Marissa G Hall1,2, Rebecca S Williams2,3, Doris G Gammon4, Kurt M Ribisl1,2,3. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. 3. Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Carrboro, North Carolina, USA. 4. RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to (1) assess whether promotion of tax-free sales among Internet cigarette vendors (ICVs) changed between 2009 and 2011, (2) determine which types of ICVs are most likely to promote tax-free sales (eg, US-based, international or mixed location ICVs), and (3) compare the price of cigarettes advertised in ICVs to prices at brick-and-mortar retail outlets. METHODS: We analysed data from the 200 most popular ICVs in 2009, 2010 and 2011 to assess promotion of tax-free sales and the price of Marlboro cigarette cartons. We used Nielsen scanner data from 2009, 2010 and 2011 to measure the price of Marlboro cartons in US grocery stores. FINDINGS: The odds of ICVs claiming tax-free status were higher in 2011 than in 2009 (OR=1.58, p<0.01). Mixed location and international vendors had higher odds of promoting tax-free sales than US-based ICVs (OR=4.95 and 6.23, respectively, both p<0.001). In 2011, the average price of one Marlboro carton was $35.27 online, compared to $52.73 in US grocery stores. We estimated that in 2011, a pack-a-day smoker living in an area with high cigarette prices would save $1508 per year buying cigarettes online. CONCLUSIONS: ICVs commonly promote tax-free sales, and cigarettes are cheaper online compared to US grocery stores. Better enforcement of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act is needed to address tax-free cigarette sales among ICVs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to (1) assess whether promotion of tax-free sales among Internet cigarette vendors (ICVs) changed between 2009 and 2011, (2) determine which types of ICVs are most likely to promote tax-free sales (eg, US-based, international or mixed location ICVs), and (3) compare the price of cigarettes advertised in ICVs to prices at brick-and-mortar retail outlets. METHODS: We analysed data from the 200 most popular ICVs in 2009, 2010 and 2011 to assess promotion of tax-free sales and the price of Marlboro cigarette cartons. We used Nielsen scanner data from 2009, 2010 and 2011 to measure the price of Marlboro cartons in US grocery stores. FINDINGS: The odds of ICVs claiming tax-free status were higher in 2011 than in 2009 (OR=1.58, p<0.01). Mixed location and international vendors had higher odds of promoting tax-free sales than US-based ICVs (OR=4.95 and 6.23, respectively, both p<0.001). In 2011, the average price of one Marlboro carton was $35.27 online, compared to $52.73 in US grocery stores. We estimated that in 2011, a pack-a-day smoker living in an area with high cigarette prices would save $1508 per year buying cigarettes online. CONCLUSIONS: ICVs commonly promote tax-free sales, and cigarettes are cheaper online compared to US grocery stores. Better enforcement of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act is needed to address tax-free cigarette sales among ICVs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Michael F Pesko; Xin Xu; Michael A Tynan; Robert B Gerzoff; Ann M Malarcher; Terry F Pechacek Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Monica E Cornelius; Pete Driezen; Andrew Hyland; Geoffrey T Fong; Frank J Chaloupka; K Michael Cummings Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Rebecca S Williams; Jason Derrick; Aliza Kate Liebman; Kevin LaFleur; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Kurt M Ribisl; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Jidong Huang; Rebecca S Williams; Eric C Donny Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Rosemary Hiscock; J Robert Branston; Ann McNeill; Sara C Hitchman; Timea R Partos; Anna B Gilmore Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 7.552