| Literature DB >> 26490645 |
Anvar Babaev1, Susanna Zavlunova2, Michael J Attubato2, Brad J Martinsen3, Gary S Mintz4, Akiko Maehara4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Tissue Removal Assessment with Ultrasound of the SFA and Popliteal (TRUTH) study assessed the performance of the orbital atherectomy system (OAS) to treat femoropopliteal arteries, including determining its effect on plaque removal.Entities:
Keywords: calcification; intravascular ultrasound; orbital atherectomy; peripheral arterial disease
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26490645 PMCID: PMC4647186 DOI: 10.1177/1538574415607361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vasc Endovascular Surg ISSN: 1538-5744 Impact factor: 1.089
Patient Characteristics (Baseline).
| Baseline Characteristic | Result |
|---|---|
| Age | 70.4 ± 7.8 years (N = 25) |
| (58.0-84.0) | |
| Gender (male) | 19/25 (76.0%) |
| Race | |
| Black or African American | 1/25 (4.0%) |
| White | 24/25 (96.0%) |
| BMI | 31.2 ± 6.3 (N = 25) |
| (23.4-49.6) | |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 70.9 ± 25.0 (N = 25) |
| (25.1-115.7) | |
| History of diabetes (type 1 or 2) | 18/25 (72.0%) |
| History of hyperlipidemia | 25/25 (100.0%) |
| History of hypertension | 25/25 (100.0%) |
| History of angina | 4/25 (16.0%) |
| Prior stroke/transient ischemic attack | 0/25 (0.0%) |
| Prior MI | 1/25 (4.0%) |
| Smoker (current or former) | 21/25 (84.0%) |
| Rutherford classification | 3.0 ± 0.0 |
| (3.0-3.0) | |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; MI, myocardial infarction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Values are n/N (%) or mean ± standard deviation (range).
Vessel and Lesion Characteristics by Angiography.
| Procedural Information | Result |
|---|---|
| Target lesion location | |
| Superficial femoral artery | 23/29 (79.3%) |
| Popliteal | 4/29 (13.8%) |
| Tibioperoneal trunk | 2/29 (6.9%) |
| Mean target lesions per patient | 1.2 ± 0.4 (N = 25) |
| (1.0-2.0) | |
| Mean lesion length, mm | 65.4 ± 27.8 (n = 29) |
| (20.0-109.0) | |
| Proximal reference vessel diameter, mm | 5.2 ± 0.8 (n = 29) |
| (3.0-6.0) | |
| Distal reference diameter, mm | 5.4 ± 0.7 (n = 29) |
| (3.6-7.0) | |
| Minimum lumen diameter, mm | 0.9 ± 0.7 (n = 29) |
| (0.0-2.0) | |
Values are n/N (%) or mean ± standard deviation (range).
Procedural Stenosis and Minimum Lumen Diameter by Angiography (By Lesion).
| (A) Pre-OAS (n = 29) | (B) Post-OAS (n = 29) | (C) Post-BA (n = 29) |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | A v B | B v C | ||||
| Procedural stenosis, % | 84.4 ± 11.9 | 62.9 ± 10.7 | 32.6 ± 10.3 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 |
| MLD, mm | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 |
Abbreviations: BA, balloon angioplasty; MLD, minimum lumen diameter; OAS, orbital atherectomy system. Values are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 1.Angiography case example. A lesion in the mid to distal superficial femoral artery was treated with orbital atherectomy system (OAS; 2.0 mm Crown). The post-POBA flow was excellent. POBA indicates postoperative ballon angioplasty.
Ankle–Brachial Index and Rutherford Classification by Visit Interval.
| Baseline (N = 25) | 2-Week Follow-Up (N = 25) | 6-Month Follow-up (N = 24) | 12-Month Follow-up (N = 22) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutherford Classification (RC) | |||||
| Asymptomatic (RC 0) | 0 (0.0%) | 24 (96.0%) | 19 (79.2%) | 13 (59.1%) | <.001 |
| Mild Claudication (RC 1) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.0%) | 2 (8.3%) | 8 (36.4%) | |
| Moderate Claudication (RC 2) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Severe Claudication (RC 3) | 25 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| ABIb | 0.74 ± 0.13 (N = 22) | 1.01 ± 0.10 (N = 24) | 0.96 ± 0.18 (N = 23) | 0.95 ± 0.15 (N = 21) | <.001 |
Abbreviation: ABI, ankle–brachial index.
Values are n (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
a P value comparison for baseline versus 12-month follow-up.
bGreater of posterior tibial or dorsalis pedis systolic pressure divided by maximum of left or right brachial systolic pressure.
