| Literature DB >> 26493953 |
Clare M Reynolds1, Stephanie A Segovia2, Xiaoyuan D Zhang2, Clint Gray2, Mark H Vickers2.
Abstract
Consumption of a high-fat (HF) diet during pregnancy and lactation influences later life predisposition to obesity and cardiometabolic disease in offspring. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain poorly defined, but one potential target that has received scant attention and is likely pivotal to disease progression is that of the gut. The present study examined the effects of maternal supplementation with the anti-inflammatory lipid, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), on offspring metabolic profile and gut expression of taste receptors and inflammatory markers. We speculate that preventing high-fat diet-induced metainflammation improved maternal metabolic parameters conferring beneficial effects on adult offspring. Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a purified control diet (CD; 10% kcal from fat), CD with CLA (CLA; 10% kcal from fat, 1% CLA), HF (45% kcal from fat) or HF with CLA (HFCLA; 45% kcal from fat, 1% CLA) throughout gestation and lactation. Plasma/tissues were taken at day 24 and RT-PCR was carried out on gut sections. Offspring from HF mothers were significantly heavier at weaning with impaired insulin sensitivity compared to controls. This was associated with increased plasma IL-1β and TNFα concentrations. Gut Tas1R1, IL-1β, TNFα, and NLRP3 expression was increased and Tas1R3 expression was decreased in male offspring from HF mothers and was normalized by maternal CLA supplementation. Tas1R1 expression was increased while PYY and IL-10 decreased in female offspring of HF mothers. These results suggest that maternal consumption of a HF diet during critical developmental windows influences offspring predisposition to obesity and metabolic dysregulation. This may be associated with dysregulation of taste receptor, incretin, and inflammatory gene expression in the gut.Entities:
Keywords: Developmental programing; gut hormones; inflammation; maternal high fat; taste receptors
Year: 2015 PMID: 26493953 PMCID: PMC4632957 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Composition of experimental diets
| CD | CLA | HF | HFCLA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| %gm | %kcal | %gm | %kcal | %gm | %kcal | %gm | %kcal | |
| Macronutrient | ||||||||
| Protein | 19 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 24 | 20 | 24 | 20 |
| Carbohydrate | 67 | 70 | 67 | 70 | 41 | 35 | 41 | 35 |
| Fat | 4 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 45 | 24 | 45 |
| kcal/g | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.7 | ||||
| Fat composition | ||||||||
| Lard | 20 | 180 | 19.55 | 176 | 177.5 | 1598 | 175.5 | 1579 |
| Soybean oil | 25 | 225 | 25 | 225 | 25 | 255 | 25 | 255 |
| CLA | 0 | 0 | 0.45 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 |
Predesigned probe information
| Probe name | ID |
|---|---|
| Tas1R1 | Rn01516038_m1 |
| Tas1R3 | Rn00590759_g1 |
| IL-1 | Rn00580432_m1 |
| TNF | Rn01525859_g1 |
| NLRP3 | Rn04244620_m1 |
| IL-10 | Rn01483988_g1 |
| PYY | Rn01460420_g1 |
| Ghrelin | Rn00572319_m1 |
| Cyclophilin A | Rn00690933_m1 |
| HPRT1 | Rn01527840_m1 |
Weanling physiological data
| CD | CLA | HF | HFCLA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MALE | ||||
| Weight (g) | 45.88 ± 2.4 | 44.33 ± 3.3 | 56.62 ± 2.7 | 48.64 ± 3.2 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 5.9 ± 0.7 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.23 | 0.19 ± 0.01 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.003 |
| IL-1 | 24.3 ± 2.1 | 27.98 ± 1.3 | 33.77 ± 1.8 | 29.6 ± 1.8 |
| TNF | 8.3 ± 1.5 | 11.8 ± 2.5 | 11.4 ± 2.4 | 10.1 ± 2.1 |
| FEMALE | ||||
| Weight (g) | 44.4 ± 1.1 | 45.6 ± 4.8 | 58.0 ± 5.0 | 47.6 ± 2.8 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.3 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.51 ± 0.19 | 0.54 ± 0.1 | 1.30 ± 0.38 | 0.29 ± 0.11 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.10 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| IL-1 | 28.01 ± 2.8 | 29.86 ± 3.2 | 29.3 ± 4.6 | 28.2 ± 3.7 |
| TNF | 14.8 ± 1.9 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 8.1 ± 0.9 |
Data are presented as means ± SEM. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with maternal HF diet and maternal CLA supplementation as factors. Holm–Sidak post hoc tests were performed where indicated to detect further differences between groups.
P < 0.05 with respect to CD
P < 0.05 with respect to HF
P < 0.05 indicates an overall HF effect
P < 0.05 indicates an overall CLA effect
P<0.05 indicates an interaction (HF*CLA). HOMA-IR was calculated as: fasting glucose × fasting insulin/22.5.
Figure 1Gut taste receptor expression in offspring at P24. Gut mRNA expression of (A) Tas1R1 and (B) Tas1R3. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 with respect to CD; n = 5–6 males; n = 5–6 females from independent litters.
Figure 2Gut hormone gene expression in offspring at P24. Gut mRNA expression of (A) ghrelin and (B) PYY. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 with respect to CD; +P < 0.05 with respect to HF; n = 5–6 males; n = 5–6 females from independent litters.
Figure 3Expression of gut inflammatory markers in offspring at P24. Gut mRNA expression of (A) IL-1β, (B) TNFα, (C) NLRP3 and (D) IL-10. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 with respect to CD; +P < 0.05 with respect to HF; n = 5–6 males; n = 5–6 females from independent litters.