Literature DB >> 26493195

Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.

Ralf Felix Trauzeddel1,2, Ulrike Löbe3, Alex J Barker4,5, Carmen Gelsinger3, Christian Butter3, Michael Markl4,5, Jeanette Schulz-Menger1,2, Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff6,7.   

Abstract

Ascending aortic blood flow characteristics are altered after aortic valve surgery, but the effect of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. Abnormal flow may be associated with aortic and cardiac remodeling. We analyzed blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after TAVI in comparison to conventional stented aortic bioprostheses (AVR) and healthy subjects using time-resolved three-dimensional flow-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow MRI). Seventeen patients with TAVI (Edwards Sapien XT), 12 with AVR and 9 healthy controls underwent 4D-flow MRI of the ascending aorta. Target parameters were: severity of vortical and helical flow pattern (semiquantitative grading from 0 = none to 3 = severe) and the local distribution of systolic wall shear stress (WSSsystole). AVR revealed significantly more extensive vortical and helical flow pattern than TAVI (p = 0.042 and p = 0.002) and controls (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). TAVI showed significantly more extensive vortical flow than controls (p < 0.001). Both TAVI and AVR revealed marked blood flow eccentricity (64.7 and 66.7%, respectively), whereas controls showed central blood flow (88.9%). TAVI and AVR exhibited an asymmetric distribution of WSSsystole in the mid-ascending aorta with local maxima at the right anterior aortic wall and local minima at the left posterior wall. In contrast, controls showed a symmetric distribution of WSSsystole along the aortic circumference. Blood flow was significantly altered in the ascending aorta after TAVI and AVR. Changes were similar regarding WSSsystole distribution, while TAVI resulted in less helical and vortical blood flow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D-flow; Aorta; Aortic valve replacement; Magnetic resonance imaging; Shear stress; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26493195      PMCID: PMC4886550          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0792-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Ciro Bancone; Carlo A Conti; Emiliano Votta; Alberto Redaelli; Luca Del Viscovo; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow.

Authors:  Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Krishna Bandi; Julio Garcia; Mazen Albaghdadi; Patrick McCarthy; Robert O Bonow; James Carr; Jeremy Collins; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Jarrett Wrenn; Monica Sigovan; Elyse Foster; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description.

Authors:  Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Assaf Bash; Nicolas Borenstein; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Genevieve Derumeaux; Frederic Anselme; François Laborde; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Aortic dilatation in patients with prosthetic aortic valve: comparison of MRI and echocardiography.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; André Rudolph; Ralf Wassmuth; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2010-05

8.  Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Ralf F Trauzeddel; Alex J Barker; Henriette Gruettner; Michael Markl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Michael D Hope; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01

10.  Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  14 in total

1.  Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?

Authors:  Pavlo Yevtushenko; Florian Hellmeier; Jan Bruening; Sarah Nordmeyer; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Leonid Goubergrits
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses.

Authors:  Daniel Giese; Kilian Weiss; Bettina Baeßler; Navid Madershahian; Yeong-Hoon Choi; David Maintz; Alexander C Bunck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Evolving treatment options for valve and aortic disease with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of severe aortic stenosis and in post-procedural evaluation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Perioperative evaluation of regional aortic wall shear stress patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and/or proximal thoracic aortic replacement.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Paul W M Fedak; Pim van Ooij; Ozair Rahman; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Transcatheter Heart Valve Downstream Fluid Dynamics in an Accelerated Evaluation Environment.

Authors:  Sailahari V Ponnaluri; Steven Deutsch; Michael S Sacks; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Late subclinical hemolysis and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with On-X mechanical prostheses - a preliminary single-center report.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Perek; Sylwia Sławek; Agnieszka Malińska; Izabela Katyńska; Mateusz Puślecki; Bogumiła Szymak-Pawełczyk; Michał Nowicki; Marek Jemielity
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-09-30

8.  Influence of the tilt angle of Percutaneous Aortic Prosthesis on Velocity and Shear Stress Fields

Authors:  Bruno Alvares de Azevedo Gomes; Gabriel Cordeiro Camargo; Jorge Roberto Lopes Dos Santos; Luis Fernando Alzuguir Azevedo; Ângela Ourivio Nieckele; Aristarco Gonçalves Siqueira-Filho; Glaucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Blood flow dynamics with four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with aortic stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hirokazu Komoriyama; Kiwamu Kamiya; Toshiyuki Nagai; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Satonori Tsuneta; Yuta Kobayashi; Yoshiya Kato; Miwa Sarashina; Kazunori Omote; Takao Konishi; Takuma Sato; Shingo Tsujinaga; Hiroyuki Iwano; Yasushige Shingu; Satoru Wakasa; Toshihisa Anzai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  M Kelm; L Goubergrits; J Bruening; P Yevtushenko; J F Fernandes; S H Sündermann; F Berger; V Falk; T Kuehne; S Nordmeyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.