Luca Donazzan1,2, Felix Mahfoud1, Sebastian Ewen1, Christian Ukena1, Bodo Cremers1, Carl-Martin Kirsch3, Dirk Hellwig3,4, Tareq Eweiwi3, Samer Ezziddin3, Murray Esler5, Michael Böhm6. 1. Klinik für Innere Medizin III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 1, Geb. 40., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 2. Interdisciplinary Medical Research Center South Tyrol (IMREST), Bolzano, Italy. 3. Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 4. Abteilung für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 5. Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Klinik für Innere Medizin III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str. 1, Geb. 40., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. michael.boehm@uniklinikum-saarland.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate, whether renal denervation (RDN) has a direct effect on cardiac sympathetic activity and innervation density. BACKGROUND: RDN demonstrated its efficacy not only in reducing blood pressure (BP) in certain patients, but also in decreasing cardiac hypertrophy and arrhythmias. These pleiotropic effects occur partly independent from the observed BP reduction. METHODS: Eleven patients with resistant hypertension (mean office systolic BP 180 ± 18 mmHg, mean antihypertensive medications 6.0 ± 1.5) underwent I-123-mIBG scintigraphy to exclude pheochromocytoma. We measured cardiac sympathetic innervation and activity before and 9 months after RDN. Cardiac sympathetic innervation was assessed by heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M) and sympathetic activity by wash out ratio (WOR). Effects on office BP, 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring, were documented. RESULTS: Office systolic BP and mean ambulatory systolic BP were significantly reduced from 180 to 141 mmHg (p = 0.006) and from 149 to 129 mmHg (p = 0.014), respectively. Cardiac innervation remained unchanged before and after RDN (H/M 2.5 ± 0.5 versus 2.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.285). Cardiac sympathetic activity was significantly reduced by 67 % (WOR decreased from 24.1 ± 12.7 to 7.9 ± 25.3 %, p = 0.047). Both, responders and non-responders experienced a reduction of cardiac sympathetic activity. CONCLUSION: RDN significantly reduced cardiac sympathetic activity thereby demonstrating a direct effect on the heart. These changes occurred independently from BP effects and provide a pathophysiological basis for studies, investigating the potential effect of RDN on arrhythmias and heart failure.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate, whether renal denervation (RDN) has a direct effect on cardiac sympathetic activity and innervation density. BACKGROUND: RDN demonstrated its efficacy not only in reducing blood pressure (BP) in certain patients, but also in decreasing cardiac hypertrophy and arrhythmias. These pleiotropic effects occur partly independent from the observed BP reduction. METHODS: Eleven patients with resistant hypertension (mean office systolic BP 180 ± 18 mmHg, mean antihypertensive medications 6.0 ± 1.5) underwent I-123-mIBG scintigraphy to exclude pheochromocytoma. We measured cardiac sympathetic innervation and activity before and 9 months after RDN. Cardiac sympathetic innervation was assessed by heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M) and sympathetic activity by wash out ratio (WOR). Effects on office BP, 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring, were documented. RESULTS: Office systolic BP and mean ambulatory systolic BP were significantly reduced from 180 to 141 mmHg (p = 0.006) and from 149 to 129 mmHg (p = 0.014), respectively. Cardiac innervation remained unchanged before and after RDN (H/M 2.5 ± 0.5 versus 2.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.285). Cardiac sympathetic activity was significantly reduced by 67 % (WOR decreased from 24.1 ± 12.7 to 7.9 ± 25.3 %, p = 0.047). Both, responders and non-responders experienced a reduction of cardiac sympathetic activity. CONCLUSION: RDN significantly reduced cardiac sympathetic activity thereby demonstrating a direct effect on the heart. These changes occurred independently from BP effects and provide a pathophysiological basis for studies, investigating the potential effect of RDN on arrhythmias and heart failure.
Authors: Dominik Linz; Arne van Hunnik; Christian Ukena; Sebastian Ewen; Felix Mahfoud; Stephan H Schirmer; Matthias Lenski; Hans-Ruprecht Neuberger; Ulrich Schotten; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Stephan H Schirmer; Marwa M Y A Sayed; Jan-Christian Reil; Daniel Lavall; Christian Ukena; Dominik Linz; Felix Mahfoud; Michael Böhm Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: H Ogita; T Shimonagata; M Fukunami; K Kumagai; T Yamada; Y Asano; A Hirata; M Asai; H Kusuoka; M Hori; N Hoki Journal: Heart Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Dagmara Hering; Petra Marusic; Antony S Walton; Elisabeth A Lambert; Henry Krum; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Gavin W Lambert; Murray D Esler; Markus P Schlaich Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Benjamin F Remo; Mark Preminger; Jason Bradfield; Suneet Mittal; Noel Boyle; Anuj Gupta; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Jonathan S Steinberg; Timm Dickfeld Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Luciana V Armaganijan; Rodolfo Staico; Dalmo A R Moreira; Renato D Lopes; Paulo T J Medeiros; Ricardo Habib; Jônatas Melo Neto; Marcelo Katz; Dikran Armaganijan; Amanda G M R Sousa; Felix Mahfoud; Alexandre Abizaid Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Roland E Schmieder; Karin Högerl; Susanne Jung; Peter Bramlage; Roland Veelken; Christian Ott Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Dominik Linz; Mathias Hohl; Adrian D Elliott; Dennis H Lau; Felix Mahfoud; Murray D Esler; Prashanthan Sanders; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 4.435
Authors: Martin Steinmetz; Dominik Nelles; Jutta Weisser-Thomas; Christian Schaefer; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Karl Fengler; Diana Heinemann; Thomas Okon; Karoline Röhnert; Thomas Stiermaier; Maximilian von Röder; Christian Besler; Ulrike Müller; Robert Höllriegel; Gerhard Schuler; Steffen Desch; Philipp Lurz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Christian Ukena; Felix Mahfoud; Sebastian Ewen; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Boris A Hoffmann; Dominik Linz; Dan Musat; Valerie Pavlicek; Eberhard Scholz; Dierk Thomas; Stephan Willems; Michael Böhm; Jonathan S Steinberg Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 5.460