Literature DB >> 2649309

Factors related to outcome in intensive care: French multicenter study. The French Multicenter Group of ICU Research; The Inserm Unit 169 of Statistical and Epidemiological Studies.

.   

Abstract

Four factors influence ICU outcome: age, previous health status (HS), severity of disease, and diagnosis. To assess the specific influence of each factor, 3,687 patients from 38 French ICUs were studied. For each patient, the following were noted: age, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS), previous HS, diagnosis, ICU group (medical [M], surgical unscheduled [S], surgical scheduled or elective [E]), and the immediate outcome. The multivariate analysis ranks the factors in the following order: SAPS, age, ICU group, and previous HS. Diagnosis played a key role in prognosis, e.g., with SAPS score between 10 and 15 points, mortality was 0 for drug overdose, 12% for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 38% for cardiac shock. For most patients, it was difficult to assign only one diagnosis; 37% were given one diagnosis, 39% two diagnoses, 17% three diagnoses, and 7% four and more diagnoses. Using ICU group instead of diagnosis, the mean death rate for groups M, S, and E was 20%, 27%, and 5%, respectively (p less than .001). Our study shows that each of the four factors influences the immediate outcome. It is thus possible to describe and classify ICU patients by this method, but the individual prognosis remains imprecise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2649309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  6 in total

1.  Renal effects of low-dose dopamine in patients with sepsis syndrome or septic shock treated with catecholamines.

Authors:  T Lherm; G Troché; M Rossignol; P Bordes; J F Zazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies?

Authors:  F Brunet; J J Lanore; J F Dhainaut; F Dreyfus; J F Vaxelaire; S Nouira; T Giraud; A Armaganidis; J F Monsallier
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Outcome of intensive care].

Authors:  H P Schuster
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-02-15

4.  Current practice regarding invasive monitoring in intensive care units in Finland. A nationwide study of the uses of arterial, pulmonary artery and central venous catheters and their effect on outcome. The Finnish Intensive Care Study Group.

Authors:  E Saarela; A Kari; P Nikki; V Rauhala; E Iisalo; L Kaukinen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Evaluation of severity scoring systems in ICUs--translation, conversion and definition ambiguities as a source of inter-observer variability in Apache II, SAPS and OSF.

Authors:  E Féry-Lemonnier; P Landais; P Loirat; D Kleinknecht; F Brivet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Time oriented score system (TOSS): a method for direct and quantitative assessment of nursing workload for ICU patients. Italian Multicenter Group of ICU research (GIRTI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.