| Literature DB >> 26491314 |
R Lakshmi1, S Sasikumar1.
Abstract
In the past 2 decades,Entities:
Keywords: bioceramics; compressive strength; hydroxyapatite; morphology; sol-gel combustion synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26491314 PMCID: PMC4599603 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S79986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared spectra of (a) wollastonite and (b) precursor.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction pattern of wollastonite prepared using urea as the fuel by sol-gel combustion method.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscope images of wollastonite.
Notes: (A) At lower magnification. (B) At higher magnification.
Figure 4TEM (A) and high-resolution TEM (B) images of wollastonite.
Note: Arrow (B) specifies the particular magnified portion of the TEM image and its d spacing value.
Abbreviation: TEM, transmission electron microscope.
Figure 5In vitro bioactivity of wollastonite scaffold after different immersion periods.
Notes: (a) 7 days. (b) 14 days. (c) 21 days.
Figure 6Nanocrystalline wollastonite enhances the hydroxyapatite deposition.
Figure 7Normal view and cross sectional view of wollastonite scaffold after hydroxyapatite.
Notes: Normal (A) and cross-sectional (B) SEM images of surface of the wollastonite scaffold after hydroxyapatite nucleation. (C) EDS spectrum of wollastonite after hydroxyapatite deposition.
Abbreviations: EDS, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy; SEM, scanning electron microscope.
Figure 8Ion concentrations in the simulated body fluid solution after soaking with the wollastonite scaffold for various durations.
Figure 9The compression stress–strain curve of wollastonite.