INTRODUCTION: The acute surgical model has been trialled in several institutions with mixed results. The aim of this study was to determine whether the acute surgical model provides better outcomes for patients with acute biliary presentation, compared with the traditional emergency surgery model of care. METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out of patients who were admitted for management of acute biliary presentation, before and after the establishment of an acute surgical unit (ASU). Outcomes measured were time to operation, operating time, after-hours operation (6pm - 8am), length of stay and surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients presented with acute biliary symptoms and were managed operatively. The median time to operation was significantly reduced in the ASU group (32.4 vs 25.4 hours, p=0.047), as were the proportion of operations performed after hours (19.5% vs 2.5%, p<0.001) and the median length of stay (4 vs 3 days, p<0.001). The median operating time, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy and wound infection rates remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ASU can lead to objective differences in outcomes for patients who present with acute cholecystitis. In our study, the ASU significantly reduced time to operation, the number of operations performed after hours and length of stay.
INTRODUCTION: The acute surgical model has been trialled in several institutions with mixed results. The aim of this study was to determine whether the acute surgical model provides better outcomes for patients with acute biliary presentation, compared with the traditional emergency surgery model of care. METHODS: A retrospective review was carried out of patients who were admitted for management of acute biliary presentation, before and after the establishment of an acute surgical unit (ASU). Outcomes measured were time to operation, operating time, after-hours operation (6pm - 8am), length of stay and surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients presented with acute biliary symptoms and were managed operatively. The median time to operation was significantly reduced in the ASU group (32.4 vs 25.4 hours, p=0.047), as were the proportion of operations performed after hours (19.5% vs 2.5%, p<0.001) and the median length of stay (4 vs 3 days, p<0.001). The median operating time, rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy and wound infection rates remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ASU can lead to objective differences in outcomes for patients who present with acute cholecystitis. In our study, the ASU significantly reduced time to operation, the number of operations performed after hours and length of stay.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis; Gallbladder diseases; General surgery
Authors: Angela S Earley; John P Pryor; Patrick K Kim; Joseph H Hedrick; Jibby E Kurichi; Amy C Minogue; Seema S Sonnad; Patrick M Reilly; C W Schwab Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michael R Cox; Lyn Cook; Jennifer Dobson; Paul Lambrakis; Shanthan Ganesh; Patrick Cregan Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Andrew D Parasyn; Philip G Truskett; Michael Bennett; Sharon Lum; Jennie Barry; Koroush Haghighi; Philip J Crowe Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Akpofure Peter Ekeh; Benjamin Monson; Curtis J Wozniak; Matthew Armstrong; Mary C McCarthy Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-04-24 Impact factor: 6.113