Literature DB >> 26492093

Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests.

Alessandro Anav1,2, Alessandra De Marco2, Chiara Proietti3, Andrea Alessandri2, Alessandro Dell'Aquila2, Irene Cionni2, Pierre Friedlingstein1, Dmitry Khvorostyanov4, Laurent Menut4, Elena Paoletti5, Pierre Sicard6, Stephen Sitch7, Marcello Vitale3.   

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone (O3) produces harmful effects to forests and crops, leading to a reduction of land carbon assimilation that, consequently, influences the land sink and the crop yield production. To assess the potential negative O3 impacts to vegetation, the European Union uses the Accumulated Ozone over Threshold of 40 ppb (AOT40). This index has been chosen for its simplicity and flexibility in handling different ecosystems as well as for its linear relationships with yield or biomass loss. However, AOT40 does not give any information on the physiological O3 uptake into the leaves since it does not include any environmental constraints to O3 uptake through stomata. Therefore, an index based on stomatal O3 uptake (i.e. PODY), which describes the amount of O3 entering into the leaves, would be more appropriate. Specifically, the PODY metric considers the effects of multiple climatic factors, vegetation characteristics and local and phenological inputs rather than the only atmospheric O3 concentration. For this reason, the use of PODY in the O3 risk assessment for vegetation is becoming recommended. We compare different potential O3 risk assessments based on two methodologies (i.e. AOT40 and stomatal O3 uptake) using a framework of mesoscale models that produces hourly meteorological and O3 data at high spatial resolution (12 km) over Europe for the time period 2000-2005. Results indicate a remarkable spatial and temporal inconsistency between the two indices, suggesting that a new definition of European legislative standard is needed in the near future. Besides, our risk assessment based on AOT40 shows a good consistency compared to both in-situ data and other model-based datasets. Conversely, risk assessment based on stomatal O3 uptake shows different spatial patterns compared to other model-based datasets. This strong inconsistency can be likely related to a different vegetation cover and its associated parameterizations.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AOT40; PODY; forests; ozone; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26492093     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  Five-year volume growth of European beech does not respond to ozone pollution in Italy.

Authors:  Elena Paoletti; Alessandra De Marco; Alessandro Anav; Patrizia Gasparini; Enrico Pompei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Ozone affects plant, insect, and soil microbial communities: A threat to terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity.

Authors:  Evgenios Agathokleous; Zhaozhong Feng; Elina Oksanen; Pierre Sicard; Qi Wang; Costas J Saitanis; Valda Araminiene; James D Blande; Felicity Hayes; Vicent Calatayud; Marisa Domingos; Stavros D Veresoglou; Josep Peñuelas; David A Wardle; Alessandra De Marco; Zhengzhen Li; Harry Harmens; Xiangyang Yuan; Marcello Vitale; Elena Paoletti
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 3.  Current and future ozone risks to global terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem processes.

Authors:  Jürg Fuhrer; Maria Val Martin; Gina Mills; Colette L Heald; Harry Harmens; Felicity Hayes; Katrina Sharps; Jürgen Bender; Mike R Ashmore
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Temporal and Spatial Variation in, and Population Exposure to, Summertime Ground-Level Ozone in Beijing.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Youfei Zheng; Ting Li; Li Wei; Qing Guan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Economic impacts of ambient ozone pollution on wood production in Italy.

Authors:  Sandro Sacchelli; Elisa Carrari; Elena Paoletti; Alessandro Anav; Yasutomo Hoshika; Pierre Sicard; Augusto Screpanti; Gherardo Chirici; Claudia Cocozza; Alessandra De Marco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Spatiotemporal variations of ozone exposure and its risks to vegetation and human health in Cyprus: an analysis across a gradient of altitudes.

Authors:  Stefanos Agathokleous; Costas J Saitanis; Chrysanthos Savvides; Pierre Sicard; Evgenios Agathokleous; Alessandra De Marco
Journal:  J For Res (Harbin)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.361

Review 7.  Strategic roadmap to assess forest vulnerability under air pollution and climate change.

Authors:  Alessandra De Marco; Pierre Sicard; Zhaozhong Feng; Evgenios Agathokleous; Rocio Alonso; Valda Araminiene; Algirdas Augustatis; Ovidiu Badea; James C Beasley; Cristina Branquinho; Viktor J Bruckman; Alessio Collalti; Rakefet David-Schwartz; Marisa Domingos; Enzai Du; Hector Garcia Gomez; Shoji Hashimoto; Yasutomo Hoshika; Tamara Jakovljevic; Steven McNulty; Elina Oksanen; Yusef Omidi Khaniabadi; Anne-Katrin Prescher; Costas J Saitanis; Hiroyuki Sase; Andreas Schmitz; Gabriele Voigt; Makoto Watanabe; Michael D Wood; Mikhail V Kozlov; Elena Paoletti
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 13.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.