clinicopathologic, treatment, regression and relapse data from patients diagnosed with CAH or WDC who were treated with conservative treatment at 4 institutions. Potential factor evaluation was performed. SPSS 16 was used for statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included (51 had WDC, and 37 had CAH). Regression was evaluated in 88 patients, with a median follow-up of 61 (range 15-95) months. Seventy-seven (87.5%) patients regressed, and 11 (12.5%) had persistent or progressive disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no factors associated with regression. Relapse was evaluated in 71 patients, with median follow-up of 54 (range 8-86) months. Twenty-five/71 (35.2%) patients experienced relapse. On univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI) 30 or higher (p=0.001), WCD at initial biopsy (p=0.017) and positive expression of post-treatment ki67 (p=0.033) were associated to a higher relapse probability. However, only BMI 30 or higher was significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.012). The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a higher relapse probability in the patients with BMI 30 or higher (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Obesity seems to be a risk factor for relapse of CAH or WDC with conservative treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex atypical hyperplasia; Conservative treatments; Endometrioid carcinoma; Regression; Relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26494424     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  9 in total

1.  Fertility outcomes in infertile women with complex hyperplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia who received progestin therapy and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Miao Li; Jia-Lun Song; Ying Zhao; She-Ling Wu; Hong-Bin Liu; Rong Tang; Lei Yan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Polycystic Ovarian Morphology may be a Positive Prognostic Factor in Patients with Endometrial Cancer who Achieved Complete Remission after Fertility-Sparing Therapy with Progestin

Authors:  Yamato Fukui; Ayumi Taguchi; Katsuyuki Adachi; Marie Sato; Akira Kawata; Michihiro Tanikawa; Kenbun Sone; Mayuyo Mori; Kazunori Nagasaka; Yoko Matsumoto; Takahide Arimoto; Katsutoshi Oda; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11-26

3.  Insulin resistance and overweight prolonged fertility-sparing treatment duration in endometrial atypical hyperplasia patients.

Authors:  Bingyi Yang; Liying Xie; Hongwei Zhang; Qin Zhu; Yan Du; Xuezhen Luo; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 4.  Efficacy of the LNG-IUS for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia and early stage endometrial cancer: Can biomarkers predict response?

Authors:  Molly Dore; Sara Filoche; Kirsty Danielson; Claire Henry
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-19

5.  Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Syndrome Increase the Risk of Relapse For Fertility Preserving Treatment in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xingchen Li; Yuan Fan; Jiaqi Wang; Rong Zhou; Li Tian; Yiqin Wang; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Hysteroscopic Curettage Followed by Megestrol Acetate Plus Metformin as a Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia or Well-Differentiated Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chu-Yu Jing; Sheng-Nan Li; Bo-Er Shan; Wei Zhang; Wen-Juan Tian; Yu-Lan Ren; Hua-Ying Wang
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 7.  Fertility-Sparing Approach in Patients with Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer Grade 2 Stage IA (FIGO): A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pierluigi Giampaolino; Valeria Cafasso; Dominga Boccia; Mario Ascione; Antonio Mercorio; Francesco Viciglione; Mario Palumbo; Paolo Serafino; Cira Buonfantino; Maria Chiara De Angelis; Paolo Verrazzo; Giovanna Grasso; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Bifulco; Luigi Della Corte
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Significance of serum and pathological biomarkers in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yiqin Wang; Rong Zhou; Xiaobo Zhang; Huixin Liu; Danhua Shen; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 9.  Fertility issue in early stage endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Hasan Onur Topçu; Cihan Kaya; Engin Oral
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.