Literature DB >> 26490851

Human Frontal-Subcortical Circuit and Asymmetric Belief Updating.

Christina Moutsiana1, Caroline J Charpentier2, Neil Garrett3, Michael X Cohen4, Tali Sharot3.   

Abstract

How humans integrate information to form beliefs about reality is a question that has engaged scientists for centuries, yet the biological system supporting this process is not well understood. One of the most salient attributes of information is valence. Whether a piece of news is good or bad is critical in determining whether it will alter our beliefs. Here, we reveal a frontal-subcortical circuit in the left hemisphere that is simultaneously associated with enhanced integration of favorable information into beliefs and impaired integration of unfavorable information. Specifically, for favorable information, stronger white matter connectivity within this system, particularly between the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and left subcortical regions (including the amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, putamen, and pallidum), as well as insular cortex, is associated with greater change in belief. However, for unfavorable information, stronger connectivity within this system, particularly between the left IFG and left pallidum, putamen, and insular cortex, is associated with reduced change in beliefs. These novel results are consistent with models suggesting that partially separable processes govern learning from favorable and unfavorable information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Beliefs of what may happen in the future are important, because they guide decisions and actions. Here, we illuminate how structural brain connectivity is related to the generation of subjective beliefs. We focus on how the valence of information is related to people's tendency to alter their beliefs. By quantifying the extent to which participants update their beliefs in response to desirable and undesirable information and relating those measures to the strength of white matter connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging, we characterize a left frontal-subcortical system that is associated simultaneously with greater belief updating in response to favorable information and reduced belief updating in response to unfavorable information. This neural architecture may allow valence to be incorporated into belief updating.
Copyright © 2015 Moutsiana et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DTI; belief updating; frontal-subcortical circuit; individual differences; valence; white-matter connectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490851      PMCID: PMC4683678          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1120-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update.

Authors:  Sibel Tekin; Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Selectively altering belief formation in the human brain.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Ryota Kanai; David Marston; Christoph W Korn; Geraint Rees; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Opponent actor learning (OpAL): modeling interactive effects of striatal dopamine on reinforcement learning and choice incentive.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural correlates of informational cascades: brain mechanisms of social influence on belief updating.

Authors:  Rafael E Huber; Vasily Klucharev; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Christoph W Korn; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events.

Authors:  C W Korn; T Sharot; H Walter; H R Heekeren; R J Dolan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  How robust is the optimistic update bias for estimating self-risk and population base rates?

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Tali Sharot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Causal Inference About Good and Bad Outcomes.

Authors:  Hayley M Dorfman; Rahul Bhui; Brent L Hughes; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13

2.  Age-related differences in structural and functional prefrontal networks during a logical reasoning task.

Authors:  Maryam Ziaei; Mohammad Reza Bonyadi; David C Reutens
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Reduced network integration in default mode and executive networks is associated with social and personal optimism biases.

Authors:  Dominik Andreas Moser; Mihai Dricu; Raviteja Kotikalapudi; Gaelle Eve Doucet; Tatjana Aue
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Valence-Dependent Belief Updating: Computational Validation.

Authors:  Bojana Kuzmanovic; Lionel Rigoux
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-29

5.  Optimistic update bias holds firm: Three tests of robustness following Shah et al.

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Tali Sharot
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-11-09

6.  Forming global estimates of self-performance from local confidence.

Authors:  Marion Rouault; Peter Dayan; Stephen M Fleming
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Evidence accumulation is biased by motivation: A computational account.

Authors:  Filip Gesiarz; Donal Cahill; Tali Sharot
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Neurostructural correlates of optimism: Gray matter density in the putamen predicts dispositional optimism in late adolescence.

Authors:  Han Lai; Song Wang; Yajun Zhao; Chen Qiu; Qiyong Gong
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Distinct neural processes support post-success and post-error slowing in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Yihe Zhang; Jaime S Ide; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; Nikola S Valchev; Xiaoying Tang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Updating Beliefs under Perceived Threat.

Authors:  Neil Garrett; Ana María González-Garzón; Lucy Foulkes; Liat Levita; Tali Sharot
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.