Literature DB >> 26493663

Very Late Scaffold Thrombosis: Intracoronary Imaging and Histopathological and Spectroscopic Findings.

Lorenz Räber1, Salvatore Brugaletta2, Kyohei Yamaji1, Crochan J O'Sullivan3, Shuji Otsuki2, Tobias Koppara4, Masanori Taniwaki1, Yoshinobu Onuma5, Xavier Freixa2, Franz R Eberli3, Patrick W Serruys6, Michael Joner4, Manel Sabaté2, Stephan Windecker7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds provide transient lumen support followed by complete resorption.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether very late scaffold thrombosis (VLScT) occurs when resorption is presumed to be nearly complete.
METHODS: Patients with VLScT at 3 tertiary care centers underwent thrombus aspiration followed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Thrombus aspirates were analyzed by histopathological and spectroscopic examination.
RESULTS: Between March 2014 and February 2015, 4 patients presented with VLScT at 44 (case 1), 19 (cases 2 and 4), and 21 (case 3) months, respectively, after implantation of an Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold 1.1 (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois). At the time of VLScT, all patients were taking low-dose aspirin, and 2 patients were also taking prasugrel. OCT showed malapposed scaffold struts surrounded by thrombus in 7.1%, 9.0%, and 8.9% of struts in cases 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Scaffold discontinuity with struts in the lumen center was the cause of malapposition in cases 2 and 4. Uncovered scaffold struts with superimposed thrombus were the predominant findings in case 3. OCT percent area stenosis at the time of VLScT was high in case 1 (74.8%) and case 2 (70.9%) without evidence of excessive neointimal hyperplasia. Spectroscopic thrombus aspirate analysis showed persistence of intracoronary polymer fragments in case 1.
CONCLUSIONS: VLScT may occur at advanced stages of scaffold resorption. Potential mechanisms specific for VLScT include scaffold discontinuity and restenosis during the resorption process, which appear delayed in humans; these findings suggest an extended period of vulnerability for thrombotic events.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioresorbable scaffold; coronary artery disease; optical coherence tomography; thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26493663     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  30 in total

Review 1.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ashwin Nathan; Taisei Kobayashi; Daniel M Kolansky; Robert L Wilensky; Jay Giri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Use of a bioresorbable novolimus eluting vascular scaffold fails a hybrid PCI strategy with drug eluting stent.

Authors:  Vera S Schneider; Carsten Skurk; Matthias Riedel; Youssef S Abdelwahed; Ulf Landmesser; David M Leistner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  New insight to estimate under-expansion after stent implantation on bifurcation lesions using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakamura; Guilherme F Attizzani; Setsu Nishino; Kentaro Tanaka; Mohamad Soud; Gabriel T Pereira; Milana Leygerman; Anas Fares; Audrey Schnell; Marco A Costa; Andrejs Erglis; Hiram G Bezerra
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: balloons, stents and scaffolds.

Authors:  Roisin Colleran; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Very late bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis at 25 months post implantation.

Authors:  Koo Hui Chan; Swee-Chong Seow; Huay Cheem Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 6.  Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: Deployment Tips and Tricks and the Future of the Technology.

Authors:  J Ribamar Costa; Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  BRS implantation in long lesions requiring device overlapping: myth or reality?

Authors:  Simone Biscaglia; Andrea Erriquez; Davide Bernucci; Giulia Bugani; Enrico Favaretto; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Bioresorbable stents: quo vantis?

Authors:  Nicholas G Kounis; Ioanna Koniari; Periklis Davlouros; George Soufras; Grigorios Tsigkas; George Hahalis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Stenosis: When and How Based Upon Current Studies.

Authors:  Alexandre Abizaid; J Ribamar Costa
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Magmaris: a new generation metallic sirolimus-eluting fully bioresorbable scaffold: present status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio Rapetto; Massimo Leoncini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.