Literature DB >> 26492956

Pricing and sales tax collection policies for e-cigarette starter kits and disposable products sold online.

Raphael E Cuomo1,2, Angela Miner1, Tim K Mackey1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined marketing characteristics of e-cigarettes sold online and others have examined e-cigarettes pricing in retail (non-Internet) settings. This study expands on these findings by examining pricing and marketing characteristics of interest among e-cigarette online vendors.
METHODS: Structured web searches were conducted from August-September 2014 to identify popular e-cigarette Internet vendors. We then collected pricing data (e-cigarette starter kits and disposables), sales tax collection policies and other vendor marketing characteristics. Average price for each product category was then compared with marketing characteristics using linear regression for continuous variables and independent t-tests for binary variables.
RESULTS: Our searches yielded 44 e-cigarette Internet vendors of which 77% (n = 34) sold a total of 238 starter kit offerings (Mprice = $55.89). Half (n = 22) sold disposable types of e-cigarettes (Mprice = $7.17 p/e-cigarette) at a price lower than reported elsewhere in retail settings. Average disposable e-cigarette prices were also significantly higher for vendors displaying more health warning notices (P = 0.001). Only 46% disclosed sales tax collection policies and only 39% collected sales tax in their state of business.
CONCLUSIONS: This study expands on current understanding of e-cigarette pricing and availability online and finds variation in e-cigarette pricing may be influenced by type of product, use of online health warnings and vendor sales tax collection policies. It also finds that e-cigarette online access and availability may be impacted by a combination of pricing and marketing strategies uniquely different from e-cigarette retail settings that requires further study and targeted policy-making. [Cuomo RE, Miner A, Mackey TK. Pricing and sales tax collection policies for e-cigarette starter kits and disposable products sold online. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015].
© 2015 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet sale; electronic cigarette; nicotine delivery; regulatory science; vaping

Year:  2015        PMID: 26492956     DOI: 10.1111/dar.12353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev        ISSN: 0959-5236


  10 in total

1.  Content analysis of age verification, purchase and delivery methods of internet e-cigarette vendors, 2013 and 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca S Williams; Jason Derrick; Aliza Kate Liebman; Kevin LaFleur; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  An Economic Analysis of the Pre-Deeming US Market for Nicotine Vaping Products.

Authors:  David T Levy; Eric N Lindblom; David T Sweanor; Frank Chaloupka; Richard J O'Connor; Ce Shang; Thomas Palley; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Maciej L Goniewicz; Ron Borland
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2019-03

4.  Internet little cigar and cigarillo vendors: Surveillance of sales and marketing practices via website content analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca S Williams; Jason C Derrick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Content analysis of e-cigarette products, promotions, prices and claims on Internet tobacco vendor websites, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Rebecca S Williams; Jason Derrick; Aliza K Liebman; Kevin LaFleur
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Harm reduction for smokers with little to no quit interest: can tobacco policies encourage switching to e-cigarettes?

Authors:  John Buckell; Lisa M Fucito; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Stephanie O'Malley; Jody L Sindelar
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.953

7.  Characterizing Self-Reported Tobacco, Vaping, and Marijuana-Related Tweets Geolocated for California College Campuses.

Authors:  Raphael E Cuomo; Vidya L Purushothaman; Jiawei Li; Cortni Bardier; Matthew Nali; Neal Shah; Nick Obradovich; Joshua Yang; Tim K Mackey
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-13

8.  Price, convenience, the buying experience, and other motivations for purchasing tobacco and e-cigarettes online.

Authors:  Jessica L King Jensen; Kayla Rebentisch; Hollie L Tripp; Julie W Merten
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  Campus Smoking Policies and Smoking-Related Twitter Posts Originating From California Public Universities: Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Joshua S Yang; Raphael E Cuomo; Vidya Purushothaman; Matthew Nali; Neal Shah; Cortni Bardier; Nick Obradovich; Tim Mackey
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-24

10.  Internet-based Advertising Claims and Consumer Reasons for Using Electronic Cigarettes by Device Type in the US.

Authors:  Kim Pulvers; Jessica Y Sun; Yue-Lin Zhuang; Gabriel Holguin; Shu-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.