V Provitera1, C H Gibbons2, G Wendelschafer-Crabb3, V Donadio4, D F Vitale1, A Stancanelli1, G Caporaso1, R Liguori4, N Wang2, L Santoro5, W R Kennedy3, M Nolano1. 1. 'S. Maugeri' Foundation IRCCS, Telese Terme, Benevento, Italy. 2. Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy. 5. Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University 'Federico II' of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantification of intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENFs) in skin biopsies is now the tool of choice to diagnose small fiber neuropathies. An adequate normative dataset, necessary to assess normality cutoffs, is available for brightfield microscopy but not for immunofluorescence. METHODS: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density data in distal leg skin samples processed with immunofluorescence were collected from 528 healthy individuals from four experienced laboratories worldwide. In all laboratories skin samples were collected, processed and analyzed according to standard procedures. Quantile regression analysis was employed to tailor the fit of the 5° percentile as the normal cutoff value and to test and measure the effect of age, gender, body mass index, race, biopsy site (lateral distal lower leg or medial posterior mid-calf) and participating laboratory as possible influential variables. RESULTS: Age, gender and biopsy site showed an independent linear correlation with IENF density. For each decade the 5° quantile IENF cutoff showed a 0.54 fibers/mm decrease, whilst females exhibited a 1.0 fiber/mm cutoff greater than males. Compared to the lateral distal lower leg, biopsies from the calf showed a 3.4 fibers/mm lower 5° percentile cutoff, documenting a variation linked by site. CONCLUSIONS: An age- and gender-adjusted normative dataset for IENF density at the lateral distal lower leg obtained with indirect immunofluorescence is presented for the first time by sharing data from four experienced laboratories worldwide. This dataset can be used as reference for laboratories processing skin biopsies with this technique.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantification of intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENFs) in skin biopsies is now the tool of choice to diagnose small fiber neuropathies. An adequate normative dataset, necessary to assess normality cutoffs, is available for brightfield microscopy but not for immunofluorescence. METHODS: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density data in distal leg skin samples processed with immunofluorescence were collected from 528 healthy individuals from four experienced laboratories worldwide. In all laboratories skin samples were collected, processed and analyzed according to standard procedures. Quantile regression analysis was employed to tailor the fit of the 5° percentile as the normal cutoff value and to test and measure the effect of age, gender, body mass index, race, biopsy site (lateral distal lower leg or medial posterior mid-calf) and participating laboratory as possible influential variables. RESULTS: Age, gender and biopsy site showed an independent linear correlation with IENF density. For each decade the 5° quantile IENF cutoff showed a 0.54 fibers/mm decrease, whilst females exhibited a 1.0 fiber/mm cutoff greater than males. Compared to the lateral distal lower leg, biopsies from the calf showed a 3.4 fibers/mm lower 5° percentile cutoff, documenting a variation linked by site. CONCLUSIONS: An age- and gender-adjusted normative dataset for IENF density at the lateral distal lower leg obtained with indirect immunofluorescence is presented for the first time by sharing data from four experienced laboratories worldwide. This dataset can be used as reference for laboratories processing skin biopsies with this technique.
Authors: Molly G Abbott; Zahra Allawi; Monika Hofer; Olaf Ansorge; Stefen Brady; Ricardo Fadic; Gustavo Torres; Ravi Knight; Margarita Calvo; David L H Bennett; Andreas C Themistocleous Journal: J Peripher Nerv Syst Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 5.188
Authors: Troels S Jensen; Pall Karlsson; Sandra S Gylfadottir; Signe T Andersen; David L Bennett; Hatice Tankisi; Nanna B Finnerup; Astrid J Terkelsen; Karolina Khan; Andreas C Themistocleous; Alexander G Kristensen; Mustapha Itani; Søren H Sindrup; Henning Andersen; Morten Charles; Eva L Feldman; Brian C Callaghan Journal: Brain Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Roy Freeman; Jennifer S Gewandter; Catharina G Faber; Christopher Gibbons; Simon Haroutounian; Giuseppe Lauria; Todd Levine; Rayaz A Malik; J Robinson Singleton; A Gordon Smith; Josh Bell; Robert H Dworkin; Eva Feldman; David N Herrmann; Ahmet Hoke; Noah Kolb; Heikki Mansikka; Anne Louise Oaklander; Amanda Peltier; Michael Polydefkis; Elissa Ritt; James W Russell; Stephen Sainati; Deborah Steiner; Roi Treister; Nurcan Üçeyler Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Manuel P Pereira; Claudia Zeidler; Michael Storck; Konstantin Agelopoulos; Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston; Alexander Zink; Sonja Ständer Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Mitchell G Miglis; Jennifer Zitser; Logan Schneider; Emmanuel During; Safwan Jaradeh; Roy Freeman; Christopher H Gibbons Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 6.313