Literature DB >> 26490696

Do nurse sows and foster litters have impaired animal welfare? Results from a cross-sectional study in sow herds.

J T Sørensen1, T Rousing1, A B Kudahl1, H J Hansted1, L J Pedersen1.   

Abstract

Increasing litter size has led to introduction of so-called nurse sows in several EU countries. A nurse sow is a sow receiving piglets after having weaned her own piglets and thereby experiencing an extended lactation. In order to analyse whether nurse sows have more welfare problems than non-nurse sows a cross-sectional study was conducted in 57 sow herds in Denmark. Clinical observations were made on nurse and non-nurse sows and their litters. The clinical observations were dichotomized and the effect of being a nurse sow was analysed based on eight parameters: thin (body condition score<2.5), swollen bursae on legs, dew claw wounds, vulva lesions, poor hygiene, poor skin condition, shoulder lesions and cuts and wounds on the udder. Explanatory variables included in the eight models were: nurse sow (yes=1/no=0), age of piglets (weeks old, 1 to 7), parity (1 to 8+) and all first order interactions between these three variables. The effect of using nurse sows on piglet welfare was analysed with five models. The outcomes were: huddling, poor hygiene, lameness, snout cuts and carpal abrasions. The explanatory variables included in the five models were: nurse sow (yes=1/no=0), age of piglets (weeks old, 1 to 7), parity (1 to 8+) and all first order interactions between these three variables. Herd identity was included as a random factor in all models. The nurse sows had a significantly higher risk of swollen bursae on legs (P=0.038) and udder wounds (P=0.001). No differences in risk of being thin or having shoulder lesions were found. Foster litters had significantly higher risk of being dirty (P=0.026) and getting carpal abrasions (P=0.024) than non-foster litters. There was a tendency for higher lameness in foster litters than in non-foster litters (P=0.052). The results show that nurse sows and their piglets to some extent experience more welfare problems than non-nurse sows with piglets at a similar age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lactating sows; piglets; welfare

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490696     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115002104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  6 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 2.  A Review of Success Factors for Piglet Fostering in Lactation.

Authors:  Jena G Alexopoulos; David S Lines; Suzanne Hallett; Kate J Plush
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Extended nursing and/or increased starter diet allowances for low weaning weight pigs.

Authors:  Aimee-Louise Craig; Ramon Muns; Alan Gordon; Elizabeth Magowan
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  Coping with large litters: management effects on welfare and nursing capacity of the sow.

Authors:  Olli Peltoniemi; Taehee Han; Jinhyeon Yun
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-31

5.  Animal Welfare and Economic Aspects of Using Nurse Sows in Swedish Pig Production.

Authors:  Karin Alvåsen; Helena Hansson; Ulf Emanuelson; Rebecka Westin
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Suckling Piglets: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marika Vitali; Elena Santacroce; Federico Correa; Chiara Salvarani; Francesca Paola Maramotti; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Trevisi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.