Leena Choi1, Benjamin A Ferrell, Eduard E Vasilevskis, Pratik P Pandharipande, Rebecca Heltsley, E Wesley Ely, C Michael Stein, Timothy D Girard. 1. 1Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.2Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.3Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.4Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.5Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.6Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.7Anesthesia Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.8Aegis Sciences Corporation, Nashville, TN.9Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.10Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.11Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize fentanyl population pharmacokinetics in patients with critical illness and identify patient characteristics associated with altered fentanyl concentrations. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical and surgical ICUs in a large tertiary care hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients with acute respiratory failure and/or shock who received fentanyl during the first 5 days of their ICU stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected clinical and hourly drug administration data and measured fentanyl concentrations in plasma collected once daily for up to 5 days after enrollment. Among 337 patients, the mean duration of infusion was 58 hours at a median rate of 100 μg/hr. Using a nonlinear mixed-effects model implemented by NONMEM, we found that fentanyl pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model in which weight, severe liver disease, and congestive heart failure most affected fentanyl concentrations. For a patient population with a mean weight of 92 kg and no history of severe liver disease or congestive heart failure, the final model, which performed well in repeated 10-fold cross-validation, estimated total clearance, intercompartmental clearance (Q), and volumes of distribution for the central (V1) and peripheral compartments (V2) to be 35 L/hr (95% CI, 32-39 L/hr), 55 L/hr (95% CI, 42-68 L/hr), 203 L (95% CI, 140-266 L), and 523 L (95% CI, 428-618 L), respectively. Severity of illness was marginally associated with fentanyl pharmacokinetics but did not improve the model fit after liver and heart diseases were included. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, fentanyl pharmacokinetics during critical illness were strongly influenced by severe liver disease, congestive heart failure, and weight, factors that should be considered when dosing fentanyl in the ICU. Future studies are needed to determine if data-driven fentanyl dosing algorithms can improve outcomes for ICU patients.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize fentanyl population pharmacokinetics in patients with critical illness and identify patient characteristics associated with altered fentanyl concentrations. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Medical and surgical ICUs in a large tertiary care hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients with acute respiratory failure and/or shock who received fentanyl during the first 5 days of their ICU stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected clinical and hourly drug administration data and measured fentanyl concentrations in plasma collected once daily for up to 5 days after enrollment. Among 337 patients, the mean duration of infusion was 58 hours at a median rate of 100 μg/hr. Using a nonlinear mixed-effects model implemented by NONMEM, we found that fentanyl pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model in which weight, severe liver disease, and congestive heart failure most affected fentanyl concentrations. For a patient population with a mean weight of 92 kg and no history of severe liver disease or congestive heart failure, the final model, which performed well in repeated 10-fold cross-validation, estimated total clearance, intercompartmental clearance (Q), and volumes of distribution for the central (V1) and peripheral compartments (V2) to be 35 L/hr (95% CI, 32-39 L/hr), 55 L/hr (95% CI, 42-68 L/hr), 203 L (95% CI, 140-266 L), and 523 L (95% CI, 428-618 L), respectively. Severity of illness was marginally associated with fentanyl pharmacokinetics but did not improve the model fit after liver and heart diseases were included. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, fentanyl pharmacokinetics during critical illness were strongly influenced by severe liver disease, congestive heart failure, and weight, factors that should be considered when dosing fentanyl in the ICU. Future studies are needed to determine if data-driven fentanyl dosing algorithms can improve outcomes for ICU patients.
Authors: Rebecca Heltsley; Anne DePriest; David L Black; Tim Robert; Lucas Marshall; Viola M Meadors; Yale H Caplan; Edward J Cone Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Utkarsh Kohli; Pratik Pandharipande; Mordechai Muszkat; Gbenga G Sofowora; Eitan A Friedman; Mika Scheinin; Alastair J J Wood; E Wesley Ely; Rachel F Tyndale; Leena Choi; C Michael Stein; Daniel Kurnik Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-21 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Robert J Hudson; Ian R Thomson; Blair T Henderson; Karanbir Singh; Gary Harding; David J Peterson Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Eleonora L Swart; Klaas P Zuideveld; Joost de Jongh; Meindert Danhof; Lambertus G Thijs; Robert M J Strack van Schijndel Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Juliana Barr; Gilles L Fraser; Kathleen Puntillo; E Wesley Ely; Céline Gélinas; Joseph F Dasta; Judy E Davidson; John W Devlin; John P Kress; Aaron M Joffe; Douglas B Coursin; Daniel L Herr; Avery Tung; Bryce R H Robinson; Dorrie K Fontaine; Michael A Ramsay; Richard R Riker; Curtis N Sessler; Brenda Pun; Yoanna Skrobik; Roman Jaeschke Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Yahya Shehabi; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael C Reade; Michael Bailey; Frances Bass; Belinda Howe; Colin McArthur; Ian M Seppelt; Steve Webb; Leonie Weisbrodt Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Fanuel T Hagos; Christopher M Horvat; Alicia K Au; Yvette P Conley; Lingjue Li; Samuel M Poloyac; Patrick M Kochanek; Robert S B Clark; Philip E Empey Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Stefan J Schaller; Michio Nagashima; Martin Schönfelder; Tomoki Sasakawa; Fabian Schulz; Mohammed A S Khan; William R Kem; Gerhard Schneider; Jürgen Schlegel; Heidrun Lewald; Manfred Blobner; J A Jeevendra Martyn Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Erwin Ista; Monique van Dijk; Dick Tibboel; Elke H J Krekels; Catherijne A J Knibbe Journal: AAPS J Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Anil R Maharaj; Huali Wu; Kanecia O Zimmerman; David G Speicher; Janice E Sullivan; Kevin Watt; Amira Al-Uzri; Elizabeth H Payne; Jinson Erinjeri; Susan Lin; Barrie Harper; Chiara Melloni; Christoph P Hornik Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-08 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Renato Lucas P de Souza; João Abrão; Luís V Garcia; Sofia Vila Moutinho; Ester Wiggers; Andiamira Cagnoni Balestra Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen; Antonio Paulo Nassar Júnior; Fábio Holanda Lacerda; Carla Marchini Dias da Silva; Vanessa Tota de Souza; Eliana Vieira do Nascimento Martins; Ana Tarina Alvarez Lopes; Carlos Eduardo Brandão; Lucas Fernandes de Oliveira Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2019 Oct-Dec