PURPOSE: Cocktail approach using a combination of probes to phenotype several cytochromes P450 or transporters is of high interest in anticipating drug–drug interactions and personalized medicine. Its clinical use remains however limited by the intensive sampling scheme required to obtain phenotyping indexes (PI) which consists in calculating the area under the concentration–time curves. We proposed to use maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAPBE) that incorporates available information from the whole population to derive PI from a few individual observations. The performance of a limited sampling strategy (LSS) based on MAPBE was evaluated for a five-probe cocktail. METHODS: The studied cocktail included midazolam, tolbutamide, caffeine, dextromethorphan, omeprazole and their relevant metabolites. Prior information for MAPBE was obtained by nonlinear mixed-effect modelling of data from a pilot study. Sampling times were chosen based on optimal design theory using the Bayesian Fisher information matrix. Through a simulation study, we investigated the predicted PI in terms of bias and imprecision for varying number and timing of samples. RESULTS: Some three-point Bayesian designs gave mean prediction errors in [−5 %, 5 %], root mean square errors below 30 % for all probes, except dextromethorphan whose model should be consolidated further with additional data. This approach gave overall less outlier predicted values than single-point metrics and was more flexible to the timing of the latest sampling. CONCLUSIONS: MAPBE is accurate for predicting simultaneously several PI while being flexible in terms of integrating clinical constraints. Therefore, LSS based on MAPBE could help reduce the time of presence in hospital for individuals to be phenotyped.
PURPOSE: Cocktail approach using a combination of probes to phenotype several cytochromes P450 or transporters is of high interest in anticipating drug–drug interactions and personalized medicine. Its clinical use remains however limited by the intensive sampling scheme required to obtain phenotyping indexes (PI) which consists in calculating the area under the concentration–time curves. We proposed to use maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation (MAPBE) that incorporates available information from the whole population to derive PI from a few individual observations. The performance of a limited sampling strategy (LSS) based on MAPBE was evaluated for a five-probe cocktail. METHODS: The studied cocktail included midazolam, tolbutamide, caffeine, dextromethorphan, omeprazole and their relevant metabolites. Prior information for MAPBE was obtained by nonlinear mixed-effect modelling of data from a pilot study. Sampling times were chosen based on optimal design theory using the Bayesian Fisher information matrix. Through a simulation study, we investigated the predicted PI in terms of bias and imprecision for varying number and timing of samples. RESULTS: Some three-point Bayesian designs gave mean prediction errors in [−5 %, 5 %], root mean square errors below 30 % for all probes, except dextromethorphan whose model should be consolidated further with additional data. This approach gave overall less outlier predicted values than single-point metrics and was more flexible to the timing of the latest sampling. CONCLUSIONS: MAPBE is accurate for predicting simultaneously several PI while being flexible in terms of integrating clinical constraints. Therefore, LSS based on MAPBE could help reduce the time of presence in hospital for individuals to be phenotyped.
Authors: Sweta Tandra; Naga Chalasani; David R Jones; Samer Mattar; Stephen D Hall; Raj Vuppalanchi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ron H J Mathijssen; Floris A de Jong; Ron H N van Schaik; Erin R Lepper; Lena E Friberg; Trinet Rietveld; Peter de Bruijn; Wilfried J Graveland; William D Figg; Jaap Verweij; Alex Sparreboom Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-11-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kara Lee Shirley; Yuen Y Hon; Scott R Penzak; Y W Francis Lam; Vicky Spratlin; Michael W Jann Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Massimiliano Donzelli; Adrian Derungs; Maria-Giovanna Serratore; Christoph Noppen; Lana Nezic; Stephan Krähenbühl; Manuel Haschke Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: F Mentré; M Chenel; E Comets; J Grevel; A Hooker; M O Karlsson; M Lavielle; I Gueorguieva Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2013-06-05
Authors: Swan Lin; Mina Nikanjam; Edmund V Capparelli; Alessandro Allegrini; Daniele Pavone; Dong-Seok Yim; Muhammad M Hammami; Joseph S Bertino; Anne N Nafziger; Yoo-Sin Park; Ju-Seop Kang; Ophelia Q Yin; Joseph D Ma Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.681