Literature DB >> 2649399

Evaluation of routine ultrasound examination for the prenatal diagnosis of malformation.

F Lys1, P De Wals, I Borlee-Grimee, A Billiet, M Vincotte-Mols, S Levi.   

Abstract

In 1986, a retrospective survey was undertaken in the southern part of the province of Hainaut, Belgium, in order to measure the frequency of ultrasound examinations during pregnancy and to evaluate the effectiveness of the routine practice of echography screening for the detection of congenital malformations in an unselected population. The reference populations comprised 8316 pregnancies covered by the EUROCAT Registry of Hainaut. In 1986, 190 congenital malformations cases were registered. For each of the 190 cases, one control ending in the birth of a non-malformed infant was retrospectively selected. The analysis showed that an average of four ultrasound examinations were performed during pregnancy. When all malformations are considered, the sensitivity of the screening is 14% (27/190). Sensitivity of detection varied from 100% for gross malformations such as anencephaly to 0% for defects of a minor size such as facial clefts. In these 27 cases, obstetrical interventions following prenatal diagnosis were termination of pregnancy in 14 cases and induction of labor in 3 cases. Antenatal care was planned in 8 cases, 5 of which had early surgical repair. In the control group, a malformation was suspected in 3 of the 144 pregnancies (specificity of detection, 98%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2649399     DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(89)90055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  8 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence based role of US in evaluating the fetus?

Authors:  Dorothy I Bulas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

2.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital gastro-intestinal atresias.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The role of routine post-natal abdominal ultrasound for newborns in a resource-poor setting: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Atinuke M Agunloye; Adejumoke I Ayede; Samuel I Omokhodion
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 4.  Fetal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Garmel; M E D'Alton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

5.  Evaluation of routine prenatal ultrasound examination in detecting fetal chromosomal abnormalities in a low risk population.

Authors:  C Stoll; B Dott; Y Alembik; M P Roth
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Prenatal detection of internal urinary system's anomalies. A registry-based study.

Authors:  C Stoll; Y Alembik; B Dott; M P Roth
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  T Todros; E Capuzzo; P Gaglioti
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2001-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.