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization.
| Number of Days Postprocedure | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 14 | 183 | 335 | 365 | |
| At risk | 25 | 25 | 24 | 21 | 13 |
| Patients with events | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Censored | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Event free | 100.0% | 100.0% | 96.0% | 91.8% | 91.8% |
| Standard deviation | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.9% | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| 95% Confidence interval | 100.0%-100.0% | 100.0%-100.0% | 88.3%-103.7% | 81.0%-102.7% | 81.0%-102.7% |
Grayscale and Virtual Histology IVUS Findings in 24 Lesions.
| (a) Pre | (b) Post-OAS | (c) Post-Balloon | Overall |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal reference lumen area, mm2 | 14.5 (11.2, 18.3) | 14.5 (10.2, 19.9) | 15.4 (12.0, 20.7) | .0063 | .63 | .063 |
| Distal reference lumen area, mm2 | 16.8 (11.0, 19.0) | 15.7 (11.3, 21.9) | 17.3 (14.4, 21.4) | .002 | .55 | .026 |
| Minimum lumen area, mm2 | 4.0 (2.2, 4.9) | 4.7 (3.2, 5.9) | 9.1 (7.8, 10.5) | <.0001 | .072 | <.0001 |
| Area stenosis, (%) | 76.9 (61.3, 80.5) | 63.8 (57.6, 76.7) | 43.0 (27.3, 56.4) | <.0001 | .067 | <.0001 |
| MLA site prior to intervention | ||||||
| Lumen area, mm2 | 4.0 (2.2, 4.9) | 5.6 (4.4, 7.7) | 11.2 (9.9, 12.8) | <.0001 | .0007 | <.0001 |
| Vessel area, mm2 | 29.2 (24.1, 35.5) | 31.7 (25.2, 38.4) | 34.1 (30.6, 41.0) | <.0001 | .42 | .0036 |
| Plaque burden (%) | 86.5 (84.6, 91.3) | 81.6 (77.0, 85.9) | 67.9 (59.7, 74.2) | <.0001 | .0006 | <.0001 |
| Entire lesion analysis | ||||||
| Mean lumen area, mm3/mm | 8.5 (5.0, 9.9) | 8.9 (8.1, 11.1) | 12.9 (11.7, 15.2) | <.0001 | .037 | <.0001 |
| Mean vessel area, mm3/mm | 31.4 (26.1, 35.2) | 31.8 (25.9, 37.8) | 34.5 (31.9, 40.3) | <.0001 | .21 | <.0001 |
| Mean plaque area, mm3/mm | 22.1 (18.5, 28.1) | 22.1 (18.1, 26.2) | 21.9 (17.9, 25.3) | .040 | .70 | .23 |
| Mean dense calcium area, mm3/mm | 1.6 (1.0, 2.1) | 1.5 (0.9, 2.0) | 1.6 (1.1, 2.1) | .88 | .90 | .91 |
| Mean necrotic core area, mm3/mm | 4.4 (3.3, 6.1) | 4.7 (2.9, 5.9) | 4.4 (2.5, 5.3) | .12 | .99 | .18 |
| Mean fibrous area, mm3/mm | 9.0 (7.0, 12.3) | 9.2 (7.0, 12.2) | 9.2 (6.4, 11.5) | .0082 | .88 | .048 |
| Mean fibrofatty area, mm3/mm | 1.6 (0.9, 3.0) | 1.9 (1.1, 2.7) | 2.1 (1.1, 2.5) | .72 | .79 | .99 |
Abbreviations: IVUS, Intravascular ultrasound; OAS, orbital atherectomy system; MLA, minimum lumen area.
Values are median (Interquartile range).
Grayscale IVUS Findings: 28 Calcified Plaques in 13 Lesions.
| (a) Pre | (b) Post-OAS | (c) Post-Balloon | Overall |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumen area, mm2 | 6.2 (4.7, 8.7) | 8.4 (6.4, 10.9) | 12.2 (11.2, 14.9) | <.0001 | .0013 | <.0001 |
| Area stenosis (%) | 57.5 (28.7, 68.7) | 38.0 (10.9, 45.0) | 15.7 (9.5, 41.6) | <.0001 | <.0001 | .002 |
| Minimum lumen diameter, mm2 | 2.1 (1.8, 2.5) | 2.5 (2.3, 3.0) | 3.2 (2.7, 3.6) | <.0001 | .0001 | <.0001 |
| Lumen symmetry index | 0.67 (0.41, 0.83) | 0.70 (0.52, 0.82) | 0.67 (0.52, 0.79) | .41 | .43 | .65 |
| Superficial calcium arc, ° | 137 (96, 205) | 119 (94, 229) | 127 (82, 239) | .89 | .93 | .99 |
| % Lumen gain secondary to calcium reduction | – | 86 (35,100) | – | – | – | – |
| Reverberation | 25% (7/28) | 39% (11/28) | 36% (10/28) | .095 | .11 | .86 |
| Arc of reverberation, ° | 22 (18, 24) | 39 (27, 60) | 28 (20, 47) | .043 | .051 | .28 |
Abbreviations: IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; OAS, orbital atherectomy system.
Values are % (n/N) or median (Interquartile range).
Figure 2.A representative case of pretreatment, post-orbital atherectomy system (OAS), and post-balloon angioplasty (BA) images. The lumen increased from pretreatment (4.2 mm2) to post-OAS (11.5 mm2) to post-BA (17.5 mm2). The circumference (red line) of calcium surface increased from pretreatment to post-OAS to post-BA.
Figure 3.A representative case of pretreatment, post-orbital atherectomy system (OAS) appearing reverberation. Panel A pretreatment and Panel B post-OAS were matched. Panel A and B correspond directly to Panel A’ and B’. Reverberation (red lines in A’ and B’) increased from pretreatment to post-OAS due to polished surface of calcified plaque. Blue dots = 1 mm scale.