Literature DB >> 2649358

A rational approach to anaesthetic premedication.

C C Alpert1, J D Baker, J E Cooke.   

Abstract

Rational use of premedication for anaesthesia must always be modified and updated to keep pace with the evolving fields of anaesthesiology and surgery, as well as to meet changing patient needs and preferences. It is no longer axiomatic that all patients require, and therefore should receive, premedication. Unfortunately, a variety of traditional reasons have been proposed to justify routine premedication in many institutions. Smoothing induction, decreasing reflexes and arrhythmias, decreasing nausea and vomiting, decreasing pain, decreasing secretions, and producing sedation and amnesia have all been claimed historically as beneficial results of premedication. Modern anaesthetic agents and techniques have come a long way towards eliminating the routine need for premedication. In the preoperative period, the goal of an anxiety-free patient who is physiologically uncompromised requires an individualised approach based on experience and an adequate knowledge of current pharmacology. As our knowledge of potential problems associated with anaesthesia has expanded, we have added other classes of drugs such as the H2-histamine receptor blockers and antacids to our premedicant armamentarium. Outpatient and short-stay patients have further challenged our preoperative goal of an anxiety-free patient by requiring individuals to be 'street ready' within a brief period of time after surgery. Even for in-house elective procedures, not every patient is a candidate for routine premedication. A frank preoperative discussion is all that is necessary to effectively allay anxiety in many persons. In these and other special situations, this article will hopefully guide the reader toward a more rational approach to premedicating patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2649358     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198937020-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  56 in total

1.  Intramuscular lorazepam versus pentobarbital premedication: a comparison of patient sedation, anxiolysis, and recall.

Authors:  M I Aleniewski; B J Bulas; L Maderazo; C Mendoza
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Patient refusal of surgery following Innovar premedication.

Authors:  C M Lee; A E Yeakel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1975 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Volume and pH of gastric contents following anticholinergic premedication.

Authors:  R K Mirakhur; J Reid; J Elliott
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 4.  Benzodiazepines as oral premedicants.

Authors:  J Kanto
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  Ranitidine: a new H2-receptor antagonist.

Authors:  J B Zeldis; L S Friedman; K J Isselbacher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of i.v. glycopyrrolate and atropine in the prevention of bradycardia and arrhythmias following repeated doses of suxamethonium in children.

Authors:  D W Green; A S Bristow; M Fisher
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of diazepam.

Authors:  M Mandelli; G Tognoni; S Garattini
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Comparison of i.v. diazepam and hydroxyzine as surgical premedicants.

Authors:  R H Wender; J T Conner; J W Bellville; D Schehl; F Dorey; R L Katz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Pre-anaesthetic medication in paediatric day-care surgery.

Authors:  R Desjardins; S Ansara; J Charest
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1981-03

10.  Drug-induced mood changes in man. I. Observations on healthy subjects, chronically ill patients, and postaddicts.

Authors:  L LASAGNA; J M VON FELSINGER; H K BEECHER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1955-03-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of pantoprazole and its interactions with vecuronium on the neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  Tejas K Patel; Parvati B Patel; C B Tripathi
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.200

2.  Preanaesthetic medication: a survey of current usage.

Authors:  R K Mirakhur
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 18.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.