Literature DB >> 26490443

Boredom in the Workplace: A New Look at an Old Problem.

Mary L Cummings1, Fei Gao2, Kris M Thornburg3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We review historical and more recent efforts in boredom research and related fields. A framework is presented that organizes the various facets of boredom, particularly in supervisory control settings, and research gaps and future potential areas for study are highlighted.
BACKGROUND: Given the ubiquity of boredom across a wide spectrum of work environments--exacerbated by increasingly automated systems that remove humans from direct, physical system interaction and possibly increasing tedium in the workplace--there is a need not only to better understand the multiple facets of boredom in work environments but to develop targeted mitigation strategies.
METHOD: To better understand the relationships between the various influences and outcomes of boredom, a systems-based framework, called the Boredom Influence Diagram, is proposed that describes various elements of boredom and their interrelationships.
RESULTS: Boredom is closely related to vigilance, attention management, and task performance. This review highlights the need to develop more naturalistic experiments that reflect the characteristics of a boring work environment.
CONCLUSION: With the increase in automation, boredom in the workplace will likely become a more prevalent issue for motivation and retention. In addition, developing continuous measures of boredom based on physiological signals is critical. APPLICATION: Personnel selection and improvements in system and task design can potentially mitigate boredom. However, more work is needed to develop and evaluate other potential interventions.
© 2015, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automation; boredom; distraction; fatigue; monitoring; monotony; workload

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490443     DOI: 10.1177/0018720815609503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  10 in total

1.  Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention.

Authors:  Andrew Hunter; John D Eastwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  POTATO: Automated pipeline for batch analysis of optical tweezers data.

Authors:  Stefan Buck; Lukas Pekarek; Neva Caliskan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.699

3.  Auditory Task Irrelevance: A Basis for Inattentional Deafness.

Authors:  Menja Scheer; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153.

Authors:  David Lucas; Olaf Chresten Jensen; Brice Loddé; Richard Pougnet; Jean-Dominique Dewitte; Dominique Jegaden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Portrait of Boredom Among Athletes and Its Implications in Sports Management: A Multi-Method Approach.

Authors:  Franklin Velasco; Rafael Jorda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-26

6.  Experienced entropy drives choice behavior in a boring decision-making task.

Authors:  Johannes P-H Seiler; Ohad Dan; Oliver Tüscher; Yonatan Loewenstein; Simon Rumpel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Experiences of distortions to the passage of time during the Argentinian Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  María Elena Brenlla; Guadalupe Germano; Mariana S Seivane; Rocío Fernández da Lama; Ruth Ogden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alpha Oscillations in Parietal and Parietooccipital Explaining How Boredom Matters Prospective Memory.

Authors:  Pin-Hsuan Chen; Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 9.  Autopilot, Mind Wandering, and the Out of the Loop Performance Problem.

Authors:  Jonas Gouraud; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Out of the Loop, in Your Bubble: Mind Wandering Is Independent From Automation Reliability, but Influences Task Engagement.

Authors:  Jonas Gouraud; Arnaud Delorme; Bruno Berberian
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.