Literature DB >> 2649069

Rats (Rattus norvegicus) selectively bred to differ in avoidance behavior also differ in response to novelty stress, in glycemic conditioning, and in reward contrast.

C F Flaherty1, G A Rowan.   

Abstract

The behavior of the Syracuse high avoidance (SHA) and Syracuse low avoidance (SLA) rats, selectively bred by Brush (F. R. Brush, J. C. Froehlich, & P. Sakellaris, 1979, Behavior Genetics, 9, 309-316) to differ in avoidance behavior, was examined in several different tasks. The SLA rats showed a greater elevation in plasma glucose when exposed to a novel environment; after 7 days of exposure to this environment there was evidence of habituation in the SHA rats but not in the SLA rats; the SHA rats showed a hyperglycemic conditioned response in a glycemic conditioning procedure, the SLA rats showed no evidence of conditioning but had higher overall levels of plasma glucose; both strains showed reliable successive negative contrast effects in consummatory behavior when shifted from 32 to 4% sucrose, but the contrast was larger in the SLA rats; the administration of chlordiazepoxide eliminated negative contrast in the SLA rats but had no effect on contrast in the SHA rats; and the SLA rats were reliably heavier than the SHA rats. The behavioral differences were considered in the context of differences in emotional reactivity between the two strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2649069     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(89)90782-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  8 in total

1.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Genetic determinants of individual differences in avoidance learning: behavioral and endocrine characteristics.

Authors:  F R Brush
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1991-10-15

3.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Authors:  E S Webber; N E Chambers; J A Kostek; D E Mankin; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Lewis rats are more sensitive than Fischer rats to successive negative contrast, but less sensitive to the anxiolytic and appetite-stimulating effects of chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Jason D Tesche; Dennie M Tompers; Katherine E Riegel; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Aversive properties of negative incentive shifts in Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.

Authors:  Adam Brewer; Patrick Johnson; Jeff Stein; Michael Schlund; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The effects of extended training and acute administration of an anxiolytic on avoidance learning and intertrial responding in the Syracuse strains of rats.

Authors:  C M Gendron; F R Brush
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Long-term changes in cognitive bias and coping response as a result of chronic unpredictable stress during adolescence.

Authors:  Lauren E Chaby; Sonia A Cavigelli; Amanda White; Kayllie Wang; Victoria A Braithwaite
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Testing for Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Domestic Horses (Equus caballus) Across Different Contexts - Consistency Over Time and Effects of Context.

Authors:  Alexandra Safryghin; Denise V Hebesberger; Claudia A F Wascher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.