Literature DB >> 26491912

Delay in the Diagnosis of Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Pooya Hosseinzadeh1, Henry J Iwinski, Jonathon Salava, Donna Oeffinger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delays in the diagnosis of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is common due to the vague symptomatology and the lack of awareness of this entity by healthcare providers. Delays in the diagnosis of this condition can lead to poor outcomes for the patients. This study was designed to identify factors that contributed to delays in the diagnosis or the treatment of patients with SCFE seen at our institution.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with the diagnosis of a stable SCFE who had undergone screw stabilization between 1989 and 2010 at our hospital was performed. For each patient, demographic data, the date of initial onset of symptoms, the date of the first visit to the medical provider, the type of provider seen initially (orthopaedic surgeon or not), the date of diagnosis of SCFE, the type of physician who made the diagnosis (orthopaedic surgeon or not), and the date of surgery were recorded. For each patient, the presenting symptom was recorded as hip, thigh, or knee pain. The effect of demographic data, presenting symptoms, and the type of initial provider seen on the delay to diagnosis was studied using 2 Cox models.
RESULTS: A total of 149 patients with 196 stable SCFE were included. The average time from the first physician visit to diagnosis was 94 days in the group seen by a nonorthopaedic provider compared with an average of 2.9 days in the group seen by an orthopaedist (P<0.05). Diagnosis was made in 1 week only in 19% of the group seen by a nonorthopaedic provider versus 97% in the group seen by orthopaedic surgeons. It took significantly longer to be diagnosed with SCFE in patients who presented with initial knee pain (P=0.0097) compared with those who presented with hip pain at the initial visit.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant delay in the diagnosis of SCFE in the United States, particularly in patients seen by nonorthopaedic providers initially. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 26491912     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Early and late complications and their management in slipped capital femoral epiphysis].

Authors:  F F Fernandez; O Eberhardt; T Wirth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.

Authors:  Maureen Purcell; Rustin Reeves; Matthew Mayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  CORR Insights®: What is the Accuracy and Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign on Radiographs for Early Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Compared With MRI as the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Kit M Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: What Is the Accuracy and Reliability of the Peritubercle Lucency Sign on Radiographs for Early Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Compared with MRI as the Gold Standard?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Patricia E Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  A nationwide cohort study of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Daniel C Perry; David Metcalfe; Matthew L Costa; Tjeerd Van Staa
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis amongst various medical specialists.

Authors:  A Lam; S A Boenerjous; Y Lo; J M Abzug; J Kurian; M C Liszewski; D E Sanderson; J M Scholnick; B H Taragin; J A Gomez; N Y Otsuka; R Hanstein
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Causes of Delayed Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Importance of the Frog Lateral Pelvis Projection.

Authors:  Panagiotis V Samelis; Christos Loukas; Sophia Kantanoleon; Harris Lalos; Nikolaos Anoua; Panagiotis Kolovos; Flourentzos Georgiou; Apostolos-Lykourgos Konstantinou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.