| Literature DB >> 2649358 |
C C Alpert1, J D Baker, J E Cooke.
Abstract
Rational use of premedication for anaesthesia must always be modified and updated to keep pace with the evolving fields of anaesthesiology and surgery, as well as to meet changing patient needs and preferences. It is no longer axiomatic that all patients require, and therefore should receive, premedication. Unfortunately, a variety of traditional reasons have been proposed to justify routine premedication in many institutions. Smoothing induction, decreasing reflexes and arrhythmias, decreasing nausea and vomiting, decreasing pain, decreasing secretions, and producing sedation and amnesia have all been claimed historically as beneficial results of premedication. Modern anaesthetic agents and techniques have come a long way towards eliminating the routine need for premedication. In the preoperative period, the goal of an anxiety-free patient who is physiologically uncompromised requires an individualised approach based on experience and an adequate knowledge of current pharmacology. As our knowledge of potential problems associated with anaesthesia has expanded, we have added other classes of drugs such as the H2-histamine receptor blockers and antacids to our premedicant armamentarium. Outpatient and short-stay patients have further challenged our preoperative goal of an anxiety-free patient by requiring individuals to be 'street ready' within a brief period of time after surgery. Even for in-house elective procedures, not every patient is a candidate for routine premedication. A frank preoperative discussion is all that is necessary to effectively allay anxiety in many persons. In these and other special situations, this article will hopefully guide the reader toward a more rational approach to premedicating patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2649358 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198937020-00009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drugs ISSN: 0012-6667 Impact factor: 9.546