Literature DB >> 26493295

The phylogenetic structure of plant-pollinator networks increases with habitat size and isolation.

Marcelo A Aizen1, Gabriela Gleiser1, Malena Sabatino2, Luis J Gilarranz3, Jordi Bascompte4, Miguel Verdú5.   

Abstract

Similarity among species in traits related to ecological interactions is frequently associated with common ancestry. Thus, closely related species usually interact with ecologically similar partners, which can be reinforced by diverse co-evolutionary processes. The effect of habitat fragmentation on the phylogenetic signal in interspecific interactions and correspondence between plant and animal phylogenies is, however, unknown. Here, we address to what extent phylogenetic signal and co-phylogenetic congruence of plant-animal interactions depend on habitat size and isolation by analysing the phylogenetic structure of 12 pollination webs from isolated Pampean hills. Phylogenetic signal in interspecific interactions differed among webs, being stronger for flower-visiting insects than plants. Phylogenetic signal and overall co-phylogenetic congruence increased independently with hill size and isolation. We propose that habitat fragmentation would erode the phylogenetic structure of interaction webs. A decrease in phylogenetic signal and co-phylogenetic correspondence in plant-pollinator interactions could be associated with less reliable mutualism and erratic co-evolutionary change.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Area effect; Pampas; co-phylogenetic correspondence; habitat islands; isolation; mutualistic networks; phylogenetic structure; pollination webs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26493295     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  8 in total

1.  Annual precipitation predicts the phylogenetic signal in bat-fruit interaction networks across the Neotropics.

Authors:  Erick J Corro; Fabricio Villalobos; Andrés Lira-Noriega; Roger Guevara; Paulo R Guimarães; Wesley Dáttilo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  DNA metabarcoding data unveils invisible pollination networks.

Authors:  André Pornon; Christophe Andalo; Monique Burrus; Nathalie Escaravage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Recent advances in metacommunities and meta-ecosystem theories.

Authors:  Frédéric Guichard
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  Disentangling the role of floral sensory stimuli in pollination networks.

Authors:  Aphrodite Kantsa; Robert A Raguso; Adrian G Dyer; Jens M Olesen; Thomas Tscheulin; Theodora Petanidou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Defaunation precipitates the extinction of evolutionarily distinct interactions in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Carine Emer; Mauro Galetti; Marco A Pizo; Pedro Jordano; Miguel Verdú
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 6.  Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination.

Authors:  Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki; Anahí Espíndola; Adam J Vanbergen; Josef Settele; Claire Kremen; Lynn V Dicks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Phylogenetic structure of specialization: A new approach that integrates partner availability and phylogenetic diversity to quantify biotic specialization in ecological networks.

Authors:  Carlos J Pardo-De la Hoz; Ian D Medeiros; Jean P Gibert; Pierre-Luc Chagnon; Nicolas Magain; Jolanta Miadlikowska; François Lutzoni
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Specialization in plant-pollinator networks: insights from local-scale interactions in Glenbow Ranch Provincial Park in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Soraya Villalobos; José Manuel Sevenello-Montagner; Jana C Vamosi
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.964

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.