Literature DB >> 26491984

Ecotoxicity monitoring and bioindicator screening of oil-contaminated soil during bioremediation.

Weihang Shen1, Nengwu Zhu2, Jiaying Cui1, Huajin Wang1, Zhi Dang3, Pingxiao Wu3, Yidan Luo1, Chaohong Shi1.   

Abstract

A series of toxicity bioassays was conducted to monitor the ecotoxicity of soils in the different phases of bioremediation. Artificially oil-contaminated soil was inoculated with a petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial consortium containing Burkholderia cepacia GS3C, Sphingomonas GY2B and Pandoraea pnomenusa GP3B strains adapted to crude oil. Soil ecotoxicity in different phases of bioremediation was examined by monitoring total petroleum hydrocarbons, soil enzyme activities, phytotoxicity (inhibition of seed germination and plant growth), malonaldehyde content, superoxide dismutase activity and bacterial luminescence. Although the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was reduced by 64.4%, forty days after bioremediation, the phytotoxicity and Photobacterium phosphoreum ecotoxicity test results indicated an initial increase in ecotoxicity, suggesting the formation of intermediate metabolites characterized by high toxicity and low bioavailability during bioremediation. The ecotoxicity values are a more valid indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of bioremediation techniques compared with only using the total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations. Among all of the potential indicators that could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of bioremediation techniques, soil enzyme activities, phytotoxicity (inhibition of plant height, shoot weight and root fresh weight), malonaldehyde content, superoxide dismutase activity and luminescence of P. phosphoreum were the most sensitive.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioindicator; Bioremediation; Ecotoxicity; Oil-contaminated soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491984     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  5 in total

1.  Effect of biostimulation and bioaugmentation on hydrocarbon degradation and detoxification of diesel-contaminated soil: a microcosm study.

Authors:  Patricia Giovanella; Lídia de Azevedo Duarte; Daniela Mayumi Kita; Valéria Maia de Oliveira; Lara Durães Sette
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  The responses of two native plant species to soil petroleum contamination in the Yellow River Delta, China.

Authors:  Wenjun Xie; Yanpeng Zhang; Rui Li; Hongjun Yang; Tao Wu; Liping Zhao; Zhaohua Lu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Identification and characterization of Burkholderia multivorans CCA53.

Authors:  Hironaga Akita; Zen-Ichiro Kimura; Mohd Zulkhairi Mohd Yusoff; Nobutaka Nakashima; Tamotsu Hoshino
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-06

4.  Green Technology for Remediation of Water Polluted with Petroleum Crude Oil: Using of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms Combined with Magnetic Nanoparticles Capped with Myrrh Resources of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ayman M Atta; Nermen H Mohamed; Ahmad K Hegazy; Yasser M Moustafa; Rodina R Mohamed; Gehan Safwat; Ayman A Diab
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Reading the ground: Understanding the response of bioelectric microbes to anthropogenic compounds in soil based terrestrial microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Robyn A Barbato; Robert M Jones; Michael A Musty; Scott M Slone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.